• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
codeman_nz

Goals or no goals?

23 posts in this topic

Hi everyone,

What do you think is better, a game where you can do whatever you want like Simcity, Civilization or the Sims or games where you have set goals and levels to complete?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on what sort of game I feel like playing (the result of my mood).
or
It depends on if either type of game happen to catch my attention (the result of the game's marketing on me).

If you're looking for an answer to help you decide what sort of game to make, my suggestion is that you go for whichever you happen to have a greater interest in developing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it completely depends on personal preferences.

I prefer single player "games" (interactive software) to have goals simply because I am not inclined to invest a whole lot of time in them. For me, Multiplayer games are another matter, where there's not really a true endgame, and I keep playing because of the gameplay and social aspects.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I find the core to games like Sim City and Minecraft is the player will establish their own goals ... build a thriving working city in Sim City ... or build a not so thriving city in Minecraft a block at a time. I think rather than goals there perhaps needs to be progression ... either you progress through the story, mission objectives or you progress on your own personal project. Edited by All Names Taken
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I generally prefer goals. Games like The Sims seem great in concept, but I always end up quitting them before I have seen all the content because I don't get any feedback or recognition on my self-chosen goals, or I discover I have self-chosen a goal which is actually impossible within the program, and I just don't have ant reason to care about exploring the remaining content, nor any efficient path to see what I haven't seen yet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There no "this is better than that" and there will never be. It depends on the whole set. As Suspense said you need an objective to be a game, it can be imposed by the system o created by yourself. To keep people playing you need at least one goal, or allow the player to set their own.

In my opinion, providing a progression system is also a goal. Unlock items, be better, more efficient...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='sunandshadow' timestamp='1351040437' post='4993297']
I generally prefer goals. Games like The Sims seem great in concept, but I always end up quitting them before I have seen all the content because I don't get any feedback or recognition on my self-chosen goals, or I discover I have self-chosen a goal which is actually impossible within the program, and I just don't have ant reason to care about exploring the remaining content, nor any efficient path to see what I haven't seen yet.
[/quote]
I've been thinking a lot lately about this idea of consuming content and what it means to game developers. Is a game not "finished" until the player has consumed all its content? Is a game "finished" as soon as the player [i]has[/i] consumed it all? To what degree does content consumption equate to finishing? Is it when the player completes the game's primary goal?

I'll use my own experience as an example of what these questions mean. I played WoW during its closed beta and continued to play for a few years after its release. I took a break for a couple years, then I eventually came back and played through the first expansion. But then an interesting thing happened. I felt done. I had completed the game, consumed all its content. I knew there was still fun to be had and progress to be made through PvP, battlegrounds, raids, etc. But I had no drive to do those things. I had completed my goal for the game, which I only then realized I had set for myself: to see the Warcraft world and explore it. When I recognized that goal and that I had achieved it, I left the game and never went back. Since then, no MMO has been able to hold my attention for more than a few months.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most of the best selling PC and console games have clear primary objectives and reward the gamer for continued play.



Clinton
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='3Ddreamer' timestamp='1351123475' post='4993596']
Most of the best selling PC and console games have clear primary objectives and reward the gamer for continued play.



Clinton
[/quote]

Got any data to back such a claim? The sims and the sims 2 are the two top selling PC games of all times, with the sims 3 and minecraft also being in the top 10 and simcity 3000 just outside of the top 10(according to wikipedia). These are all games with no clearly defined goals, but they do seem to sell on a massive scale, so be careful with statements like the one you made in your post.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are many years of gaming history. Sorry for the typo because this is what I meant to convey:


Most of the best selling PC and console games have had clear primary objectives and reward the gamer for continued play.

I am not talking necessarily about the current leaders. I apologize for the misunderstanding.


Clinton Edited by 3Ddreamer
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Radikalizm' timestamp='1351126974' post='4993615']
[quote name='3Ddreamer' timestamp='1351123475' post='4993596']
Most of the best selling PC and console games have clear primary objectives and reward the gamer for continued play.



Clinton
[/quote]

Got any data to back such a claim? The sims and the sims 2 are the two top selling PC games of all times, with the sims 3 and minecraft also being in the top 10 and simcity 3000 just outside of the top 10(according to wikipedia). These are all games with no clearly defined goals, but they do seem to sell on a massive scale, so be careful with statements like the one you made in your post.
[/quote]

No data is necessary because it is only a miscommunication.

I look at gross sales in dollar amount as being more important than numbers of copies sold. My view is also that the history of top games over the decades is more important than the last year or two in a sense of the permanent desirables.

Some games have had hundreds of millions or more than a billion dollars in gross sales in recent years, so there is more than one way to measure sales.

People are obviously willing to pay more money per game if there are objectives and rewards, speaking in a general sense, though we all know there are exceptions and exceptional games.


Clinton
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Games without goals are usually harder to make fun, than games with clear goals. Simply because your game has to offer a lot of stuff to do, so the goals are emergent. A simple game like tetris can't be fun without predefined goals.

I would recommend staying away from sandboxes unless you have clear understanding of what you are doing.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Suspense' timestamp='1351030172' post='4993233']First, some background for my comments: some people use the presence or absence of goals to define something as a game or a toy: games are activities with goals to be achieved, while toys are simply objects to be played with. By that definition, SimCity, Minecraft, and the like are toys, not games. A ball is a toy to be played with; basketball is a game to be won.[/quote]

God games are toys with goals appended. It's like finding a ball with instructions on how to have fun with it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Suspense' timestamp='1351110006' post='4993539']
[quote name='sunandshadow' timestamp='1351040437' post='4993297']
I generally prefer goals. Games like The Sims seem great in concept, but I always end up quitting them before I have seen all the content because I don't get any feedback or recognition on my self-chosen goals, or I discover I have self-chosen a goal which is actually impossible within the program, and I just don't have ant reason to care about exploring the remaining content, nor any efficient path to see what I haven't seen yet.
[/quote]
I've been thinking a lot lately about this idea of consuming content and what it means to game developers. Is a game not "finished" until the player has consumed all its content? Is a game "finished" as soon as the player [i]has[/i] consumed it all? To what degree does content consumption equate to finishing? Is it when the player completes the game's primary goal?

I'll use my own experience as an example of what these questions mean. I played WoW during its closed beta and continued to play for a few years after its release. I took a break for a couple years, then I eventually came back and played through the first expansion. But then an interesting thing happened. I felt done. I had completed the game, consumed all its content. I knew there was still fun to be had and progress to be made through PvP, battlegrounds, raids, etc. But I had no drive to do those things. I had completed my goal for the game, which I only then realized I had set for myself: to see the Warcraft world and explore it. When I recognized that goal and that I had achieved it, I left the game and never went back. Since then, no MMO has been able to hold my attention for more than a few months.
[/quote]
Well, there are different ways to define finished. Is it when the player stops playing, even if they don't feel satisfied? Is it when the player feels satisfied, even if they keep playing? Is a game necessarily one big piece of entertainment, or might some games more usefully be compared to a series of novels or something like the Marvel or DC comicverse which maintains several parallel comic series? Possibly the player could "finish" something several times over the course of playing a game, but then start something new or have already started something new. Some players don't care about experiencing all the content, or care about some kinds of content and not others. Some games make it impossible for the player to experience all the content in a single play-through. Some games have a set amount of official content but encourage players to create additional content and assist the players in distributing this content to each other. Different players may have a different idea of what the game's main goal is too: can't tell you how many breeding sim/monster capturing type games I've started with the goal of collecting one of every creature, only to find that the game doesn't allow this or acknowledge that players might want to do it. And I think I've twice stopped playing an MMO after getting an awesome mount because that became my main goal, and once I had achieved it I didn't find something new to pursue. Edited by sunandshadow
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='sunandshadow' timestamp='1351197850' post='4993917']
Different player's may have a different idea of what the game's main goal is too: can't tell you how many breeding sim/monster capturing type games I've started with the goal of collecting one of every creature, only to find that the game doesn't allow this or acknowledge that players might want to do it.
[/quote]
Interesting. It sounds like the game mechanics suggested a goal implicitly, but then it turns out the goal wasn't actually achievable? Like not being able to catch all the Pokemon without trading? Or is it more like not providing enough storage space for all them?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Suspense' timestamp='1351265177' post='4994169']
[quote name='sunandshadow' timestamp='1351197850' post='4993917']
Different player's may have a different idea of what the game's main goal is too: can't tell you how many breeding sim/monster capturing type games I've started with the goal of collecting one of every creature, only to find that the game doesn't allow this or acknowledge that players might want to do it.
[/quote]
Interesting. It sounds like the game mechanics suggested a goal implicitly, but then it turns out the goal wasn't actually achievable? Like not being able to catch all the Pokemon without trading? Or is it more like not providing enough storage space for all them?
[/quote]
Usually it's a lack of storage space, since trading pokemon is sort of within the game - no one would bat an eye at that if it were in an online game where it's easier to find a trading partner, it's just a PITA in a mostly singleplayer offline game. But even if there's enough storage space, the game doesn't acknowledge the player's collecting efforts with achievements or quests and rewards, or even NPC dialogue.

I'm not sure whether the game mechanics implicitly suggest collecting, or if it's more true to say that many humans have a natural urge to collect, especially things that have one base type with lots of variations. Certainly everyone who works to build a collection wants to have it be praised by others, whether those others are NPCs or other players.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I enjoy both kinds of games, but I consistently spend more time with games that let me ignore their goals for my own, or which provide many other goals over and on top of "The Story."

Skyrim is a pretty good example. I've played the game with a few different characters, and one of them has reached very high levels without progressing very far in the main storyline. At no point did I feel like the world was stunted because of this. I can have a full and fun game experience without the main quest.

Dwarf Fortress is perhaps the ultimate in "Set your own goals" and I have correspondingly poured hours of my life into it designing and building megaprojects, modding, and challenging myself to survive different scenarios.

I think that the ability to set one's own goals makes the game more apt as a story [i]generator[/i], letting the player create a story through playing, rather than just a story teller passing on the writing of somebody else.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is easy for market forces to cause a demand for video toys instead of video games -not meant to offend anybody. There is still a little boy in me, too, and I like to take a break from more mature game challenges to let the little boy in me loose once in a while.

Am I adult enough to enjoy the highly goal oriented games yet adult enough to let the little boy in me just be spontaneous?


Clinton
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's also take a look at Skyrim. The game has it core game goal, finish the game. The game also features many other goals, depending on what the players want to do. (to reach max level as well, to get that new armors, to look awesome, to become very powerful, to explore the whole game, to buy a house and marry an NPC wife, to kill every villager, or to keep playing it with new mods and so on.)

So with Mass Effect, you can beat the game, but you can also have other goals to accomplish as well.

Almost the same with MMOs, core game goal is to finish the game's content (hopefully the developers will keep updating and releasing more contents), apart from that, the game is open and let players make their own goals.

IMO, this is the best and keeps players the longest.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All games have goals, but there's a difference between player created goals or in-game objectives.

In Simcity or Minecraft you can set ur own goals, and so u give the game a lot of replayability.

While an MMO like World of Warcraft has a strict level system to advance on, helping the player along into the game, but still u can see the game overall, or certain aspects of the game as part of the players goal outside of the game. (Achieving 2.2k Arena rating, Killing all the Raid bosses)

While achievements are a good example of incentivising player goals with in game objectives.

-Exo
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm kind of thinking about making a distinction between modding and goals.

What do you guys think?


Clinton
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do something everyone will like- Both! You can always make it free roam and still have missions to do. What really frustrates me is that sometimes you are very limited to what you can do until you complete the missions. What I like in games are where all of the locations are unlocked at the beginning. EXCEPTION: Saints Row 2.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What do Assassin's Creed, Grand Theft Auto, Dishonored, Star Control II, Zelda and others have in common? They have [i][b]both![/b][/i] Worlds to explore and missions to do. Missions are rewarded with progress. Exploration is rewarded with options.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0