Public Group

# Point-Plane distance

This topic is 2301 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

Hello.
I am following WildBunny's tutorial regarding a simple physics engine :
http://www.wildbunny...es-for-dummies/
However, I have some trouble understanding this part :

"
for all particles i { for all planes j { distance = P.x*Planes[j].a + P.y*Planes[j].b + Planes[j].c; if (distance < 0) { // collision responce } } }
What this code is doing is finding, by projection, how much of the [color=#ff0000]vector from the plane to the particle is in the direction of the plane normal."

If every particle is determined by its (x,y) point, isn't this a vector from the origin to that point ?

This line :
"distance = P.x*Planes[j].a + P.y*Planes[j].b + Planes[j].c"
doesnt actually compute the dot product of the origin-point vector and plane normal rather than the plane-point(vector) and normal dot-product?

I drew some sketches so you can see my point.I am testing a particle against the plane who's normal isnt normalized .
[Sorry, I actually mean dot-product , not cross ] .

I know there's a flaw in my reasoning, but I dont seem to get it . Edited by cold_heats_.--.

##### Share on other sites
"Plane" is a really odd name for a line on a plane. Actually, I think those objects should be called half-planes, because they seem to be the sets of points that satisfy Ax+By+C<0.

I don't understand your question at all. There is no cross product in 2D. All the code is doing is checking which particles seem to violate some constraints, with each constraint expressed as a half plane of forbidden positions.

##### Share on other sites
@alvaro , the author does specify they are actually lines when we refer to 2D.
My question is why does he say he computes the dot product between the vector-from-the-plane-to-point and plane-normal , if the line
" distance = P.x*Planes[j].a + P.y*Planes[j].b + Planes[j].c; " calculates the dot product between the vector-from-the-origin-to-point and the plane-normal ?

##### Share on other sites
We have already established that the author is not tremendously careful with language, so I wouldn't worry a whole lot about the exact wording. That said, he is basically right. The formula for the "the dot product between the vector-from-the-origin-to-point and the plane-normal" wouldn't have `+ Planes[j].c]' at the end.

1. 1
2. 2
Rutin
17
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5

• 13
• 26
• 10
• 11
• 9
• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
633735
• Total Posts
3013593
×