• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tcaudilllg

I'd like to see games made around the following plot

15 posts in this topic

"NRA Assault" would be a series of games focused around fighting the NRA. One would be a RTS featuring two sides, the NRA vs vigilante gun control proponents. The other game would be a 3-D shooter in which the object is to assasinate key figures in the NRA. Players would have in their arsenal every weapon previously banned under the Assault Weapons Control Act.

I'm not claiming ownership of this idea -- consider it released to the public domain -- but I'd like to see it implemented.
-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I guess not. I guess this series would just make the NRA grab onto their guns even tighter. The natural response of NRA affiliated persons to violence is to load their guns, after all. I thought it might make them stop and think, but I guess I misjudged their rationale for wanting guns. It's not just to defend against crazies... it's to defend against their critics as well.
-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Prinz Eugn' timestamp='1343009114' post='4962110']
Sounds too political to ever be viable save as propaganda game, and those are um, kinda 'niche'.
[/quote]

Why? Who says it can't sell?

Of course, the person with the idea has to care about the game idea enough to actually make it, and finish it. Nobody's gonna do it for them. It's good to explore whether one is just contemplating a "debating outburst," or one has the energy, enthusiasm, and depth of subject to make an entire game out of it.

[quote name='Stormynature' timestamp='1343017209' post='4962133']
I have to ask why you would choose this particular time and content material given recent tragic events.
[/quote]

Why not? We have a First Amendment in the USA for a reason. Speech is often [i]intended[/i] to offend somebody, to shake up their thinking. There's always going to be some bad / inappropriate time according to someone's point of view. Such points of view are irrelevant. In the USA we are free to speak if we want to. We just have to accept the consequences of our speech, that people may say bad things about us. On the other hand from a promotion standpoint, some people believe there's no such thing as bad publicity.

My own question about recent events in Colorado, is why in such a gun friendly state, with its "[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine"]Make My Day[/url]" law and so forth, didn't anybody in the theater shoot back? I'm guessing that very few people in urban areas actually carry guns.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I say it can’t sell because games so blatantly political generally don’t. Retailers are going to stay away, which will counteract any free publicity it will get from being controversial. The NRA especially has a very competent legal/publicity organization that will pretty much guarantee that.

I think you could make an effective propaganda game around the gun control debate, but I don’t think the game ideas as originally presented are very effective. I couldn’t even understand whether they were pro-gun control or anti-gun control.

For example, a pro-gun control game could (satirically) have the player as a criminal trading in guns to illustrate how having it easy to obtain legal firearms translates into criminals with guns. In contrast, an anti-control game could have a gun safety tutorial, gun-range training, and a series of simulated situations where the player has a gun in a life threatening situations and saves the day by shooting a criminal.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My view is that satire and political debate is best done with a cool head. Done in a kneejerk fashion it could just confuse, offend and alienate. What's the point if it pushes people to your opposition's side? The first amendment thing is irrelevant to me. I don't come from the US, we have no first amendment. Yes, I think that free speech is good, but within limits. If someone like the Westboro Baptist Church protested at a family member's funeral, I'd want the police to kick them out.

I vaguely recall some games that made good political points, e.g. an educational game on gerrymandering in elections, some game about killing terrorists spreading terrorism, etc. I don't think the genre is a money spinner, but by all means make something. Just keep it small and keep your goals in mind. Often timeliness is of paramount important. A AAA game about a political situation that has months/years ago moved out of public awareness may not achieve much.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Prinz Eugn' timestamp='1345009500' post='4969747']
Retailers are going to stay away, which will counteract any free publicity it will get from being controversial.
[/quote]

You don't need retailers to sell a game nowadays.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems kind of silly to make a game about gun violence when presumably your opposition to the NRA would be rooted in your belief that their existence contributes to actual gun violence, don't you think? If you want to criticize or undermine their stance there are more mature ways to do it.

Personally I'm very much against additional gun controls beyond what we already have, because I believe that every citizen in good standing (meaning, hasn't proven they shouldn't be trusted with a weapon) should have the ultimate right to defend themselves, their loved ones, and their property, using effective means. Law enforcement is great and all, my younger brother is a cop, but they can't always be counted upon to respond quickly enough, or even at all in the case of a widespread or long-lasting emergency situation. In short, by opting out of the ability to protect your own interests, you opt in to the possibility that you might find yourself in a situation where no one can or will protect those interests for you. In the event of a home-invasion, riot, mass panic, Red Dawn, or zombie apocalypse, I'd certainly want to be able to defend myself.

With that, I'll step down from my soap-box. I just wanted to point out that anti-control folks are not all redneck militiamen or irresponsible fools who think it's cool to own a grand-fathered automatic weapon for show. Most anti-control folks are rational people making a very rational decision, even if the scenarios they might cite in justifying their stance might seem only a distant possibility.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Some Idiot']
Yeah I guess not. I guess this series would just make the NRA grab onto their guns even tighter. The natural response of NRA affiliated persons to violence is to load their guns, after all. I thought it might make them stop and think, but I guess I misjudged their rationale for wanting guns. It's not just to defend against crazies... it's to defend against their critics as well.
[/quote]

I'm a member of the NRA. I own three guns: a handgun, a rifle and a shotgun. I hunt elk, when I get lucky enough to draw a tag and have the time to do so. I have never had the inclination, desire, or even random thought to draw a weapon on another human being. I could conceivably do so in defense of self or family, but such a thing would [i]not[/i] be done lightly, if at all. I have far too much respect for the potential destructive power of firearms, and the necessity of using them responsibly. But, yeah, all of us NRA members are crazies. Just a bunch of dumb rednecks, just itching for an excuse to shoot somebody. You, sir, seem to have fallen victim to propaganda, and I truly feel sorry for your lack of critical thinking skills or basic ability to reason for yourself. Sorry you're dumb, bro. Maybe you'll get better.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wrote a big screed on the pros and cons of gun control, and unfortuantely my girlfriend's laptop chose that moment to shutdown without notice. Argh. Anyway, a brief summary below:[list]
[*]There are good uses for guns
[*]There are bad uses for guns
[*]The NRA isn't responsible for every bad use of guns
[*]Learning gun safety and accuracy is good for existing gun owners
[*]The US has a high per capita gun death rate for a first world country
[*]Having more guns doesn't guarantee safety
[*]For some gun owners, proper use of a firearm decreases danger
[*]For some gun owners, a firearm causes overconfidence, and increases danger
[*]Guns have a higher collateral damage rate than most peacetime weapons
[*]Compared to weapons such as knives, tasers, etc, the death rate per incident is high
[*]There are relatively few positive uses for guns in an urban environment (e.g. nothing to hunt)
[*]The chances of collateral damage are higher in an urban environment
[*]The psychological effects of guns can cause quick escalation of arguments
[/list]
Personally I'm fine with gun use for hunting, and small caliber weapon use for home defense. I don't see a societal benefit for people walking around armed, or for automatic weapons.

PS:
@FLeBlanc: I appreciate your frustration at the OP, but try not to respond to ad hominem attacks with ad hominem attacks. It only takes a few posts like that before Godwin's Law gets invoked. ;)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I suppose this is off-topic if we can't bring it back to the design of a game. So I'll make a half-hearted effort.

[quote name='jefferytitan' timestamp='1345068428' post='4969968'][list]
[*]The US has a high per capita gun death rate for a first world country
[/list]
[/quote]

The USA is a strongly Capitalist, somewhat free market country with a large stratification between rich and poor, and a big population. If you don't take those factors into account in your game, I don't think you're going to do the subject justice. One might also wish to consider the historical circumstances of any given country, such as being a rebellious colony that then expanded into a sparsely populated land mass, and also being some semblance of a democracy from the get-go. I think gun ownership issues in the USSR and modern day Russia would probably turn out somewhat different. Ready to write CivGun?

[quote][list]
[*]Guns have a higher collateral damage rate than most peacetime weapons
[/list]
[/quote]

Some do not, in specific combat environments. For instance, the shotgun is the ideal home defense weapon, because it will kill lots of stuff at close quarters with not as much need to aim. It won't penetrate solid walls, killing people you didn't intend to. The sound of the shotgun being loaded is terrifying to an intruder and may cause them to flee before a shot needs to be fired. Any accurate game would need to feature a variety of weapons and defense environments. For instance, a chain gun isn't going to help you in circumstances short of a Steven Segal home defense film.

[quote][list]
[*]Compared to weapons such as knives, tasers, etc, the death rate per incident is high
[/list]
[/quote]

Which from a legal defense standpoint is a good thing. The truth is, if your assailant is dead, and you didn't obviously shoot them in the back or off your property or stand over them emptying an entire clip execution-style into them, then it's your word against his and he's dead. Some countries like the USA are "gun cultures" where juries can be expected to understand and be sympathetic to lethal force via firearm. Such juries think you just pull a trigger, the assailant dies, there isn't a lot of thinking and second guessing about it. In contrast, knives and bare handed martial arts defenses are constantly questioned on a blow-by-blow basis, like everyone fighting for their life is in a Bruce Lee movie. Other cultures are knife or stick cultures, often due to British or other colonial experience, and are not at all sympathetic to the use of guns. Yet they may culturally expect a brutal chopping to be ok, especially say in Indonesia where one can be killed merely for slapping a hat off another man's head. From a game design standpoint again YMMV according to the weapon and the geographic culture.

[quote][list]
[*]There are relatively few positive uses for guns in an urban environment (e.g. nothing to hunt)
[/list]
[/quote]

The most glaring exception being self-defense, especially in the home. Again, are you going to make a sim, or an interactive political tract?

[quote][list]
[*]The psychological effects of guns can cause quick escalation of arguments
[/list]
[/quote]

Or de-escalation, case may be. Guns are excellent standoff weapons, as they clearly demonstrate the potential of lethal force. Knives are pretty good standoff weapons, they can keep some hotheaded confrontations from going any further. Sticks are not so good, at least in the USA. Whether a given weapon and communication style works for ending a confrontation, would depend on a lot of situational factors and would be a pretty complex roleplay. If you want to actually sell a game like this, it might be good to target it at law enforcement, the military, and private security companies - people who would actually pay big bucks for serious depth of sim.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@bvanevery: Fair call for the reminder that this isn't the Lounge. I don't entirely agree, but I'll do my bit to stop polluting this part of the forum.
-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='jefferytitan' timestamp='1345088741' post='4970043']
@bvanevery: Fair call for the reminder that this isn't the Lounge. I don't entirely agree, but I'll do my bit to stop polluting this part of the forum.
[/quote]

[quote name='bvanevery' timestamp='1345087443' post='4970039']
I suppose this is off-topic if we can't bring it back to the design of a game. So I'll make a half-hearted effort.
[list]
[*]Ready to write CivGun?
[*]For instance, a chain gun isn't going to help you in circumstances short of a Steven Segal home defense film.
[*]From a game design standpoint again YMMV according to the weapon and the geographic culture.
[*]Again, are you going to make a sim, or an interactive political tract?
[*]If you want to actually sell a game like this, it might be good to target it at law enforcement, the military, and private security companies - people who would actually pay big bucks for serious depth of sim.
[/list]
[/quote]


Heavens, actually discussing the design of the game per the topic.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Ravyne' timestamp='1345058837' post='4969916']
Law enforcement is great and all, my younger brother is a cop, but they can't always be counted upon to respond quickly enough, or even at all in the case of a widespread or long-lasting emergency situation.
[/quote]

What we need is Batman [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png[/img]

My personal opinion on all of this: Guns are stupid, I like swords better [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png[/img]
-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0