• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mathias_L

GLSL-PingPong-Rendering - strange performance issue

5 posts in this topic

Hi there,

I do some calculations on the GPU by rendering a quad into a FBO. The result is subsequently submitted back to GPU for further processing.
The result looks fine but due to some strange mistake I seem to make, it runs very slow (below 1 fps). But when I include a "glReadPixels" call after rendering the quad, the performance goes up to 20 fps (the result of the calculation stays absolutely the same!). But since I don't want to access the data on CPU between the two shader calls, I don't need to acces the pixels and therefore there should be no need for a glReadPixels call. The result of the glReadPixels call is not even read by the program and I only need to read a one-pixel-region to get this effect (see comments below). I have no Idea how this strange behaviour could be explained.

The relevant code is posted below. I used an FBO without an attached depth buffer, only a rgba-texture. The functions "renderToFBO" and "submitToGPU" are called subsequently. If you are interested in initialzation code or something, please let me know. I figured out, that the performance issue is not related to the glsl-shader code.

Thanks for your answers.
[source lang="cpp"]// RenderTarget - Type:

typedef struct {
bool isAllocated;
bool hasDepthBuffer;
GLuint color_tex;
GLuint fb; // FBO
GLuint depthBuffer;
GLsizei width;
GLsizei height;
TextureType textureType;
} RenderTarget;

// ------------------ render to FBO ---------------------

void RenderTargetContainer :: renderToFBO(RenderTarget *rt) {
glBindFramebufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT, rt->fb);
glViewport(0,0, rt->width, rt->height);

glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);

glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION);
glLoadIdentity();
gluOrtho2D(0.0, rt->width, 0.0, rt->height);

glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW);
glLoadIdentity();

glBegin(GL_QUADS);
glVertex2f(0.0, 0.0);
glVertex2f(static_cast <float> (rt->width), 0.0);
glVertex2f(static_cast <float> (rt->width),static_cast <float> (rt->height));
glVertex2f(0.0, static_cast <float> (rt->height));
glEnd();

// -- these two lines make it run fast
// -- although the visible result statys the same.
// -- "foo" will never be read.
// -- region needs to be at least 1 to get the speed up effect.
static float foo[4];
glReadPixels(0, 0, 1, 1, GL_RGBA, GL_FLOAT, foo);
}

// ------------------ submit result to GPU ---------------------

void RenderTargetContainer :: submitToGPU(GLint shaderVarLocation, int textureUnit, RenderTarget *rt) {
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0 + textureUnit);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB, rt->color_tex);
glUniform1i(shaderVarLocation, textureUnit);
}[/source]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh sorry, I didnt... I was just checking for glsl errors...
What could it mean that i got an invalid operation error (0x502) at the very beginning of my Program?

[source lang="cpp"]int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nShowCmd)
{
checkErr(); // GL_INVALID_OPERATION !!!!!!!!

MSG msg = {0};
WNDCLASSEX wcl = {0};

wcl.cbSize = sizeof(wcl);
wcl.style = CS_OWNDC | CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW;
wcl.lpfnWndProc = WindowProc;
wcl.cbClsExtra = 0;
wcl.cbWndExtra = 0;
wcl.hInstance = g_hInstance = hInstance;
wcl.hIcon = LoadIcon(0, IDI_APPLICATION);
wcl.hCursor = LoadCursor(0, IDC_ARROW);
wcl.hbrBackground = 0;
wcl.lpszMenuName = MAKEINTRESOURCE(MENU_FIXED_FUNC);
wcl.lpszClassName = "GLWindowClass";
wcl.hIconSm = 0;

if (!RegisterClassEx(&wcl))
return 0;
......[/source]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Calling glGetError without a context is invalid, as it is a gl function and you should have the context before calling it. And have you tried calling glFinish() or glFlush() after the operations?

I'm also wondering what you mean by "submitting the results to GPU", if you never read back the texture data to CPU won't you just keep working on the same data? The piece of code you commented as submitting the results just binds another texture. Edited by powly k
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you, calling glFinish() after rendering the quad made it run fast so that I don't need the glReadPixels-hack anymore! Seems like glReadPixels does something like glFinish internally.

(btw. Putting glGetError at locations behind context creation also removed any gl-errors [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img] )

[quote]I'm also wondering what you mean by "submitting the results to GPU", if you never read back the texture data to CPU won't you just keep working on the same data? The piece of code you commented as submitting the results just binds another texture.[/quote]
I'm not deep into that but I think it's like this:
The texture data doesn't need to be transferred to the CPU, since after rendering the quad the data is inside the texture memory on GPU - binding the texture and sending the texture unit via glUniform to the shader allows accessing the texture memory on GPU where the texture data still is.
(Is that right?) Edited by Mathias_L
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh, it's correct. The term "submit" was what alarmed me, but it's not totally wrong because even though you don't run your data through the CPU, you do tell where in VRAM the data will be found.

And glReadPixels ought to have a glFinish inside, otherwise it could read when the image is still being rendered and return very weird results :)
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0