# OpenGL Opengl having issues with Intel HD3000

## Recommended Posts

Hi All,

We have an app which shows geometry in 3D using Opengl 3.0. It seems to work fine on all machine (aparently all had NVIDIA cards n drivers) till i got a Dell machine with Intel HD 3000 card (8.15.10.2418). This machine doesn't seem to render the objects properly. please have a look at the two images, i have attached, to see what i mean.

And i am not using anything fancy here. Its just stripes of GL_QUAD_STRIP kind.

Right now i have 8.15.10.2418(which i got from manufacturer(DELL) website on someone's suggestion) but prior to that i had 8.15.10.2656 (lates on Intels website) and the results were the same.
Any pointers would be highly appreciated as we want to support as many kinds of machine/laptops.
(i haven't seen this issue on any other driver yet)

##### Share on other sites
Intel's drivers are famous for not supporting OpenGL properly. You could try using DirectX if you want to support Intel cards, which is supposed to work somewhat better.

##### Share on other sites
So far as Intel is concerned, GL_QUAD_STRIP actually [i]is[/i] quite fancy: it's one of those weird old GL1.x primitive layouts that would need to be converted to triangles in the driver, it doesn't exist in D3D so it breaks the general rule of "with Intel if it's not in D3D then don't even try doing it in GL", and it's also been deprecated from more recent GL_VERSIONs. So convert it to an indexed triangle list and it should work just fine.

##### Share on other sites
Thanks for the replies guys..
as i tried your suggestions i figured out that the problem lies somewhere else......
if you look at the pic above, you would notice that there are two faces to the image.. if i draw just the front face of it.. it draws perfectly fine (even with GL_QUAD_STRIP as well as if i use triangle). So it seems using GL_QUAD_STRIP is not the problem. The weird effect comes when i draw the back face of the image. It seems the back face somehow interferes with the front face and gives this weird effect. And this happens just with this Intel HD3000 card only.

Can you think of any reason how this can happen with this card/driver?

##### Share on other sites
[quote name='dgusain' timestamp='1343746647' post='4964886']
Thanks for the replies guys..
as i tried your suggestions i figured out that the problem lies somewhere else......
if you look at the pic above, you would notice that there are two faces to the image.. if i draw just the front face of it.. it draws perfectly fine (even with GL_QUAD_STRIP as well as if i use triangle). So it seems using GL_QUAD_STRIP is not the problem. The weird effect comes when i draw the back face of the image. It seems the back face somehow interferes with the front face and gives this weird effect. And this happens just with this Intel HD3000 card only.

Can you think of any reason how this can happen with this card/driver?
[/quote]

that is possible z fighting. it may be the result of poor quality drivers (ie. intel). A year ago I had to work with intel and ogl and I had really bad experience with them.

##### Share on other sites
[quote name='dgusain' timestamp='1343746647' post='4964886']
Can you think of any reason how this can happen with this card/driver?
[/quote]

Historically, any time you try to do something "not what people are usually doing," or in this case what an IHV (Intel) is doing, you get yourself into trouble. This is because infrequently used stuff is not tested very well, so bugs aren't even perceived, let alone fixed. So, the original advice that another poster gave is not wrong. Try implementing a test program that uses triangle strip primitives instead of quads, and see if the problem goes away. It could be that Intel supports some quad stuff, but when you get into double sided quads, someone slacked off on the driver implementation and it is not done well. I would point out that quads are not inherently flat, so it's easy to see how a driver could do a quick-and-dirty conversion to triangles, pick baloney normals, and thus z-fight. YMMV for how flat your quads really are, how "pixel perfect" the driver tries to be, etc.

## Create an account

Register a new account

• ## Partner Spotlight

• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
627667
• Total Posts
2978532
• ### Similar Content

• Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using glMapBuffer(), which works fine.
But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using glMapBufferRange(), which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
• By xhcao
Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness.
• By cebugdev
hi guys,
are there any books, link online or any other resources that discusses on how to build special effects such as magic, lightning, etc. in OpenGL? i mean, yeah most of them are using particles but im looking for resources specifically on how to manipulate the particles to look like an effect that can be use for games,. i did fire particle before, and I want to learn how to do the other 'magic' as well.
Like are there one book or link(cant find in google) that atleast featured how to make different particle effects in OpenGL (or DirectX)? If there is no one stop shop for it, maybe ill just look for some tips on how to make a particle engine that is flexible enough to enable me to design different effects/magic
let me know if you guys have recommendations.
• By dud3
How do we rotate the camera around x axis 360 degrees, without having the strange effect as in my video below?
Mine behaves exactly the same way spherical coordinates would, I'm using euler angles.
Tried googling, but couldn't find a proper answer, guessing I don't know what exactly to google for, googled 'rotate 360 around x axis', got no proper answers.

References:
Code: https://pastebin.com/Hcshj3FQ
The video shows the difference between blender and my rotation:

• By Defend
I've had a Google around for this but haven't yet found some solid advice. There is a lot of "it depends", but I'm not sure on what.
My question is what's a good rule of thumb to follow when it comes to creating/using VBOs & VAOs? As in, when should I use multiple or when should I not? My understanding so far is that if I need a new VBO, then I need a new VAO. So when it comes to rendering multiple objects I can either:
* make lots of VAO/VBO pairs and flip through them to render different objects, or
* make one big VBO and jump around its memory to render different objects.
I also understand that if I need to render objects with different vertex attributes, then a new VAO is necessary in this case.
If that "it depends" really is quite variable, what's best for a beginner with OpenGL, assuming that better approaches can be learnt later with better understanding?

• 10
• 10
• 12
• 22
• 13