Sign in to follow this  
MylesEvans

OpenGL Can someone explain glOrtho to me in plain english?

Recommended Posts

MylesEvans    151
I've been led to believe that in order to invert the y-axis for my 2d game I need to use glOrtho;but looking up information on it leads to definitions such as this.

void WINAPI glOrtho(
GLdouble left,
GLdouble right,
GLdouble bottom,
GLdouble top,
GLdouble zNear,
GLdouble zFar
);

Parameters
left
The coordinates for the left vertical clipping plane.
right
The coordinates for theright vertical clipping plane.
bottom
The coordinates for the bottom horizontal clipping plane.
top
The coordinates for the top horizontal clipping plans.
zNear
The distances to the nearer depth clipping plane. This distance is negative if the plane is to be behind the viewer.
zFar
The distances to the farther depth clipping plane. This distance is negative if the plane is to be behind the viewer.

I code in c++ mainly using sdl (but I use it with Opengl which I am not too familiar)

I just need to understand what it does so I can invert the y axis.

I have this problem where when I use SDL to get mouse coordinates (mouse.motion.x/y). When I attach an object Ive draw to the mouse (so it moves with the mouse) whenever I move the mouse up the object goes down and when I move it down it goes up. The x offset is fine though.

If I could just invert the y-axis it will all be fine. When I move the mouse up/down the object will follow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SuperVGA    1132
It defines the rectangle in pixels, in which the orthographic projection takes place.
Swapping top and bottom might do the trick,
but it could lead to the rectangle having a negative height, and perhaps some issues follow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344
Let's just focus on the meaning of one pair of parameters, the other two pairs work the same. Let's take the [i]bottom[/i] and [i]top [/i]parameters as an example since you're talking about the Y-axis.

The function in itself is used to specify the visible coordinate range for your screen (actually, for the viewport, but let's say the viewport covers the whole screen). That is, the value of the [i]bottom[/i] parameter specifies the Y-coordinate corresponding to the bottom edge of the screen, and the [i]top[/i] parameter specifies the Y-coordinate corresponding to the top of the screen. So if you specify [i]bottom [/i]as 0 and [i]top[/i] as 100, then everything that has a Y-coordinate between 0 and 100 will appear on the screen, where 0 is the bottom, 50 is in the middle and 100 is at the top.

So to invert the Y-axis, just swap the [i]bottom[/i] and [i]top[/i] parameter values. Thus, if you specify [i]bottom[/i] as 100 and [i]top[/i] as 0, then you have your inverted Y-axis since 0 now corresponds to the top of the screen and 100 to the bottom of the screen.

But that may or may not be the solution you're after. You're also taking about the problem being the mouse cursor, so it could very well be that a bottom-to-top coordinate is what you actually want, but that you just want to invert the actual mouse coordinate. In that case, just subtract the height from the mouse's Y-coordinate: [i]y=height-1-y[/i].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
larspensjo    1561
And then, glOrtho() may not be what you are looking for as it is Legacy OpenGL. Have a look at [url="http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Legacy_OpenGL"]http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Legacy_OpenGL[/url] and make sure this is the road you want to go.

Still, understanding glOrtho() helps you even if you would decide not to use Legacy OpenGL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MylesEvans    151
[quote name='Brother Bob' timestamp='1352390791' post='4998910']
Let's just focus on the meaning of one pair of parameters, the other two pairs work the same. Let's take the [i]bottom[/i] and [i]top [/i]parameters as an example since you're talking about the Y-axis.

The function in itself is used to specify the visible coordinate range for your screen (actually, for the viewport, but let's say the viewport covers the whole screen). That is, the value of the [i]bottom[/i] parameter specifies the Y-coordinate corresponding to the bottom edge of the screen, and the [i]top[/i] parameter specifies the Y-coordinate corresponding to the top of the screen. So if you specify [i]bottom [/i]as 0 and [i]top[/i] as 100, then everything that has a Y-coordinate between 0 and 100 will appear on the screen, where 0 is the bottom, 50 is in the middle and 100 is at the top.

So to invert the Y-axis, just swap the [i]bottom[/i] and [i]top[/i] parameter values. Thus, if you specify [i]bottom[/i] as 100 and [i]top[/i] as 0, then you have your inverted Y-axis since 0 now corresponds to the top of the screen and 100 to the bottom of the screen.

But that may or may not be the solution you're after. You're also taking about the problem being the mouse cursor, so it could very well be that a bottom-to-top coordinate is what you actually want, but that you just want to invert the actual mouse coordinate. In that case, just subtract the height from the mouse's Y-coordinate: [i]y=height-1-y[/i].
[/quote]

This makes sense. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now