Sign in to follow this  
Star_AD

License for distribute a free software

Recommended Posts

Star_AD    161
Hi!

Finally I have finished an application that I was working on. It is an application to create procedural textures.
I want to distribute this software with a public license, It can be downloaded free, but I don't want to distribute the source code.
I was thinking about using a Creative Commons license but, around the web, people advise to use another one for distribute software.
I was also thinking about using a GNU General Public License, but I dont know whether I have to distribute the source code or not.

If anyone has experience on that topic and could help me, I will be very thankful.

Thanks in advance. Edited by Star_AD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ashaman73    13715
I got the same problem a year before and I never found a free solution to it. For one CC is not tailored to programming and all other free licenses are more or less open source licenses. I've not found any free, closed source license and eventually I went to a laywer to write my own license.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ashaman73    13715
[quote name='Daaark' timestamp='1349089186' post='4985707']
Just put a copyright notice, and mark it as freeware with the standard disclaimer of liability.
[/quote]
Well.. this could be dangerous, but it depends on where you live and where you want to distribute your software. I.e. in germany you can't just make a blanket disclaimer of liability, in germany you are always reliable for certain events, therefore a blanket disclaimer could make your license (partly) effectless, when it just has one invalid clause.

Therefore ask a lawyer. Edited by Ashaman73

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Star_AD    161
Thanks for the fast answer!
I am living in Spain and I want to distribute my software around the whole world.
I will do that, I will talk with a lawyer friend of mine.
Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Star_AD' timestamp='1349088578' post='4985704']I was also thinking about using a GNU General Public License, but I dont know whether I have to distribute the source code or not.[/quote]
The whole point of the GPL is that you're [i]required[/i] to provide the source code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alh420    5995
[quote name='mholmes' timestamp='1349244759' post='4986295']
Use GNU, it just says this is your work, its free to use but you must give credit.
[/quote]

No it does not. GNU GPL puts up a lot of requirements, like for example the source distribution.
Its also "viral", basically using anything GPL in your project will force you to make your whole project GPL.

with LGPL you don't have to distribute source code, and you don't have the viral part, but its still very far from "this is my work, its free but you must give credit..."

GNU GPL is not only a software license, it also has a political agenda.

You might want to look into MIT or Apache, they are pretty liberal Edited by Olof Hedman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Star_AD    161
[quote name='Olof Hedman' timestamp='1349264117' post='4986346']
You might want to look into MIT or Apache, they are pretty liberal
[/quote]

Thanks, I am looking in this website: [url="http://opensource.org/licenses/category"]http://opensource.or...censes/category[/url]
I was looking the MIT license but this isn't that I am looking for.
I don't want the people can sell my software...
For the moment I haven't read the Apache license, this will be the next one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mdwh    1108
It's interesting that there aren't really standard licences for closed source software (AFAIK) - the closest is to pick on of the Creative Commons licenses. It's true they recommend the GPL for software, but that is for open source. I'd still say an established licence is better than writing your own.

OOI, why don't you want to release the code, if you're happy to release the program for free?

"I don't want the people can sell my software..."

In that case, no Free or Open Source licence will be useful, as by definition they allow commercial use. But would people be able to sell it, if it's available for free?

Olof Hedman: If that counts as a political agenda, by that reasoning most licences (including proprietary) have a political agenda...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alh420    5995
[quote name='mdwh' timestamp='1349275357' post='4986397']
Olof Hedman: If that counts as a political agenda, by that reasoning most licences (including proprietary) have a political agenda...
[/quote]

The origin of GNU and GPL is a strong belief that all software, as all human ideas, should be open source, and that it should be illegal to hold out on the source code to anything. (including patents, etc)
And it was designed to promote that belief. (a big reason for the "viral" part)

Nothing wrong with that, I think it's a beautiful idea, and it has a lot of merit.
But it's good to know when you choose what license to use, and its far from just "it's free".
GPL is actually pretty complicated, thats why they had to design LGPL to loosen up on the "political"part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mdwh    1108
Fair enough, it just sounded a bit negative [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img] I agree there are politics behind the GPL. Most licences are inherently "viral", including what the OP is after (if I wanted to distribute his tool in my package, I could no distribute commerciall) - you have to abide by the terms, which can apply to the whole - yes, the idea is to use the same rules of copyright, to trying to preserve freedom for users.

[quote]But it's good to know when you choose what license to use, and its far from just "it's free".[/quote]Indeed Free/Open Source licences are not public domain, and saying something is free isn't a complete description of a licence (this goes for any freeware or other material that is offered "for free", it doesn't imply that you can do what you like with it). The GPL is about preserving freedom for end users of software, which isn't the same as freedom in a licence for redistribution, that you get more in licenses like BSD. It's impossible to have both, so one has to choose [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]

I agree that mholme's description of the GPL was just plain completely wrong. Edited by mdwh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this