• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
shurcool

Software Licences...?

5 posts in this topic

I suppose if one is writing open source software, there should be some licence attached, right?

I'm not too good with the legal matters, nor do I want to spend much effort on getting better. Most of the ones I've seen have complex and lengthy documents, making it hard to understand them and choose the best one.

What I want in a licence is one that basically says two things:

[b]1. You may do anything with this project that benefits the human race as a whole.[/b]
[b]2. You may NOT do anything with this project that detracts from the human race as a whole.[/b]

I know it's not advisable to write your own licence (especially when you have no law knowledge) cuz it'll probably backfire and not do its intended purpose... But is there any licence that basically says that?

I would put my projects in public domain or the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL[/url] licence, but I think the problem with that is someone can take it, and change the licence, change the attributions, and make it closed source, then sue you for working on it.

This would be disallowed by my licence above, because it may benefit one person/company by 1000 points, but each other person on the planet losing 1 point would outweigh it. However, making the source closed source but putting in 10x times the effort that the open source community was putting into it and making the product better would be allowed. Basically, the formula for net benefit change is: sum of(benefit change each human). If it goes up, it's good. If it goes down, you can't do it. I don't know how to handle the fact it's not exact science (and the expected outcome may not occur).

P.S. If's not clear already, I don't care about getting compensated in the traditional ways from my projects... I'll accept donations and such, but I won't prevent anyone from downloading/using my tools by forcing them to pay up front. At the same time, I'd love to get help working on stuff from like-minded people (if any exist). Edited by shurcool
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"but I think the problem with that is someone can take it, and change the licence, change the attributions, and make it closed source, then sue you for working on it."

You'll have evidence of publishing the project and the source code before whoever does that, so you have the proof of ownership I supposed. Can't be sued for having something before they even claim they made it, right?

I'm just gonna drop the MIT license here. http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
Because "2. You may NOT do anything with this project that detracts from the human race as a whole." is a complicated issue, since there have to be solid standards as to what it actually means to "[b]detracts from the human race as a whole[/b]".

What I mean is, there is nothing defined regarding what is good use or badso it's complicated to state that there may not be any "bad uses".
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems like a terrible licence, how do you measure said benefit to humanity?

"but I think the problem with that is someone can take it, and change the licence, change the attributions, and make it closed source, then sue you for working on it."

There is no way that they can claim copyright on something that isn't yours. It would only be an issue if you were then to distribute their copy (even then, there's a US ruling saying you can't copyright copies of public domain material).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(Well, they can _claim_ it of course, just I mean it wouldn't be true. It's unclear what situation you're really describing here?)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Preston-Werner mentions the MIT licence in this [url="http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html"]blog post[/url] too. That's reassuring.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='shurcool' timestamp='1349115746' post='4985817']
I suppose if one is writing open source software, there should be some licence attached, right?
[/quote]
I think you mean "if one is distributing software, there should be some license attached." You are probably correct.
[quote]
I'm not too good with the legal matters, nor do I want to spend much effort on getting better. Most of the ones I've seen have complex and lengthy documents, making it hard to understand them and choose the best one.

What I want in a licence is one that basically says two things:

[b]1. You may do anything with this project that benefits the human race as a whole.[/b]
[b]2. You may NOT do anything with this project that detracts from the human race as a whole.[/b]

I know it's not advisable to write your own licence (especially when you have no law knowledge) cuz it'll probably backfire and not do its intended purpose... But is there any licence that basically says that?
[/quote]
You're going for a non-free distribution license. There are a few. The license requiring you to use the software for the benefit of the human race is likely to prevent much distribution, however. Perhaps the [url="http://www.json.org/license.html"]JSON[/url] license is what you're looking for.
[quote]
I would put my projects in public domain or the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL[/url] licence, but I think the problem with that is someone can take it, and change the licence, change the attributions, and make it closed source, then sue you for working on it.
[/quote]
Really, if you're going to get in to licensing and distribution, you need to understand some of the basics, like the concept of copyright. If someone takes your copyrighted code and claims it's theirs and tried to sue, your lawyers will get rich off their lawyers. At least in jurisdictions that have copyright.
[quote]
P.S. If's not clear already, I don't care about getting compensated in the traditional ways from my projects... I'll accept donations and such, but I won't prevent anyone from downloading/using my tools by forcing them to pay up front. At the same time, I'd love to get help working on stuff from like-minded people (if any exist).
[/quote]
While it may not be your cup of tea, there are [url="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html"]helpful discussions[/url] of [url="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html"]various software distribution licenses[/url].
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0