• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
EddieV223

What free c++ IDE has the best syntax highlighting? ( not including VS2012 )

14 posts in this topic

I'm looking for a replacement to VS2012 for a cross platform project. I need the best syntax highlighting cause VS2012 has spoiled me rotten and I'm used to it. I will use GNU compilers such as mingGW on windows.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I used to use [url="http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html"]DevC++[/url]. No idea if it's current usability stacks up to what you're used to though. Edited by Haps
-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I second QtCreator - I couldn't tell you if it has the "best" syntax highlighting, but it has at least good syntax highlighting and good auto-completion.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='samoth' timestamp='1349636638' post='4987743']
Other IDEs such as Eclipse or KDevelop beat the crap out of Code::Blocks and wipe the floor with it...
[/quote]
Thank you for [i]that[/i] imagery, although why you think wiping the floor with crap is a good idea may need further clarification.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I vote for Qt Creator. It's open source and cross platform (win, linux, mac).

The syntax highlighting is very decent. For example highlighting of a symbol under cursor highlights it correctly inside its scope, not just the same word in the whole editor. Code completion just works (unlike Visual Studio's Intellisense).

I like also small refactoring features, like changing declaration of a method in a header file will automatically sync the change to the implementation in the .cpp file. The code editor has also features like follow symbol (Ctrl+click), find usages, switch between definition and declaration, etc. These things in Qt Creator just work, while in other IDEs I've tried, only work sometimes.

Although the IDE is not as customizable as Visual Studio or Eclipse (forget dockable panels), it's organized quite ergonomically and it's very fast (unlike eg. Eclipse).

You can download the SDK installer here: http://qt-project.org/downloads

It's worth to mention, that the Qt Creator IDE was designed to work with the Qt libraries, which itself is a great cross platform application toolkit for writing any kind of app imaginable. It literally runs everywhere, eg. besides desktop platforms also ARM and embedded platforms, Android, soon iOS. You can of course use Qt Creator and not use the Qt libraries if you don't need them. However if you are into C++ and cross-platform development, I strongly recommend looking into Qt itself.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have been using VC for many years (very nice, the only real drawback is non cross platform), then I tried DevC++ (I DO NOT recommend it, as many people above mentioned it already). Then went for Code::Blocks, which is quite OK, except for code completion (I don't know if I set it up the wrong way or something, but it is soo bad I think I will just disable it soon).

As long time VC++ user I say the switch to Code::Blocks is not agonizing at all. Yes, it feels (and is) inferior, but... not really that much (depends on your habits and what you need, I have heard debugger is much poorer, althrough I don't use it so I dunno). Anyway, it was much nicer than Eclipse (which I abandoned quickly, was not to my taste and too slow).

Still, I would also try Qt-something, it might be worth checking first.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most IDE's now days have good syntax highlighting. Also it is hard to say what u mean by "best".
Do you mean allot of colors or most pretty color scheme which is configurable with most IDE's as well.
If you where looking for a list of cross platform IDE's a search true this forum would have given all your answers. Edited by DARSC0D3
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Code::Block's code completion has gotten in my way far too often, most of the time it either doesn't come up when I need it, or it pops up when I'm just renaming something and have to hit escape. Syntax highlighting is nice though, if you use the userfile hack to get more than two keyword sets.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there are no perfect IDE in this world. QtCreator, Eclipse and VS are good ones though. But they are all bad text editors. The best editors by far are vi and emacs. and they are so far away in front of the others that nobody actually understand how ´far´ that is until they´ve learned one or the other for at least one year with the help of somebody.
The only issue is that vi or emacs are barely IDEs, you can integrate build and debugging into emacs buffers, even visualize step by step and breakpoints, and local variables like VS, but it is difficult to setup and gdb is not as flexible as MS debugger.

As for highligting and completion, vi has nice plugins that are fast and works ok. emacs no, emacs is purely syntaxic, plugins to add semantic are horribles I hear.
and yet, emacs is still much better at auto indenting than VS is. But definitely not as good as Eclipse.
The best I have seen so far is Eclipse with java. With C++ it is very good as well, but less, because C++ is un-parsable.
the next best thing : VS with VisualAssistX.
I hear QtCreator is at least as good as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't like Visual Studio 2012 at all.

Personally I use Visual Studio 2010 with the Visual Assist addon. This let's you configure the syntax highlighting and also improves the intellisense a great deal
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='EddieV223' timestamp='1349580759' post='4987576']
I'm looking for a replacement to VS2012 for a cross platform project.
[/quote]

Sorry. I missed this part.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0