• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
SawSGM

Collision environment inside a mesh (e.g. cave)

5 posts in this topic

I was wondering how one would go about creating a collision system
for an environment inside an object - such as a cave.

The problem is the cave is too bumpy and hence complex to model it's bounding volume
by hand (although possible, so it is my last resort).

I am familiar with BVH, AABB, and OBB, but again, the shape complexity doesn't allow
easy creation of such objects, and i'm unsure of how to do.
Any advice/tips are welcome.


Note:
I am not 100% this is the right forum to post in, but it seem like it would fit most.



Yours,
SawSGM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How accurate does it need to be? You may be able to do it with overlapping convex collision surfaces. A flat surface, some walls and a few spherical lumps and bumps. Will your players notice a lack of exact collision geometry?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It should be accurate enough, doesn't have to be 100%.

I'm not I understood your idea, but it sounds like i'll have to test against many shapes
(surface, walls, spheres), not to mention it will have to be created through the
modeling application as well (which is possible, but only if it's not complex,
and I still prefer not to) - sounds like it will be better if i'll just check collision of the player box
against the cave faces.

I might misunderstood your idea.
I would appreciate it if you could post some kind of picture
that would explain your idea better.

Yours,
SawSGM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There's no such thing as "accurate collision". Even AAA games such as Unreal Tournament uses simplified collision geometry ([url="http://udn.epicgames.com/Three/CollisionReference.html"]end of the page[/url]).
In the past, I've experimented using two heightfields to model the cave with minor success. I'm currently way more inclined to use simple convex hulls.
Testing against a generic tri-mesh is considerably more involved. It's often not performance-prohibitive, but I'd take it as a last resort.

As a side note, I don't really encourage your idea of doing this yourself. While physics is cool, collision is just taken for granted and won't buy you much.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In most of the games I've worked on where artists have been modelling the environments -- from space-ship corridors to mountains, to caves -- they've just created another "LOD" of their model, which we called the physics mesh. This mesh wouldn't be used by the renderer at all, but would be fed into the physics system as a tri-mesh.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For my game (in the current state it consists only of caves) I use a terrain mesh (calculated on the fly) and a low resolution tri-mesh of the cave walls. The benefit of using this combination is, that you have really good accuracy for the ground (render mesh ~ collision mesh) and an acceptable accuracy for walls and ceilings. As long as you don't use very exact collision reprensentations of your characters which interact with the world, you don't need hi-accuracy for the environment. There will be always some tails or ears sticking in the walls.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0