Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL How to test if OpenGL support textures of non power of 2?

This topic is 1892 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I need a code (that works under OpenGL 1.5+) that checks if textures of non power of 2 are supported (via some extension maybe?)

Or maybe I should just check if OpenGL 2.0 is present and older versions would never be able to support it anyway?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check the extension string for ARB_texture_non_power_of_two. For OpenGL 2.0 and later you don't have to check anything since its in the core already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do I need to test for extension AND for OpenGL version 2.0+

OR

OpenGL 2.0+ has ARB_texture_non_power_of_two extension always present? So the check for extension presence alone is enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OpenGL 2.0 or later alone is enough, you don't need to check the extension if the version is OK. If the version is pre-2.0, then you need to check the extension. But note that 2.0 does not mean that the extension will be listed so you cannot rely on the extension alone. You have to check both if you want to cover for earlier versions, but passing one of the tests is enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beware that OpenGL makes no promise to hardware-accelerate non-power-of-two textures. And you can't check for that.

In general if your GL_VERSION is 3.0 or better you're absolutely guaranteed to have them, and to have them be hardware accelerated. In the rare event that you encounter a really really really old card with a lower version, you may or may not have them be accelerated (GeForce FX was an offender here, despite claiming 2.0). You might be aware to get away with GL_ARB_texture_rectangle instead, if your usage meets it's restrictions: http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ARB/texture_rectangle.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, maybe I will explain in details.

I use glDrawPixels for 2D stuff, that are my requirements. Because it's slow I rewrote it to standard textured quads (ortho perspective, etc). But since power of two textures are sometimes not supported I need to fallback to glDrawPixels in some cases (that's why I need the detection part). I can do it any other way of course, as long as compatibility and performance is OK since this is my goal. Again, I don't need anything fancy here, it's just a replacement for glDrawPixels.

Is the GL_ARB_texture_rectangle extension significantly more supported? Or other extensions/tricks?

How to do it best? How you would do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just because you're using textures doesn't mean you have to draw the whole texture. Another option is to use a texture the size of the next larger power of two and then stick your image in a part of the larger texture. You can even pack multiple images in in the same texture if you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Acharis' timestamp='1351063621' post='4993347']OK, maybe I will explain in details.

I use glDrawPixels for 2D stuff, that are my requirements. Because it's slow I rewrote it to standard textured quads (ortho perspective, etc). But since power of two textures are sometimes not supported I need to fallback to glDrawPixels in some cases (that's why I need the detection part). I can do it any other way of course, as long as compatibility and performance is OK since this is my goal. Again, I don't need anything fancy here, it's just a replacement for glDrawPixels.[/quote]

glDrawPixels can be fast if you use the right params. Since you've observed slowness I'm guessing that you're using dear old GL_RGB/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, which is a slow path nearly everywhere; you need these parameters to match the native format of your backbuffer otherwise GL is going to send the data through intermediate conversion steps, so try it with GL_BGRA/GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV for starters and you should see a [i]very[/i] noticeable performance increase (at the cost of an extra byte per pixel - fair tradeoff) - that just requires GL1.2 support. Also be sure, if you're using glDrawPixels, to switch off texturing and lighting, as OpenGL will texture and light individual pixels otherwise.

[quote name='Acharis' timestamp='1351063621' post='4993347']Is the GL_ARB_texture_rectangle extension significantly more supported? Or other extensions/tricks?[/quote]

The definition of "significant" nowadays is that you can rely on full general non-power-of-two support being available absolutely everywhere, aside from some 6-year-old laptops or business-class PCs with integrated Intels. But since you're aiming for an [i]extremely [/i]downlevel minimum GL_VERSION it's fair to say that GL_ARB_texture_rectangle is more likely to be supported on that class of lower paleolithic hardware. Edited by mhagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1351076224' post='4993388']
glDrawPixels can be fast if you use the right params. Since you've observed slowness I'm guessing that you're using dear old GL_RGB/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, which is a slow path nearly everywhere; you need these parameters to match the native format of your backbuffer otherwise GL is going to send the data through intermediate conversion steps, so try it with GL_BGRA/GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV for starters and you should see a [i]very[/i] noticeable performance increase (at the cost of an extra byte per pixel - fair tradeoff) - that just requires GL1.2 support. [/quote]Can I use GL_RGBA,GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV instead? Or it must be BGRA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Acharis' timestamp='1352719918' post='5000195']
[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1351076224' post='4993388']
glDrawPixels can be fast if you use the right params. Since you've observed slowness I'm guessing that you're using dear old GL_RGB/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, which is a slow path nearly everywhere; you need these parameters to match the native format of your backbuffer otherwise GL is going to send the data through intermediate conversion steps, so try it with GL_BGRA/GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV for starters and you should see a [i]very[/i] noticeable performance increase (at the cost of an extra byte per pixel - fair tradeoff) - that just requires GL1.2 support. [/quote]Can I use GL_RGBA,GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV instead? Or it must be BGRA?
[/quote]

It depends on the layout of your underlying framebuffer, and that's going to be decided by your hardware. If your hardware likes data in BGRA order, then BGRA order is what you must use to get the fast path.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

  • Popular Now