Sign in to follow this  
jerrinx

DX11 FXAA and Color Space

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I know, there were a few topics on FXAA, but it didn't help me with my problem, hence the new thread.

The problem is, I don't see any difference between the FXAA and Non-FXAA Render.

Then again I am not passing a non-linear color space texture to the FXAA shader. And not sure how to.
If my understanding is correct Linear color space is the one that is got when you sample a texture (0 to 1 range or 0 - 255 range) where the colors change in a linear fashion.

I am not sure what sRGB is about ?
Currently my texture is in RGBA8 dx format.

According to Fxaa3.11 release by Timothy.
[b]"Applying FXAA to a framebuffer with linear RGB color will look worse.[/b]
[b]This is very counter intuitive, but happens to be true in this case.
The reason is because dithering artifacts will be more visiable
in a linear colorspace."[/b]
.

The FXAA paper mentions something about using the following in DX9 (which is what i am working on)
[b]// sRGB->linear conversion when fetching from TEX SetSamplerState(sampler, D3DSAMP_SRGBTEXTURE, 1);
// on SetSamplerState(sampler, D3DSAMP_SRGBTEXTURE, 0); // off
// linear->sRGB conversion when writing to ROP SetRenderState(D3DRS_SRGBWRITEENABLE, 1);
// on SetRenderState(D3DRS_SRGBWRITEENABLE, 0); // off[/b]

This is what I am doing.
1. Render to texture using D3DRS_SRGBWRITEENABLE = 1, and turn it off after I am done.
When I render this texture, it looks brighter than usual.
2. Render screen quad with this texture using D3DSAMP_SRGBTEXTURE = 1, and turn it off after I am done.
When this texture renders, it looks correct.

But the aliasing still remains. I figured I shouldn't be doing step two because that would turn the non-linear color to linear while sampling.
But doing that results in the texture/scene got from the first step.

I have attached my shaders here.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

P.S, Timothy also mentioned something about pixel offset being different on dx11 w.r.t dx9 by 0.5 of a pixel.
http://timothylottes.blogspot.com/2011/07/fxaa-311-released.html

Thanks a lot !
Jerry

[attachment=10322:FXAA.zip]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='jerrinx' timestamp='1343587522' post='4964290']
The problem is, I don't see any difference between the FXAA and Non-FXAA Render.
[/quote]
Could you post some comparison screenshots ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh I forgot, about the pics.

I have an abstraction going on for directx9 and opengl2.
So the same window in the pics support both of them.

I got hold of a glsl shader for FXAA and integrated to the opengl side.
(am not sure what version it is, but it appears to be from the same source)

Seems to work. But when I made changes to the directx hlsl with updated inputs, it still doesn't work [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]

I am reattaching all the shaders and the screenshots here.

Note the difference w.r.t the directx screenshots only. The window name holds the name of the renderer
When I use GLSL it works fine.

Thanks
Jerry Edited by jerrinx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The major difference between DX9 and OGL2 is, that DX9 is, well, DX9, but OGL2 can be pimped by using extensions. The FXAA shaders use a lot of extensions, I would test it on a higher DX version, maybe the FXAA implemenation has reached its limits on DX9, or you should choose a preset better suited for DX9.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem with DX9 is that it has the "[url="http://www.google.com/search?q=dx9%20half%20pixel%20offset%20problem"]half pixel offset problem[/url]", which will wreak havoc with any kind of post-processing shader.

The official description of the problem is here:
[url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb219690(v=vs.85).aspx"]http://msdn.microsof...0(v=vs.85).aspx[/url]

In the versions of FXAA that I've used, it expects you to account for this flaw in DX9 yourself and EITHER shift your full-screen vertices OR texture coordinates by half a pixel as described in the MSDN link, so that the pixel shader receives the same interpolated values as it would in GL/DX10/DX11. Edited by Hodgman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you want to understand the linear color space, try to google "gamma correction". Generally speaking, to the monitor, the relationship between luminance and color is not linear, but a Exponential curve. So in order to output the linear color, texture color was also been precorrected by an exponent value. So although you can see the correct color on the screen,the color you used before is nonlinear. This can cause problems in some algrithm,but in my work,the FXAA use nonlinear color space works well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Thanks guys.

Like Hodgman said, My initial setting was 1/2 texel size off on DX9.
After fixing the issue the textures still renders the old jaggy pattern [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]

Initially I noticed some difference in the image when rendering to texture vs normal rendering in the case of DX9.
Now, both look the same. I am assuming the 1/2 texel problem is accounted for.

@dragon.R
I used this article to understand the color space stuff
[url="http://filmicgames.com/archives/299"]http://filmicgames.com/archives/299[/url]

Tried to use the color space as in the Fxaa_3.11 header. But still no dice.

Reattaching updated shaders.

lol... Maybe I should go for SMAA [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]
[url="https://vimeo.com/31247769"]https://vimeo.com/31247769[/url]
Fxaa3 (lower quality 0.62 ms) vs SMAA Tx2 (higher quality 1.32 ms)
Hard to decide

Thanks guys
Jerry Edited by jerrinx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I`ve read your code,you need to #define FXAA_GREEN_AS_LUMA 1,otherwise it will take the alpha of tex color as luminance,as your input alpha is always 1,nothing will be changed. And your parameters seemed to have some problems,try to read the annotation and check them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Managed to port glsl code to hlsl for FXAA.
Seems to work.

Attaching it for people who need it. It looks simpler than the Fxaa 3.11. I am guessing its the old version. But it performs better.
Tried with and without Luma. Works in both cases.

On DX9 you need to do color space conversion, in order to use it correctly.

I do something like this:

Stage 0
Render Main Scene to texture
- Texture Read convert - SRGB to Linear
- Texture Write convert - None

Stage 0.5 (Optional, if filling alpha with luma)
Render Texture to Texture
- Texture Read convert - None
- Texture Write convert - None

Stage 1
Render Texture to Monitor using FXAA
- Texture Read convert - None
- Texture Write convert - Linear to SRGB (as Monitor requires SRGB format)

Hopefully that clarifies some stuff.

For now this works.

@Dragon. Couldn't get the Fxaa 3.11 to work though. I rechecked all the variables, I am not sure whats the problem. if you find something wrong, please tell me. Attaching the updated old one again. Attaching some part of the code, if someone wants to see.

I have a question
FPS drops as follows (@1080p):
- Normal Render (1500 FPS)
- Render To Texture (1000 FPS)
- Texture To Scene with FXAA (500 FPS)
Is that normal ?

Jerry Edited by jerrinx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627646
    • Total Posts
      2978384
  • Similar Content

    • By evelyn4you
      hi,
      i have read very much about the binding of a constantbuffer to a shader but something is still unclear to me.
      e.g. when performing :   vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer,  slot )
       is the buffer bound
      a.  to the VertexShaderStage
      or
      b. to the VertexShader that is currently set as the active VertexShader
      Is it possible to bind a constantBuffer to a VertexShader e.g. VS_A and keep this binding even after the active VertexShader has changed ?
      I mean i want to bind constantbuffer_A  to VS_A, an Constantbuffer_B to VS_B  and  only use updateSubresource without using setConstantBuffer command every time.

      Look at this example:
      SetVertexShader ( VS_A )
      updateSubresource(buffer_A)
      vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer_A,  slot_A )
      perform drawcall       ( buffer_A is used )

      SetVertexShader ( VS_B )
      updateSubresource(buffer_B)
      vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer_B,  slot_A )
      perform drawcall   ( buffer_B is used )
      SetVertexShader ( VS_A )
      perform drawcall   (now which buffer is used ??? )
       
      I ask this question because i have made a custom render engine an want to optimize to
      the minimum  updateSubresource, and setConstantbuffer  calls
       
       
       
       
       
    • By noodleBowl
      I got a quick question about buffers when it comes to DirectX 11. If I bind a buffer using a command like:
      IASetVertexBuffers IASetIndexBuffer VSSetConstantBuffers PSSetConstantBuffers  and then later on I update that bound buffer's data using commands like Map/Unmap or any of the other update commands.
      Do I need to rebind the buffer again in order for my update to take effect? If I dont rebind is that really bad as in I get a performance hit? My thought process behind this is that if the buffer is already bound why do I need to rebind it? I'm using that same buffer it is just different data
       
    • By Rockmover
      I am really stuck with something that should be very simple in DirectX 11. 
      1. I can draw lines using a PC (position, colored) vertices and a simple shader just fine.
      2. I can draw 3D triangles using PCN (position, colored, normal) vertices just fine (even transparency and SpecularBlinnPhong shaders).
       
      However, if I'm using my 3D shader, and I want to draw my PC lines in the same scene how can I do that?
       
      If I change my lines to PCN and pass them to the 3D shader with my triangles, then the lighting screws them all up.  I only want the lighting for the 3D triangles, but no SpecularBlinnPhong/Lighting for the lines (just PC). 
      I am sure this is because if I change the lines to PNC there is not really a correct "normal" for the lines.  
      I assume I somehow need to draw the 3D triangles using one shader, and then "switch" to another shader and draw the lines?  But I have no clue how to use two different shaders in the same scene.  And then are the lines just drawn on top of the triangles, or vice versa (maybe draw order dependent)?  
      I must be missing something really basic, so if anyone can just point me in the right direction (or link to an example showing the implementation of multiple shaders) that would be REALLY appreciated.
       
      I'm also more than happy to post my simple test code if that helps as well!
       
      THANKS SO MUCH IN ADVANCE!!!
    • By Reitano
      Hi,
      I am writing a linear allocator of per-frame constants using the DirectX 11.1 API. My plan is to replace the traditional constant allocation strategy, where most of the work is done by the driver behind my back, with a manual one inspired by the DirectX 12 and Vulkan APIs.
      In brief, the allocator maintains a list of 64K pages, each page owns a constant buffer managed as a ring buffer. Each page has a history of the N previous frames. At the beginning of a new frame, the allocator retires the frames that have been processed by the GPU and frees up the corresponding space in each page. I use DirectX 11 queries for detecting when a frame is complete and the ID3D11DeviceContext1::VS/PSSetConstantBuffers1 methods for binding constant buffers with an offset.
      The new allocator appears to be working but I am not 100% confident it is actually correct. In particular:
      1) it relies on queries which I am not too familiar with. Are they 100% reliable ?
      2) it maps/unmaps the constant buffer of each page at the beginning of a new frame and then writes the mapped memory as the frame is built. In pseudo code:
      BeginFrame:
          page.data = device.Map(page.buffer)
          device.Unmap(page.buffer)
      RenderFrame
          Alloc(size, initData)
              ...
              memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
          Alloc(size, initData)
              ...
              memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
      (Note: calling Unmap at the end of a frame prevents binding the mapped constant buffers and triggers an error in the debug layer)
      Is this valid ? 
      3) I don't fully understand how many frames I should keep in the history. My intuition says it should be equal to the maximum latency reported by IDXGIDevice1::GetMaximumFrameLatency, which is 3 on my machine. But, this value works fine in an unit test while on a more complex demo I need to manually set it to 5, otherwise the allocator starts overwriting previous frames that have not completed yet. Shouldn't the swap chain Present method block the CPU in this case ?
      4) Should I expect this approach to be more efficient than the one managed by the driver ? I don't have meaningful profile data yet.
      Is anybody familiar with the approach described above and can answer my questions and discuss the pros and cons of this technique based on his experience ? 
      For reference, I've uploaded the (WIP) allocator code at https://paste.ofcode.org/Bq98ujP6zaAuKyjv4X7HSv.  Feel free to adapt it in your engine and please let me know if you spot any mistakes
      Thanks
      Stefano Lanza
       
    • By Matt Barr
      Hey all. I've been working with compute shaders lately, and was hoping to build out some libraries to reuse code. As a prerequisite for my current project, I needed to sort a big array of data in my compute shader, so I was going to implement quicksort as a library function. My implementation was going to use an inout array to apply the changes to the referenced array.

      I spent half the day yesterday debugging in visual studio before I realized that the solution, while it worked INSIDE the function, reverted to the original state after returning from the function.

      My hack fix was just to inline the code, but this is not a great solution for the future.  Any ideas? I've considered just returning an array of ints that represents the sorted indices.
  • Popular Now