• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mental.breakdance

2D tile-based collision engine - ideas for improvement?

6 posts in this topic

Hi all!

Just made a collision engine for my 2D tile based game, pieced together from what I've found/learnt from sites like this. Currently it works well enough, but I fear that with my limited testing, it's probably a bit buggy and not very well optimised. It may even be totally the wrong approach lol..

As such I thought I'd share it up for others to use & perhaps find ways to improve!

I'm using it for a platformer style game where each character has a collision rectangle, and the main thing that it does that may be a bit unorthodox is that they are allowed to 'step' up and down tiles depending on the height of the step (in tiles). This is because for my game, each tile is effectively a pixel of the level texture, and for ramps I don't want the character to have to jump up or fall down each pixel.

Things I already know about & haven't had the time to fix/implement:[list]
[*][bug] there's definitely some issues with stepping down into gaps the same width as the rectangle (i.e. dropping too early)
[*][bug] the rectangle doesn't fit into holes the exact same width as it. They do however fit into holes the same height.
[*][bug/feature] Rectangles cannot 'step' down through zones the exact same height as themselves - i.e. if there is *just* enough room in a tunnel for the rectangle to get through, it would need to move down by itself rather than step - probably just a matter of not checking the top row of tiles when it is possible to step down..
[*][tidy] The 'Move' methods are almost exact duplicates of each other - I'm a bit OCD about avoiding code duplication and this irritates me [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/dry.png[/img]
[*][performance] It can probably be heavily optimised!
[*][possible bug] I haven't tested this in any tilesize other than (1f, 1f)...
[/list]
Anyway, here it is:

[CODE]public interface ITile
{
bool Passable{ get; }
}

public interface ILevel
{
Vector2 TileSize{ get; }
ITile GetTileAt( int x, int y );
}

public class CollisionEngine : MonoBehaviour
{
//TODO: null check all level tile access (could be out of range)
public class CollisionResults
{
public bool CollidedX = false;
public bool CollidedY = false;
}
private ILevel m_level = null;

public CollisionEngine( Level level )
{
m_level = level;
}

private Vector2 UpdatePosition( Rect rect, Vector2 moveAmount, int maxStepAmount, out CollisionResults results )
{
Vector2 resultantPos = new Vector2( rect.x, rect.y );
results = new CollisionResults();
bool hasStepped = false;
if( moveAmount.x != 0 )
{
int totalStepAmount = 0;
int startMinY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMin, false );
int startMaxY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMax, true );
if( moveAmount.x < 0 ) // moving left
{
int startMinX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMin, false );
int endMinX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMin + moveAmount.x, false );
for( int x = startMinX; x > endMinX; --x )
{
float xDistThisIteration = (float)(x - startMinX) * m_level.TileSize.x;
int steppedAmount;
results.CollidedX = MoveLeft( GetColumnIdx( rect.xMin + xDistThisIteration, false ), // left
startMaxY, // top
GetColumnIdx( rect.xMax + xDistThisIteration, true ), // right
startMinY, // bottom
maxStepAmount,
out steppedAmount );
if( results.CollidedX )
{
// can't move left
resultantPos.x = (float)x * m_level.TileSize.x;
break;
}
else
{
totalStepAmount += steppedAmount;
startMinY += steppedAmount;
startMaxY += steppedAmount;
}
}
}
else // moving right
{
int startMaxX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMax, true );
int endMaxX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMax + moveAmount.x, true );
for( int x = startMaxX; x < endMaxX; ++x )
{
float xDistThisIteration = (float)(x - startMaxX) * m_level.TileSize.x;
int steppedAmount;
results.CollidedX = MoveRight( GetColumnIdx( rect.xMin + xDistThisIteration, false ), // left
startMaxY, // top
GetColumnIdx( rect.xMax + xDistThisIteration, true ), // right
startMinY, // bottom
maxStepAmount,
out steppedAmount );
if( results.CollidedX )
{
resultantPos.x = ((float)(x + 1) * m_level.TileSize.x) - rect.width;
break;
}
else
{
totalStepAmount += steppedAmount;
startMinY += steppedAmount;
startMaxY += steppedAmount;
}
}
}
if( !results.CollidedX )
{
resultantPos.x = rect.xMin + moveAmount.x;
}
if( totalStepAmount != 0 )
{
resultantPos.y = Mathf.Floor( rect.yMin ) + ((float)(totalStepAmount) * m_level.TileSize.y);
hasStepped = true;
}
}
if( moveAmount.y != 0 &&
!hasStepped )
{
int startMinX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMin, false );
int startMaxX = GetColumnIdx( rect.xMax, true );
if( moveAmount.y < 0 ) // moving down
{
int startMinY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMin, false );
int endMinY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMin + moveAmount.y, false );
for( int y = startMinY; y > endMinY; --y )
{
float yDistThisIteration = (float)(y - startMinY) * m_level.TileSize.y;
results.CollidedY = MoveDown( startMinX, // left
GetRowIdx( rect.yMax + yDistThisIteration, true ), // top
startMaxX, // right
GetRowIdx( rect.yMin + yDistThisIteration, false ) ); // bottom
if( results.CollidedY )
{
// can't move down
resultantPos.y = (float)y * m_level.TileSize.y;
break;
}
}
}
else // moving up
{
int startMaxY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMax, true );
int endMaxY = GetRowIdx( rect.yMax + moveAmount.y, true );
for( int y = startMaxY; y < endMaxY; ++y )
{
float yDistThisIteration = (float)(y - startMaxY) * m_level.TileSize.y;
results.CollidedY = MoveUp( startMinX, // left
GetRowIdx( rect.yMax + yDistThisIteration, true ), // top
startMaxX, // right
GetRowIdx( rect.yMin + yDistThisIteration, false ) ); // bottom
if( results.CollidedY )
{
// can't move up
resultantPos.y = ((float)(y + 1) * m_level.TileSize.y) - rect.height;
break;
}
}
}
if( !results.CollidedY )
{
resultantPos.y = rect.yMin + moveAmount.y;
}
}
return resultantPos;
}

private bool MoveLeft( int left, int top, int right, int bottom, int maxStepAmount, out int steppedAmount )
{
bool collided = false;
steppedAmount = 0;
for( int y = bottom; y <= top; ++y )
{
if( !m_level.GetTileAt( left - 1, y ).Passable )
{
// try to step up the tiles if they're within stepping range
if( y < bottom + maxStepAmount )
{
steppedAmount = y - bottom + 1;
}
else
{
collided = true;
break;
}
}
}
if( !collided )
{
if( steppedAmount == 0 &&
!m_level.GetTileAt( right + 1, bottom - 1 ).Passable ) // otherwise we would try to step down while completely airborne
{
// check if we can drop within stepping distance
for( int yStep = 0; yStep < maxStepAmount + 1; ++yStep )
{
if( !MoveDown( left - 1, top - yStep, right - 1, bottom - yStep ) )
{
// if we're not on the last iteration (i.e. too far to step)
if( yStep != maxStepAmount )
{
steppedAmount = -yStep - 1;
}
else
{
steppedAmount = 0;
}
}
}
}
else
{
for( int yStep = 0; yStep < steppedAmount; ++yStep )
{
collided = MoveUp( left, top + yStep, right, bottom + yStep );
if( collided )
{
steppedAmount = 0;
break;
}
}
}
}
return collided;
}

private bool MoveRight( int left, int top, int right, int bottom, int maxStepAmount, out int steppedAmount )
{
bool collided = false;
steppedAmount = 0;
for( int y = bottom; y <= top; ++y )
{
if( !m_level.GetTileAt( right + 1, y ).Passable )
{
// try to step up the tiles if they're within stepping range
if( y < bottom + maxStepAmount )
{
steppedAmount = y - bottom + 1;
}
else
{
collided = true;
break;
}
}
}
if( !collided )
{
if( steppedAmount == 0 &&
!m_level.GetTileAt( left - 1, bottom - 1 ).Passable ) // otherwise we would try to step down while completely airborne
{
// check if we can drop within stepping distance
for( int yStep = 0; yStep < maxStepAmount + 1; ++yStep )
{
if( !MoveDown( left + 1, top - yStep, right + 1, bottom - yStep ) )
{
// if we're not on the last iteration (i.e. too far to step)
if( yStep != maxStepAmount )
{
steppedAmount = -yStep - 1;
}
else
{
steppedAmount = 0;
}
}
}
}
else
{
for( int yStep = 0; yStep < steppedAmount; ++yStep )
{
collided = MoveUp( left, top + yStep, right, bottom + yStep );
if( collided )
{
steppedAmount = 0;
break;
}
}
}
}
return collided;
}

private bool MoveUp( int left, int top, int right, int bottom )
{
bool collided = false;
for( int x = left; x <= right; ++x )
{
if( !m_level.GetTileAt( x, top + 1 ).Passable )
{
collided = true;
break;
}
}
return collided;
}

private bool MoveDown( int left, int top, int right, int bottom )
{
bool collided = false;
for( int x = left; x <= right; ++x )
{
if( !m_level.GetTileAt( x, bottom - 1 ).Passable )
{
collided = true;
break;
}
}
return collided;
}

/// <param name="roundDown">Return the left column index if we are perfectly between columns, as opposed to the right.</param>
private int GetColumnIdx( float worldPosX, bool roundDown )
{
// cater for floating point inaccuracies - if we are aligned to a column we don't want to incorrectly position ourselves in the next one.
float xf = worldPosX / m_level.TileSize.x;
int xIdx;
if( Mathf.Approximately( xf, Mathf.Round( xf ) ) )
{
xIdx = roundDown ? (Mathf.RoundToInt( xf ) - 1) : (Mathf.RoundToInt( xf ));
}
else
{
xIdx = Mathf.FloorToInt( xf );
}
return Mathf.Clamp( xIdx, 0, m_level.Columns - 1 );
}

/// <param name="roundDown">Return the lower row index if we are perfectly between columns, as opposed to the right.</param>
private int GetRowIdx( float worldPosY, bool roundDown )
{
// cater for floating point inaccuracies - if we are aligned to a row we don't want to incorrectly position ourselves in the next one.
float yf = worldPosY / m_level.TileSize.y;
int yIdx;
if( Mathf.Approximately( yf, Mathf.Round( yf ) ) )
{
yIdx = roundDown ? (Mathf.RoundToInt( yf ) - 1) : (Mathf.RoundToInt( yf ));
}
else
{
yIdx = Mathf.FloorToInt( yf );
}
return Mathf.Clamp( yIdx, 0, m_level.Rows - 1 );
}
}[/CODE]

Any feedback welcome [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is almost unreadable.

Personally I would just do a callback querry for every ingame object. The callback would check for collisions; each collision would map to a different state and/or manipulate a set of data within the object. Edited by kd7tck
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='kd7tck' timestamp='1348289590' post='4982575']
This is almost unreadable.

Personally I would just do a callback querry for every ingame object. The callback would check for collisions; each collision would map to a different state and/or manipulate a set of data within the object.
[/quote]

Ok so what you're saying is that the resultant movement should be handled by the game objects themselves and the collision engine should just stick to what its name implies - telling the game object whether it is colliding, what it is colliding with, and any related details that may be of use.. is that right?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct, each object will want to react to collisions differently. Every game loop check for collisions, if there are no collisions then don't bother with the callbacks this time around. Make sure to use the Observer pattern, google it if you don't know what it means.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cool thanks! I'll post my second attempt when done - could be a while, as I'm working on loads of other things in the meantime. At the moment it works 'well enough' [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/dry.png[/img]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My suggestion would be to remove the specific Move<SomeDirection> functions, and just use a Move function. You player should have an x and y velocity, and you're movements and collision checking should be based on that. It will make the code much cleaner.

I have replied to similar questions, and you can find them [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/629260-coding-jump-for-a-2d-python-game/page__p__4967145#entry4967145"]Here[/url] and [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/629326-going-crazy-collision-detection/"]Here[/url]

Good luck, and have fun.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0