Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL To glut or not to glut...

This topic is 1894 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm going to be modifying the source code from [url="http://ogldev.atspace.co.uk/"]these tutorials [/url] (Now available as Visual Studio 2010 Project files. YAY!) and use it as a code base for my graphics engine. These tutorials use glut to handle windowing and callbacks. I always used the Windows API for my OpenGL applications because my understanding was that it was the 'grown up way', it offered more flexibility and customization, and also glut seemed to be fading into obscurity, at least on Windows. But I'm trying to determine if its worth the effort to remove GLUT and replace it with direct Windows API calls. In the future I hope to make use of some type of Game-pad and I don't think glut offers a whole lot of options for that. More specifically, I don't believe it supports force-feedback and I'd have to use a more advanced input API. I'm not sure if glut would play nice with that, given its current input and callback mechanisms.

Can I hear some opinions? Is it unprofessional to use GLUT in a modern application? Will it hold me back in any way? Edited by mv348

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I suppose you mean freeglut, and not glut. Glut is indeed very old and not supported.

Personally, I prefer glfw instead of *glut. But glfw doesn't support fore-feedback either (though it is considered for 3.0). I feel glfw as a more mature library than *glut.

The tutorials you link to seem to be "almost" up-to-date, but not completely. They are not using Vertex Array Objects, which is mandatory from OpenGL 3.

For a very good, minimal example, see [url="https://github.com/progschj/OpenGL-Examples"]https://github.com/progschj/OpenGL-Examples[/url]. Starting from the basic, to advanced. They are minimal in the sense that every example is only one file, and does only just what is needed and nothing more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
glut was originally made to support the OpenGL redbook examples (without having to deal with platform specific code), it is not a complete API and shouldn't be used in serious applications and yes it will hold you back. (main problem imo is that it takes over the game loop)

Personally i wouldn't use the Windows API with OpenGL either since it is a pain in the ass to write platform specific code (and AFAIK Win32 doesn't include force feedback support either, you probably have to use DirectInput on Windows for that), something like SFML + OIS might be a good combination though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your responses!

[quote]The tutorials you link to seem to be "almost" up-to-date, but not completely. They are not using Vertex Array Objects, which is mandatory from OpenGL 3.[/quote]

I did not know it was mandatory (Is it really? In the sense that it won't even work?) But they introduced VAO's back in [url="http://ogldev.atspace.co.uk/www/tutorial32/tutorial32.html"]Tutorial 32[/url] and have used them from there on.

So yes, let us clarify, turns out it is in fact FreeGlut that the tutorials use for Windows.

[quote]
Personally i wouldn't use the Windows API with OpenGL either since it is a pain in the ass to write platform specific code
[/quote]

Really? I thought it would be harder to make my code cross-platform compatible than to just go with a single platform.

So I'd need DirectInput for force feedback? Hmm.. that's annoying...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mv348' timestamp='1352498215' post='4999442']
[quote]The tutorials you link to seem to be "almost" up-to-date, but not completely. They are not using Vertex Array Objects, which is mandatory from OpenGL 3.[/quote]

I did not know it was mandatory (Is it really? In the sense that it won't even work?) But they introduced VAO's back in [url="http://ogldev.atspace.co.uk/www/tutorial32/tutorial32.html"]Tutorial 32[/url] and have used them from there on.[/quote]
It is possible to use OpenGL in compatibility mode, where legacy API is available. This support is probably not going to go away for a long time yet, so it isn't much of a problem. As you already understand the VAO, it looks to me like a good tutorial. As long as it isn't based on [url="http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Legacy_OpenGL"]immediate mode[/url], I think you are fine.

[quote][quote]
Personally i wouldn't use the Windows API with OpenGL either since it is a pain in the ass to write platform specific code
[/quote]

Really? I thought it would be harder to make my code cross-platform compatible than to just go with a single platform.
[/quote]

If you are used to Windows API, it may well be easier. I don't know the Windows API very well, and find glfw (or glut) is easier to use. And then you get portability at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1894 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now