• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

VC2012: cost of recursive capturing lambda function

0 posts in this topic

Not a burning problem - just curiosity:

Using "static std::function<bool(int64u)> fnAdd = [&amp;](int64u tag)->bool { ... fnAdd(...) ... }" produces the suspected/expected, but unnecessary, inline initialization / shutdown code + other pointless overhead:
0000000140021BA2 mov eax,dword ptr [$S2 (0141678770h)] // static initialization check overhead ...
0000000140021BA8 and eax,1
0000000140021BAB test eax,eax
0000000140021BAD jne ResGlShader::update+85h (0140021BF5h) // ... end of check.
0000000140021BAF mov eax,dword ptr [$S2 (0141678770h)] // one time overhead ...
0000000140021BB5 or eax,1
0000000140021BB8 mov dword ptr [$S2 (0141678770h)],eax // this whole flag check/update looks completely bonkers - i suspect some crazy cache optimization (bit-packing multiple flags into one 32bit memory location?).
// capture code ... all i need is "this" and one local ("valid"), but it stores also what i am using via this - probably for performance reasons.
0000000140021BBE lea r9,[valid]
0000000140021BC3 mov r8,qword ptr [this]
0000000140021BCB lea rdx,[sources]
0000000140021BD0 lea rcx,[rsp+60h]
// the storing part is moved elsewhere (over a dozen loads and stores) - probably for instruction cache reasons (it should have moved most of the leading garbage there too though)
0000000140021BD5 call <lambda_ccd461a2e723c170260c9697d9a65f88>::<lambda_ccd461a2e723c170260c9697d9a65f88> (0140021EA0h)
0000000140021BDA mov rdx,rax
0000000140021BDD lea rcx,[fnAdd (0141678780h)]
// this is terrible ... introduces "malloc"/exceptions ... ffs. None of that is needed ... argh!
0000000140021BE4 call std::function<bool __cdecl(unsigned __int64)>::function<bool __cdecl(unsigned __int64)><<lambda_ccd461a2e723c170260c9697d9a65f88> > (014003A2E0h)
// destruction at program exit ... there is nothing in lambda function to destroy - dealing with std::function ("free") is probably all it does.
0000000140021BE9 lea rcx,[`ResGlShader::update'::`2'::`dynamic atexit destructor for 'fnAdd'' (01400C6380h)]
0000000140021BF0 call atexit (014003E7F0h)
0000000140021BF5 // ... end of skip

// The "fnAdd" function call has some extra std::function overhead too (argh*2):
// /.../ input: int64u param + "this". Stack pointer for local variable does not need passing. Clean and neat.
0000000140021C0C call std::_Func_class<bool,unsigned __int64,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil>::operator() (0140036E00h)
// ... call will land in (std::function check for valid contained function ... completely redundant):
0000000140036E00 mov qword ptr [rsp+10h],rdx
0000000140036E05 sub rsp,28h
0000000140036E09 mov rcx,qword ptr [rcx+18h]
0000000140036E0D test rcx,rcx
0000000140036E10 je std::_Func_class<bool,unsigned __int64,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil,std::_Nil>::operator()+22h (0140036E22h)
0000000140036E12 mov rax,qword ptr [rcx]
0000000140036E15 lea rdx,[_Vx0]
0000000140036E1A call qword ptr [rax+10h] // call for contained function object ... used as variable and not a fixed constant which it actually is x_x. It will land ...
0000000140036E1D add rsp,28h
0000000140036E21 ret
// ... here:
000000014003D430 mov rdx,qword ptr [rdx]
000000014003D433 add rcx,8
000000014003D437 jmp <lambda_ccd461a2e723c170260c9697d9a65f88>::operator() (0140021EF0h) // finally ...

VC does the smart thing on certain conditions (stuff that does not have side effects mainly) and moves such static initializations out of the function body - but it can not do it here. Can i help it?

The "std::function" has many side effects and hence can not be optimized out, but i can not do recursion without it (or did i miss some other workaround that works with VC2012?) !

This is not performance related question (i do not see any situation where it would matter ... if it would matter then i would make a real member function that would have none of the considerable overhead) - it is just for my own educational purposes in regards of lambda functions. So far very pleased with them - just that doing recursion with them is a f* disaster (works fine, just looks like a disaster).

Well, one can not use "static" often with lambdas, so overhead there is mostly unavoidable - except getting rid of std::function. Giving up for now (aka. using a real function) - but leaving the question open in case a better solution shows up. Edited by tanzanite7

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0