# OpenGL Rotate flat surface in 3D space

This topic is 1982 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

Ok, I am new to OpenGL and I am having a bit of trouble:

currently I am rotating a texture by using glRotate on the vertex's

[CODE]
GL.Rotate(45, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0);
GL.Begin(BeginMode.Polygon);
GL.TexCoord2(0, 0);
GL.Vertex2(ULx, ULy);
GL.TexCoord2(1, 0);
GL.Vertex2(URx, URy);
GL.TexCoord2(1, 1);
GL.Vertex2(BRx, BRy);
GL.TexCoord2(0, 1);
GL.Vertex2(BLx, BLy);
GL.End();
[/CODE]

This works fine, but since it is just a 2d matrix operation all of the rotations are pretty much squashing the texture (it doesn't look like the far side is far away), in the example, I would expect the top to have a smaller width than the bottom width, because it is visible but further away.

this isn't the case, and I understand why (I've taken Linear Algebra :-P)

I am looking to create a 3D FLAT object, would it be a cube where one side is 0 width?
and I want to rotate it in 3D space where the perspective is correct.

I don't really know how to accomplish this yet, most of the code I find makes 3D cubes (although I am having trouble placing my texture on it).

Any help is appreciated.

thanks. Edited by Krum110487

##### Share on other sites
No idea what you are talking about. What is a flat 3D object? a 2d object...?... a 3d plane?
Using 2D instead of 3D in your gl calls means you dont get perspective, and your objects are 2d.

##### Share on other sites
If you use glVertex2(x,y) then it is equivalent to the use of glVertex3(x,y,0) what is itself equivalent to glVertex(x,y,0,1). It has no effect on the dimensionality of the space or what. Whether or not perspective can be seen is a question of the projection matrix. E.g. using glOrtho defines an orthogonal projection, while glFrustum defines a perspective projection. There are perhaps some utility functions for projection, too.

##### Share on other sites
Sorry, I am still getting used to the terminology, by flat 3d object I mean a 3d plane.

since I have posted I just realized the I was using projection (not that it matters, since what I want is perspective, and even in model view it had none).

@haegarr, you have pretty much told me what I needed to know, I am still getting used to this, I will dig around in Frustrum and such for a while see what I figure out.

I also just got a handle on units (sort of), I think you will see less and less of me as things finally click [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]

thanks for the information!

##### Share on other sites
There are 2 matrices. Projection and Modelview. You set them up separately. glMatrixMode(). A modelview matrix does not have a projection matrix.

##### Share on other sites
That is good to know, Thanks!

• ### Similar Content

• By _OskaR
Hi,
I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
• By xhcao
Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
My simple code is as below,
glUseProgram(program.get());
glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
// Does sync be needed here?
glUseProgram(0);
GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);

Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?

• My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:

• I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.

#define NUM_LIGHTS 2
struct Light
{
vec3 position;
vec3 diffuse;
float attenuation;
};
uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];

• By pr033r
Hello,
I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things.
I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help.
My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
Thanks for any help...

• 9
• 14
• 16
• 10
• 17