Sign in to follow this  

DX11 Vertexes not getting drawn

This topic is 1902 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

[source lang="cpp"]// Create vertex buffer
Vertex vertices[] =
{
//paddle 1
{ XMFLOAT3(-10.0f, -100.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::White },
{ XMFLOAT3(-10.0f, +140.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Black },
{ XMFLOAT3(+10.5f, +140.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Red },
{ XMFLOAT3(+10.5f, -100.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Green },

//paddle
{ XMFLOAT3(-10.0f, -100.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::White },
{ XMFLOAT3(-10.0f, +140.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Black },
{ XMFLOAT3(+10.5f, +140.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Red },
{ XMFLOAT3(+10.5f, -100.0f, 0.0f), (const float*)&Colors::Green }
};

D3D11_BUFFER_DESC vbd;
vbd.Usage = D3D11_USAGE_IMMUTABLE;
vbd.ByteWidth = sizeof(Vertex) * 8;
vbd.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_VERTEX_BUFFER;
vbd.CPUAccessFlags = 0;
vbd.MiscFlags = 0;
vbd.StructureByteStride = 0;
D3D11_SUBRESOURCE_DATA vinitData;
vinitData.pSysMem = vertices;
HR(md3dDevice->CreateBuffer(&vbd, &vinitData, &mBoxVB));


// Create the index buffer

UINT indices[] = {
// paddle1
0, 1, 2,
0, 2, 3,

//paddl2
4,5,6,
4,7,6


};

D3D11_BUFFER_DESC ibd;
ibd.Usage = D3D11_USAGE_IMMUTABLE;
ibd.ByteWidth = sizeof(UINT) * 12;
ibd.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_INDEX_BUFFER;
ibd.CPUAccessFlags = 0;
ibd.MiscFlags = 0;
ibd.StructureByteStride = 0;
D3D11_SUBRESOURCE_DATA iinitData;
iinitData.pSysMem = indices;
HR(md3dDevice->CreateBuffer(&ibd, &iinitData, &mBoxIB));


D3DX11_TECHNIQUE_DESC techDesc;
mTech->GetDesc( &techDesc );
for(UINT p = 0; p < techDesc.Passes; ++p)
{
XMMATRIX w = XMMatrixTranslation(510,0,0);
XMMATRIX worldViewProj = w*view*proj;
mfxWorldViewProj->SetMatrix(reinterpret_cast<float*>(&worldViewProj));
mTech->GetPassByIndex(p)->Apply(0, md3dImmediateContext);

// 36 indices for the box.
md3dImmediateContext->DrawIndexed(6, 0, 0);

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

XMMATRIX w2 = XMMatrixTranslation(0,0,0);
XMMATRIX worldViewProj2 = w2*view*proj;
mfxWorldViewProj->SetMatrix(reinterpret_cast<float*>(&worldViewProj2));
mTech->GetPassByIndex(p)->Apply(0, md3dImmediateContext);

// 36 indices for the box.
md3dImmediateContext->DrawIndexed(6, 6,4);


}[/source]


As you can see I use the DrawIndexed 2 times,the first time it works perfectly,the second time NOTHING gets drawn! Can someone tell me why? I forgot something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you mean that second time your program enters the drawing part nothing gets drawn or that the second draw command has no effect?

I hope that the code isn't the actual code from your program since you don't need to and must not create the vertex buffer every time you want something to get drawn. It's something you do once, and after you can use the same data for the rest of the program.

Also, the paddle 1 and paddle 2 geometry seems to be the same, you may want to use the same geometry for them both.

Maybe you forget to bind your vertex and index buffer before drawing?

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ofcourse I don't create a vertex buffer every time I draw a frame,that wouldn't even be possible,the app would crash before I could even see it on the screen.I just extracted the code so you can see how they're defined.

Yes the geometry for the paddles is exactly the same,but that's not the point,I just want to see how this work,how drawing two things from the same buffer is working.Is more like an exercise for me...

So md3dImmediateContext->DrawIndexed(6, 0, 0); draws the first one perfectly but the second one just doesn't get drawn!
but

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess you have tried to draw the first paddle multiple times with different transforms to verify that things works as they should?

[s]The drawing commands seems to be fine in my opinion.[/s] I guess you could show some code before the drawing calls so that the everything is set correctly for drawing.

[edit]

From MSDN:

[i]void DrawIndexed( [in] UINT IndexCount, [in] UINT StartIndexLocation, [in] INT BaseVertexLocation);
BaseVertexLocation [in] Type: INT A value added to each index before reading a vertex from the vertex buffer.[/i]

I think that your 3rd value should be 0.

[edit]

Cheers! Edited by kauna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[source lang="cpp"]md3dImmediateContext->ClearRenderTargetView(mRenderTargetView, reinterpret_cast<const float*>(&Colors::LightSteelBlue));
md3dImmediateContext->ClearDepthStencilView(mDepthStencilView, D3D11_CLEAR_DEPTH|D3D11_CLEAR_STENCIL, 1.0f, 0);

md3dImmediateContext->IASetInputLayout(mInputLayout);
md3dImmediateContext->IASetPrimitiveTopology(D3D11_PRIMITIVE_TOPOLOGY_TRIANGLELIST);

UINT stride = sizeof(Vertex);
UINT offset = 0;
md3dImmediateContext->IASetVertexBuffers(0, 1, &mBoxVB, &stride, &offset);
md3dImmediateContext->IASetIndexBuffer(mBoxIB, DXGI_FORMAT_R32_UINT, 0);

// Set constants

XMMATRIX view = XMLoadFloat4x4(&mView);
XMMATRIX proj = XMLoadFloat4x4(&mProj);[/source]

That's what happens before the code I gave you(before it actually starts the drawing process)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope,

since your indices define already that you want to draw the 4 last of them.

You can test it easily by setting different colors to the last vertices.

[edit]

BaseVertexLocation [in] Type: INT A value added to each index before reading a vertex from the vertex buffer.

If you put 4 as the BaseVertexLocation, you'll be reading outside of your vertex buffer. Consider adding 4 to values

//paddl2
4,5,6,4,7,6 -> 8,9,10,8,11,10

All of them are out of bounds.

[edit]


Cheers! Edited by kauna

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1902 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628745
    • Total Posts
      2984487
  • Similar Content

    • By GreenGodDiary
      Having some issues with a geometry shader in a very basic DX app.
      We have an assignment where we are supposed to render a rotating textured quad, and in the geometry shader duplicate this quad and offset it by its normal. Very basic stuff essentially.
      My issue is that the duplicated quad, when rendered in front of the original quad, seems to fail the Z test and thus the original quad is rendered on top of it.
      Whats even weirder is that this only happens for one of the triangles in the duplicated quad, against one of the original quads triangles.

      Here's a video to show you what happens: Video (ignore the stretched textures)

      Here's my GS: (VS is simple passthrough shader and PS is just as basic)
      struct VS_OUT { float4 Pos : SV_POSITION; float2 UV : TEXCOORD; }; struct VS_IN { float4 Pos : POSITION; float2 UV : TEXCOORD; }; cbuffer cbPerObject : register(b0) { float4x4 WVP; }; [maxvertexcount(6)] void main( triangle VS_IN input[3], inout TriangleStream< VS_OUT > output ) { //Calculate normal float4 faceEdgeA = input[1].Pos - input[0].Pos; float4 faceEdgeB = input[2].Pos - input[0].Pos; float3 faceNormal = normalize(cross(faceEdgeA.xyz, faceEdgeB.xyz)); //Input triangle, transformed for (uint i = 0; i < 3; i++) { VS_OUT element; VS_IN vert = input[i]; element.Pos = mul(vert.Pos, WVP); element.UV = vert.UV; output.Append(element); } output.RestartStrip(); for (uint j = 0; j < 3; j++) { VS_OUT element; VS_IN vert = input[j]; element.Pos = mul(vert.Pos + float4(faceNormal, 0.0f), WVP); element.Pos.xyz; element.UV = vert.UV; output.Append(element); } }  
      I havent used geometry shaders much so im not 100% on what happens behind the scenes.
      Any tips appreciated! 
    • By mister345
      Hi, I'm building a game engine using DirectX11 in c++.
      I need a basic physics engine to handle collisions and motion, and no time to write my own.
      What is the easiest solution for this? Bullet and PhysX both seem too complicated and would still require writing my own wrapper classes, it seems. 
      I found this thing called PAL - physics abstraction layer that can support bullet, physx, etc, but it's so old and no info on how to download or install it.
      The simpler the better. Please let me know, thanks!
    • By Hexaa
      I try to draw lines with different thicknesses using the geometry shader approach from here:
      https://forum.libcinder.org/topic/smooth-thick-lines-using-geometry-shader
      It seems to work great on my development machine (some Intel HD). However, if I try it on my target (Nvidia NVS 300, yes it's old) I get different results. See the attached images. There
      seem to be gaps in my sine signal that the NVS 300 device creates, the intel does what I want and expect in the other picture.
      It's a shame, because I just can't figure out why. I expect it to be the same. I get no Error in the debug output, with enabled native debugging. I disabled culling with CullMode.None. Could it be some z-fighting? I have little clue about it but I tested to play around with the RasterizerStateDescription and DepthBias properties with no success, no change at all. Maybe I miss something there?
      I develop the application with SharpDX btw.
      Any clues or help is very welcome
       


    • By Beny Benz
      Hi,
      I'm currently trying to write a shader which shoud compute a fast fourier transform of some data, manipulating the transformed data, do an inverse FFT an then displaying the result as vertex offset and color. I use Unity3d and HLSL as shader language. One of the main problems is that the data should not be passed from CPU to GPU for every frame if possible. My original plan was to use a vertex shader and do the fft there, but I fail to find out how to store changing data betwen shader calls/passes. I found a technique called ping-ponging which seems to be based on writing and exchangeing render targets, but I couldn't find an example for HLSL as a vertex shader yet.
      I found https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c79a3701-d028-41d9-ad74-a2b3b3958383/how-to-render-to-multiple-render-targets-in-hlsl?forum=xnaframework
      which seem to use COLOR0 and COLOR1 as such render targets.
      Is it even possible to do such calculations on the gpu only? (/in this shader stage?, because I need the result of the calculation to modify the vertex offsets there)
      I also saw the use of compute shaders in simmilar projects (ocean wave simulation), do they realy copy data between CPU / GPU for every frame?
      How does this ping-ponging / rendertarget switching technique work in HLSL?
      Have you seen an example of usage?
      Any answer would be helpfull.
      Thank you
      appswert
    • By ADDMX
      Hi
      Just a simple question about compute shaders (CS5, DX11).
      Do the atomic operations (InterlockedAdd in my case) should work without any issues on RWByteAddressBuffer and be globaly coherent ?
      I'v come back from CUDA world and commited fairly simple kernel that does some job, the pseudo-code is as follows:
      (both kernels use that same RWByteAddressBuffer)
      first kernel does some job and sets Result[0] = 0;
      (using Result.Store(0, 0))
      I'v checked with debugger, and indeed the value stored at dword 0 is 0
      now my second kernel
      RWByteAddressBuffer Result;  [numthreads(8, 8, 8)] void main() {     for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)     {         uint4 v0 = DoSomeCalculations1();         uint4 v1 = DoSomeCalculations2();         uint4 v2 = DoSomeCalculations3();                  if (v0.w == 0 && v1.w == 0 && v2.w)             continue;         //    increment counter by 3, and get it previous value         // this should basically allocate space for 3 uint4 values in buffer         uint prev;         Result.InterlockedAdd(0, 3, prev);                  // this fills the buffer with 3 uint4 values (+1 is here as the first 16 bytes is occupied by DrawInstancedIndirect data)         Result.Store4((prev+0+1)*16, v0);         Result.Store4((prev+1+1)*16, v1);         Result.Store4((prev+2+1)*16, v2);     } } Now I invoke it with Dispatch(4,4,4)
      Now I use DrawInstancedIndirect to draw the buffer, but ocassionaly there is missed triangle here and there for a frame, as if the atomic counter does not work as expected
      do I need any additional synchronization there ?
      I'v tried 'AllMemoryBarrierWithGroupSync' at the end of kernel, but without effect.
      If I do not use atomic counter, and istead just output empty vertices (that will transform into degenerated triangles) the all is OK - as if I'm missing some form of synchronization, but I do not see such a thing in DX11.
      I'v tested on both old and new nvidia hardware (680M and 1080, the behaviour is that same).
       
  • Popular Now