Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Why do I need GLSL?

This topic is 1973 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I don't understand why I need to learn GLSL.
What are some stuff that is not possible to do in normal OpenGL, but possible with GLSL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My 'normal' I assume you mean fixed-function pipeline.

Here's a good example: Steep Parallax Mapping:

[url="http://graphics.cs.brown.edu/games/SteepParallax/"]http://graphics.cs.brown.edu/games/SteepParallax/[/url]

They show 4 images. Texture mapping is done in basic fixed-function opengl. You can also do some normal mapping in fixed-function opengl extensions. Even per-pixel normal mapping through the dot-product texture combiner. If you set the right opengl options and parameters, you can do some pretty cool looking stuff.

But the last two, parallel mapping, and steep parallax mapping, require very specific, per-pixel operations. These operations are written in GLSL. Before GLSL, everything you needed OpenGL to do has to have been thought of before hand and built into opengl. Examples are things like turning lights on and off, adjusting fog, etc. It's all pre-made, and all you do is turn it on or off and set some parameters. GLSL lets you ADD and invent[b] NEW[/b] things the creators of OpenGL never thought of yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"normal OpenGL" (AKA fixed function) is deprecated and emulated on modern GPUs. When you use fixed function rendering, then you're simply using the driver's basic built-in GLSL routines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GLSL isn't necessary, as the drivers still allow the fixed function rendering. But if you want your application to execute on OpenGL ES, then there is no option.

Or if you want to realize the full power of modern graphics, then you also need GLSL.

If you want to learn and understand better what 3D graphics is, so that you can maybe get a job, then you need to know the modern way. Learning 3D programming with the fixed function pipeline is partly wasted, as it is done differently now, you will have to re-learn again.

See [url="http://www.arcsynthesis.org/gltut/"]Learning Modern 3D Graphics Programming[/url] or [url="http://www.opengl-tutorial.org/"]http://www.opengl-tutorial.org/[/url] for a good tutorials. Learning OpenGL requires a lot of effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While it may be easier to get off the ground with out GLSL, GLSL is just so powerful. It's like the difference between a tricycle and a sports car.

I'm personally a fan of its hardware accelerated image processing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='lride' timestamp='1345680707' post='4972429']
I don't understand why I need to learn GLSL.
What are some stuff that is not possible to do in normal OpenGL, but possible with GLSL
[/quote]
For modern OpenGL development there is no practical difference between GLSL (or more broadly, shaders, for which GLSL is a language to write shaders) and OpenGL.

Originally when OpenGL was conceived graphic processing units were only capable of performing a fixed-set of operations. Thus, OpenGL's API was designed to only expose what the graphic cards were capable of doing, and this it what came to be called the fixed function pipeline. But as time has passed, graphic processing units have evolved. They no longer expose just a fixed-set of operations; they still have a small set of fixed operations, but now also include the ability to be programmed (similar to how we can program our CPUs with C or C++ or Java or <insert favourite language>). The ability to program a GPU is important because now what is possible to do with a GPU is much less limited. However, we need a way to be able to program the GPUs, and hence OpenGL has evolved alongside the GPUs capabilities; this is why shaders were introduced.

The bottom line is that GLSL is only necessary to learn if you intend to use features that are beyond the capabilities of the fixed function pipeline. Vaguely, the fixed function pipeline is only capable of fog, vertex lighting, coloring, and texturing. If you're requirements are more sophisticated than that, then you need shaders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now