• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Paarth

How epic is super mario 64?

14 posts in this topic

Many have considered it the best but I really want to know what really made the game the best? How was nintendo able to do it? I've played it and I really love it but I don't know why I love it so much...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EDIT]
Oh, Super Mario 64. Not Mario Kart 64. Took me 2 days to realize that.
[/EDIT]


L. Spiro Edited by L. Spiro
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because, at the time:
[list]
[*]Fully immersive in its 3D environment.
[*]Easy to learn control schemes.
[*]Plenty of entertaining glitches, just like Pokemon.
[*]Rules are pretty simple (Just 1 rule)
[*]Instant loading.
[*]Unlimited tries.
[/list]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What about the camera? Many believe that the camera played the important part in the game? How is that? And how did they do such a thing???
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How is viewing up close that annoying? It first of all allows the player to see things clearly than seeing it in third person view. You can even adjust the camera in that game so what is wrong with the game's camera? isn't it revolutionary? Edited by Cap'n VG
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you want the entire Mario's body blocking the center portion of your field of view? Have you ever pressed C ^ and try to view the scenery? You can look both sides of Mario's body (left or right part of the screen), but never what's in front of Mario. The head's in the way. Edited by tom_mai78101
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why are you complaining about the center? if at all you can't see the center, you could always jump or crouch to see it.

I still don't understand why you guys feel the camera system is frustrating? Wasn't the camera responsible to explain the reason why the game was made?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, it's not just the camera itself. Here's a few links:

[url="http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/bar-none-super-mario-64-is-the-best-game-ever-made.250041429/#post-250644682"]Here's another player's opinion on the game.[/url]
[url="http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2011/11/miyamoto_super_mario_64_was_boring"]It's mentioned as "boring".[/url]
[url="http://www.roboawesome.com/?p=10128"]A better article about the camera itself.[/url]

Not to break your hopes, but the game is an industry changer. The game is fun for us to play, but to be honest, the game isn't that spectacular [size=5][u][i][b]nowadays[/b][/i][/u][/size]. The basic principles are there still, so you can continue to dig around on Google about Super Mario 64 and such and be amazed by the many things I have listed in post 3. Edited by tom_mai78101
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guess you got a point. But still wouldn't it be great if games like this could give exploring experiences?

I really love the game's exploring path. The fact that more stars can be found in that same place. Simply amazing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At the time, on the PC, it was most common to use nearest neighbour filtering on textures because the fancy 3D accelerators were still pretty damn expensive, and so the hardware accelerated bilinear filtering on the N64 was pretty awesome. It was a year or two ahead of its time in terms of the average consumer-level experience, for sure.

This is what I had in my PC when the N64 came out:
[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrox_Mystique"]http://en.wikipedia....Matrox_Mystique[/url]

The N64 blew it away.

As for the game itself: It's all about the chain chomps. Edited by taby
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me, the game was revolutionary because of how different it was from what came before it. At the time, I only barely knew what a PlayStation was; I was going straight from SNES to N64. When the N64 promo video came in from Nintendo Power magazine, I had to call my parents over to show them this incredible new world that Mario 64 offered; I couldn't believe what I was seeing. The fact that you could just run around like a crazy person in an "open world," combined with these new "realistic graphics," blew my little kid mind away.

Nowadays the game can't really hold my attention for more than an hour (same with the newer 3D Mario games, actually), but it was a completely new and unique experience for me Back in the Day. That's what made it "epic"--it was so different, and huge, and special. A real technological and cultural advancement for videogames. Fifteen years later, everything that makes Mario 64 special is essentially a standard in third-person platformers and other action games, so it's not likely to impress anyone who's playing it for the first time now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Super Mario 64 has thus far been unmatched by later 3D mario games, at least in my opinion.

Some of it's major strengths:

[b]Level design:[/b]
[indent=1]Really immersive environments (atmosphere-wise), that were really well designed (gameplay-wise). The levels were free-roaming, not linear. They had someof nooks and crannies with secrets, but not so much that finding a secret was commonplace. Each level had 6 stars to collect, and the level would reset whenever you'd enter it for the next star, and would be altered slightly with different objectives and be really replayable without feeling repetitive. You could go to levels in the order you want, dictated only by how many stars you've already collected. Each time you enter a level, you could choose which star you wanted to go after after you've accomplished the first star.[/indent]

[b]Music:[/b]
[indent=1]The music was masterfully done. It'd very much transport you into whatever environment you were in, definitely projecting different emotions and feelings: sadness in the caves, excitement and urgency when requiring speed. The best example of the music is Dire, Dire, Docks. Hazy Maze Cave is another great example, but Hazy Maze Cave's music must really be heard from inside the area and not in isolation, otherwise it just doesn't sound great on it's own, but sounds perfect when inside the cave.[/indent]

[quote name='Cap'n VG' timestamp='1350757430' post='4992219']
What about the camera? Many believe that the camera played the important part in the game? How is that? And how did they do such a thing???
[/quote]

[b]Movement and Camera:[/b]
[indent=1]One of the most important things that bring Mario 64 closer to perfection is how much they refined and polished the movement and camera control. Knowing that it was the most important part of the game, they spent months and months at the very start of development, just working on the movement. They had a flat plane, the rabbit (MIPs), and a wall for Mario to interact with. This is from memory ([size=2]though I mistakenly called the rabbit 'FLOPS'[/size]), but [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_64#Development"]Wikipedia[/url] says similar.[/indent]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to reemphasize it:

1) Immersive non-linear levels
2) 7 different missions on each level. You can replay them several times without begin boring.
It also provided a good coop experience between myself and my brothers. Each one would try a different hidden star (and the 100 coin star) and play the same level without fighting over who plays what.
3) Great movement and camera. Remembering that many stars could only be achieved by using the camera correctly.
I remember the days we spent trying to find the sixth star on the snow level. And it was only possible when we changed the camera view on the cliff.
4) Innovative Mario-like mechanics. They implemented different mechanics for the power-ups. You could wear different hats and do different stuff. That was mind-blowing for me.

For me the biggest downside was the boss fight. Fighting Bowser involved damaging the analog stick.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I never cared much for SM64 back in the day as I was playing Tomb Raider on the Playstation instead.

Saying that, it was a game that show cased the capabilities of the N64 and that machine itself was well designed toward its goal - a 3D powerhouse. For that console, SM64 was at least the "killer app".

As for Mario games...cannot stand them. The controls are annoying enough in 2D, let alone trying to jump platforms in 3D which is 10 times harder to control!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0