• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ic0de

OpenGL
How to make sure your game works on multiple graphics cards

6 posts in this topic

I have my OpenGL game which runs excellent on Nvidia cards, has minor issues with ATI cards and fails hard on Intel cards, all of these cards support the correct OpenGLversion and all required extensions. I managed to test these things on friends computers but I only have an Nvidia card and to fix these issues I need access to the card for extended periods of time. I'm not going to buy another card so I was wondering if software existed to emulate the glitches and idiosyncrasies of certain cards so I can work around them? A list of known issues with ATI and Intel drivers would also go along way to make my game more compatible.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nvidia tries to be developer-friendly... even if you do the wrong thing, the driver will try to fix it for you and give correct output. The real glitch you're dealing with may be that Nvidia doesn't fail where it "should".

I don't know of any system that lets you emulate an ATI card with an Nvidia card, but there are different hacks and cheats in place for different retail games. Try running your game with the app profile of some AAA titles (BattleField 3, etc). Some games might be profiled to minimize the use of driver "training wheels"... you could use that fact to reproduce your bug on Nvidia hardware, and figure out what you're doing wrong in code.

If all else fails, buy your friend some pizza and monopolize his system all day while he plays Xbox. That's what friends are for.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To really be sure, you're going to need a few different cards. Which GL version are you using? GL2.1 capable cards (from any maker) can be picked up for ~$10 on eBay these days.

Failing that, most compatability bugs are from invalid code -- as mentioned above, different vendors will tolerate different types of invalid code. e.g. nVidia accepts HLSL code in their GLSL shaders, and ATI accepts deprecated API usage that the standard says should produce errors, etc, etc...

You could get some tools to help with validation, e.g. use ATI ShaderAnalyzer to see if it spots any errors in your GLSL code, and use gDEbugger to check for any GL usage issues.

Lastly, you can re-read the GL specifications at the same time as inspecting your code with a fine-tooth-comb to check for usage errors that your nVidia driver is tolerating.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
put a #version 130 tag on top of the shader (or another more widely supported version, such as 120)
that will make nvidia drivers start following the GLSL spec

other than that, ATI can be a nightmare in compatibility mode
and Intel drivers is something every coder on this planet is trying hard to destroy with lazer eyes
personally i just pretend they dont exist :) but each to his/her own
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Kaptein' timestamp='1351924685' post='4996790']
put a #version 130 tag on top of the shader (or another more widely supported version, such as 120)
that will make nvidia drivers start following the GLSL specs/her own
[/quote]
Are you sure? I'm perfectly sure that NV has ignored #version till recently maybe.
NV allowed mixing even GLSL and Cg in the same code (please correct me if this is not the case any more).

So, in short, there is no way to know how the program will execute on the particular combination of hardware and driver unless you actually try it.

Yesterday I had such problem. Something that works on all NV, AMD and Intel cards I tried simple didn't work on client's machine with NV card. Reason: old drivers that don't handle creation of "new" context (GL3+) correctly. The problem is setting attributes that are not known in the time driver was made. Instead of just ignoring them, like the spec says, context is created correctly, but the application crashes when try to access it.

I know it is hard, but if one really wants to have a stable application he/she should check GL/GLSL version and GPU ID and has a different path for different combinations. [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.png[/img]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Aks9' timestamp='1351944336' post='4996837']
I know it is hard, but if one really wants to have a stable application he/she should check GL/GLSL version and GPU ID and has a different path for different combinations
[/quote]Or use GL on Apple and D3D on Windows --- situations where drivers are actually required to be compliant [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/dry.png[/img] [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure why Hodgman got a -1 above because his answer is a correct description of the situation. It's an unfortunate reality that in many cases your choice boils down to either finding a lowest common denominator that works on everything, or starting to implement driver-specific workarounds scattered throughout your code (that may be invalidated by a new driver revision in a few months time).

[quote name='Aks9' timestamp='1351944336' post='4996837']
Yesterday I had such problem. Something that works on all NV, AMD and Intel cards I tried simple didn't work on client's machine with NV card. Reason: old drivers that don't handle creation of "new" context (GL3+) correctly. The problem is setting attributes that are not known in the time driver was made. Instead of just ignoring them, like the spec says, context is created correctly, but the application crashes when try to access it.
[/quote]

This exposes rule #1 - make it a requirement that your customers upgrade their drivers. Refuse to support them if they don't. Make that your policy and make sure that it's clearly stated up-front. That's a harsh stance to take, and may be easier said than done, but it's your time that we're talking about here and you need to decide which is the most productive use of your time - adding extra cool stuff to your program or chasing down wacky driver bugs for the one customer who refuses to update their drivers.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By sandor_deak
      Hi,
      I started to learn OpenGL about 3 months ago and I've been working on a game engine which uses tools from Riemannian geometry to display curved spaces. Here is a link to a video. (It has a lot to improve yet.) I'm a mathematician but I would like to work in the game industry in a programmer role and I'm making this engine to build my portfolio. I would appreciate some feedback and opinions about the engine, how "convincing" it is as a portfolio, and also some advice about the game industry. Thanks a lot!
    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
  • Popular Now