• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IgnatusZul

ElapsedTime Movement?

4 posts in this topic

Many years of programming and I never actually used a proper elapsed time functionality, which promises to run and move game objects in pixels per second rather than pixels per frames.

My question is where do you actually add elapsed time to? Is it every single object that you move? [i](which sounds like something you will eventually miss)[/i] or is it only on the main loop?

My example...?

[Engine] -> Game([b]delta[/b]) -> Player([b]delta[/b]) -> moveRight([b]delta[/b]) - > x += speed*[b]delta[/b];
[Engine] -> Game([b]delta[/b]) -> Enemy([b]delta[/b]) -> jump([b]delta[/b]) - > y -= jumpValue*[b]delta[/b];
[Engine] -> Game([b]delta[/b]) -> BackgroundManager([b]delta[/b]) -> moveBackgrounds([b]delta[/b]) - > for each(bg in bgList) bg.x -= speed*[b]delta[/b];

Am I thinking correctly or..?
Any interesting tutorials someone can link me to?
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Working with time instead of frames will give you a more synchronized game. it's also a must when you plan to go online.
Why? Assume you have 50 processes running on your computer and your enemy has 25. Your enemies game-cycle will be called twice as fast. So he will have the advantage.

You add the time to any calculation for movement, shooting, camera, etc.
[CODE]
m_Velocity = m_Velocity * deltaTime;
m_Position = m_Velocity; // you don't need to put a delta time here because it's using the velocity who has a delta time calculated in it.

// This is the camera you want to move:
m_Camera.moveLeft( int delta );
// Inside the method of the camera:
m_CameraPosition.x = m_CameraPosition * deltaTime;
// This means you need a method for the camera: void Tick( int deltaTime ) and store the deltaTime !!
[/CODE]

[b]Edit[/b]:
If you are not sure to put a delta time with a line of code you need to think on an online game.
Will the code without deltaTime have a possibility to lose synchronization? If yes, add the deltaTime.

I hope this was helpful.


~EngineProgrammer Edited by EngineProgrammer
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just do the same thing you normally do, however this time multiply the velocity by the elapsed time.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just schedule an event to go off every 80 milliseconds, and when it does, update the game logic. Whether or not that event is next in the event queue, I check for input and render the screen. Of course this is not the approach I'd use for an online twitch-based game, but I don't plan on ever writing one.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you're handling all the entity updates in batch, you only need one delta for all of them. Create your delta and pass it through your updates. Depending on how you go about calculating your delta it can be a subtly costly operation that has little gain. It also mean all objects are synced to the same 'point' in time.

I do all these things in floatational numbers. So time becomes normalized to a second.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0