• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
SolarChronus

Binary Search Tree Remove Node Critique

2 posts in this topic

I have written the code needed to remove a node from a non-self balancing BST. I've put it through every test I could think of and it seems to be pretty solid, but the method is pretty long. I have been trying to figure out a way to re-factor it to make it more streamlined (if that is possible?). However I haven't had much luck. The code for removing a node with a single child is pretty much identical. The only difference is that the children they get/set are their opposite. I figure some special pointer magic would make this work but haven't had any luck.

[CODE]
template<class T>
void BinarySearchTree<T>::remove(BSTNode<T>* nodeToDelete)
{
sorted = false;
if(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild() == nullptr && nodeToDelete->getRightChild() == nullptr) //No Children
{
if(root == nodeToDelete)
root = nullptr;
setParentsChildNodeToNull(nodeToDelete);
eraseNode(nodeToDelete);
}
else if(nodeToDelete->getRightChild() == nullptr) //Left child only
{
BSTNode<T>* newRoot = maximum(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild());

if(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild() != newRoot)
{
if(newRoot->getLeftChild())
{
newRoot->getParent()->setRightChild(newRoot->getLeftChild());
newRoot->getLeftChild()->setParent(newRoot->getParent());
}
else
{
newRoot->getParent()->setRightChild(nullptr);
}
nodeToDelete->getLeftChild()->setParent(newRoot);
newRoot->setLeftChild(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild());
}
newRoot->setParent(nodeToDelete->getParent());
if(newRoot->getParent() != nullptr)
replaceOldChildInParent(nodeToDelete, newRoot);
if(nodeToDelete == root)
root = newRoot;
eraseNode(nodeToDelete);
}
else if(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild() == nullptr) //Right child only
{
BSTNode<T>* newRoot = minimum(nodeToDelete->getRightChild());

if(nodeToDelete->getRightChild() != newRoot)
{
if(newRoot->getRightChild())
{
newRoot->getParent()->setLeftChild(newRoot->getRightChild());
newRoot->getRightChild()->setParent(newRoot->getParent());
}
else
{
newRoot->getParent()->setLeftChild(nullptr);
}
nodeToDelete->getRightChild()->setParent(newRoot);
newRoot->setRightChild(nodeToDelete->getRightChild());
}
newRoot->setParent(nodeToDelete->getParent());
if(newRoot->getParent() != nullptr)
replaceOldChildInParent(nodeToDelete, newRoot);
if(nodeToDelete == root)
root = newRoot;
eraseNode(nodeToDelete);
}
else //Both children exsist
{
BSTNode<T>* newRoot = maximum(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild());
if(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild() != newRoot)
{
if(newRoot->getLeftChild())
{
newRoot->getParent()->setRightChild(newRoot->getLeftChild());
newRoot->getLeftChild()->setParent(newRoot->getParent());
}
else
{
newRoot->getParent()->setRightChild(nullptr);
}
nodeToDelete->getLeftChild()->setParent(newRoot);
newRoot->setLeftChild(nodeToDelete->getLeftChild());
}
newRoot->setRightChild(nodeToDelete->getRightChild());
newRoot->getRightChild()->setParent(newRoot);
newRoot->setParent(nodeToDelete->getParent());
if(newRoot->getParent() != nullptr)
replaceOldChildInParent(nodeToDelete, newRoot);
if(nodeToDelete == root)
root = newRoot;
eraseNode(nodeToDelete);
}
}
[/CODE]
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems like a lot of code to remove a node. Wait, just looked over my own binary tree delete code.

[CODE]
tree* left = node->left, right = node->right;
// Has 2 Children
if( left->value && right->value ) {
// Move left nodes to leftmost right node
// Get leftmost right node
tree* successor = right;
while( successor->left->value )
successor = successor->left;
delete successor->left;
successor->left = left;
// Replace this node with right node
delete node->value;
node->value = right->value;
node->left = right->left;
node->right = right->right;
delete right;
}
// Has left child
else if( left->value ) {
// No right value, so delete
delete right;
// Delete this node's value and replace it with left node value
delete node->value;
node->value = left->value;
node->left = left->left;
node->right = left->right;
// Delete left node
delete left;
} else if( right->value ) {
// No left value so delete
delete left;
// Delete this node's value and replace it with right node value
delete node->value;
node->value = right->value;
node->left = right->left;
node->right = right->right;
// Delete right node
delete right;
} else {
// This node becomes dead leaf
delete node->value;
node->value = NULL;
delete left;
delete right;
}
return node;
[/CODE]
Seems about right.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For reference, here's an ordered binary tree remove function that I wrote some time ago which uses the less-than operator for ordering and returns the removed node rather than deleting it:[code]// O(n) : Remove selected item - caller responsible for deallocation
template <class TNode, class TKey>
TNode *TreeRemove(TNode *&head, TKey &rem) {
TNode *found;
//unexpected case: the item was not even in the tree
if (head == NULL) {
return NULL; // Not found
} else if (rem < *head) {
//the item to be removed is in the left sub-tree
return TreeRemove(head->left, rem);
} else if (*head < rem) {
//the item to be removed is in the right sub-tree
return TreeRemove(head->right, rem);
} else {
//if we got here then we have found the item
found = head;
if (head->left == NULL) {
//there is no left node, put the right one as the new parent
//the right could be NULL, but if so this also does what we want.
head = head->right;
} else if (head->right == NULL) {
//there was no right node, but we already know there is a left one so use that
head = head->left;
} else {
//difficult case: We need to find a replacement for this node in the tree.
//this uses leftmost node of the right sub-tree
TNode *temp = TreeRemoveMin_Aux(head->right);
//now copy all of the old details in the node being reused
temp->left = head->left;
temp->right = head->right;
//switch it with the old one
head = temp;
}
return found;
}
}
template <class TNode>
TNode *TreeRemoveMin_Aux(TNode *&head) {
TNode *found;
//special case used for finding the node to replace a higher deleted node
if (head->left != NULL)
found = TreeRemoveMin_Aux(head->left);
else {
//if we got here then we have found the item
found = head;
//there is no left node, put any right one as the new parent
head = head->right;
}
return found;
}[/code]
I think you'll agree that it's considerably less complex, and probably still shorter despite the thorough commenting. Edited by iMalc
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0