template<class ContainerType>
void MyFunc(ContainerType &container, ContainerType::value_type fallback = ContainerType::value_type())It will be passed something like an std::vector<> of unknown element-type.
I want it to take as the second parameter a variable of type 'element type of the container'.
I want the second parameter to default to "default initialized version of said type".
Isn't 'value_type' a standardized C++ container typedef? It's definitely present in the compiler I'm using (MinGW 4.6).
For example, if passing in a std::vector<int> into the function, it should be: std::vector<int>::value_type fallback = std::vector<int>::value_type(), which should be int fallback = int().
However, even before using the template, I get a compile error in any source files that #include the header with the templated function in it.
MinGW errors:
error: 'ContainerType::value_type' is not a type
(This is for: ContainerType::value_type fallback)
error: expected initializer before ')' token
(This is for: = ContainerType::value_type())
Why isn't ContainerType::value_type a type? std::vector<int>::value_type exists in the vector header.
I also tried this:
template<class ContainerType, class ElementType = ContainerType::value_type>
void MyFunc(ContainerType &container, ElementType fallback)And got these errors:
error: expected type-specifier
error: expected '>'
Where is my thinking going awry?
