Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
ic0de

Particles on the GPU

This topic is 2195 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

So I just figured out how to make a rocket launcher work in terms of physics and now I need to make a kick ass trail of smoke and flames to complete it.

I know making particle effects are pretty straightforward but I was wondering If there was a way to not only render but also simulate particles on the GPU. Seeing as the particles don't affect gameplay whatsoever I assumed this was possible. I expected that I could make an emitter object on the CPU side and the GPU would take over the rest after being fed the position of the emitter. Could anyone possibly point me in the right direction for how to have the GPU actually create polygons without having them fed from the cpu?

Thanks. Edited by ic0de

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
A Geometry shader can create polygons on the GPU. The most important question, however, is do you need the particles to collide with the level geometry? (if so you'd need to have the entire physics level on the gpu etc and I don't think it would be worth it. If your particles just follow some mathmatic trajectory (say they just have position, velocity, and acceleration) then you could just pass those to the GPU once and let the GPU integrate the new position each frame quite easily. If you're working in 2D or can use point sprites you don't even need a geometry shader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Geometry shader can create polygons on the GPU. The most important question, however, is do you need the particles to collide with the level geometry? (if so you'd need to have the entire physics level on the gpu etc and I don't think it would be worth it.


my particles simply float downward and fade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be doable then smile.png Is the game 3D or 2D?


100% 3d. I just don't wan't to consume bandwidth sending a bunch of little polygons to the gpu if they could be done on the gpu itself

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What GL version you targeting?


I'm targeting GL 2.1 as far as I know there should be an extension for geometry shaders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As long as your particles are just quads it will be much easier (and more efficient) to use point sprites. I'd suggest you look into them before you go diving into geometry shaders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='zacaj' timestamp='1347929593' post='4981083']
What GL version you targeting?


I'm targeting GL 2.1 as far as I know there should be an extension for geometry shaders
[/quote]

Nvidia will have support for it under 2.1 and IIRC AMD with DX10 class hardware, but you can forget about Intel.... unless it supports GL3+ explicitly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
man, intel can be so difficult sometimes. I guess intel will need to have a little bit more cpu work

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!