Sign in to follow this  

How to reduce 3rd party library dependencies?

This topic is 1900 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Currently working a school project which happens to be a multiplayer 2D platform / fighting game, I'm now organizing all the classes in different subgroups, mainly to allow a certain level of abstraction when handling game objects.

Basically right now this is what worked out for object events / handling / viewing:
[indent=1]An [i]Object [/i]class allows abstraction for game object updating.[/indent]
[indent=1]An [i]Input[/i] class represents a state of user input (keyboard, mouse, joystick).[/indent]
[indent=1]A [i]View[/i] class provides an interface for display, and will probably be extended by an [i]Animation[/i] class.[/indent]

[indent=1]Associated [i]Observer[/i] classes update these [i]Subjects[/i]' state ([url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_pattern"]Observer pattern[/url])[/indent]

The idea is to do the 3rd party-specific operations in the [i]Observer[/i] classes (events -> [i]Listener[/i], rendering -> [i]Canvas[/i]).

For example, for the Input module:
[source lang="cpp"]
struct Input
{
class Mouse
{
public:
enum Button
{
Any = 0,
Left = 1,
Right = 2,
// etc...
};
bool IsDown(Button = Any) const;

protected:
friend class Listener;
void setDown(Button);
void setPos(int, int);

private:
int btns_down_;
int x_, y_;
} mouse;

class Keyboard
{
public:
enum Key
{
A, B, C, // etc...
};
bool IsDown(Key) const;

protected:
friend class Listener;
void setDown(Key);

private:
std::set<Key> keys_down_;
} keyboard;

// similar for joystick

};
[/source]

But so far I can't figure out how to do this specifically in the observers, without introducing dependencies in the [i]Subject[/i] classes. This problem is mainly present concerning an object's view: concrete classes need knowledge about camera, alpha blending, coloring, etc...

Besides the obvious impossible solutions like "code up SFML / SDL / Allegro / whatever", what options do I have?
Is it actually possible (in practical cases) to separate these APIs from the game core, and if so, is this overkill?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The typical approach is to encapsulate the 3rd party library within a class or possibly a group of classes, which then become the public interface used by the rest of your program.
Why is Input a struct? It looks to me like you're trying to use it as a namespace. Just use namespaces :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Encapsulating the library is exactly my point, this was what I was going for at first, but in that case I would roughly need to write wrappers and callbacks for a bunch of classes.
Is there a way to avoid this, or should I just shut up and code?

Oh and Input used to be a namespace actually [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png[/img], I can't remember why it was decided to change it to a struct though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't really think of a way to avoid writing wrappers. The trick is to design the wrappers well. You're unlikely to use the entirety of a given library, so there's little use wrapping what you won't need for your project. Also, you may be able to simplify some calls, or generalize the interface if you intend to allow a choice of libraries. This would require writing a wrapper for each library, but so long as they share an interface (using an abstract class in c++) then you could swap one for the other with no change needed to the rest of your code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1900 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this