• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tocs1001

Two Co-Op offers.

3 posts in this topic

My university has "Co-operative Education" where they send us out to work in industry for a semester or two to gain experience and contacts.

I have received two offers for my next round of co-op

One for a company which does 3D data processing for consumer products. The particular bit of work I'd be doing is working on their application which takes CAD data and then runs physics simulations on it. So they can digitally crush, smash, and throw product designs. I'd be doing a lot of OpenGL and 3D data work, so I think it would still be relevant to my end goal of a job in the game industry.

The other is for the only game studio my university has contacts with. While a game studio, they produce games that I'm not really that excited about (Educational / Promotional games). As well as some of their work looking a little less than easy on the eyes. It would still most likely be a fun place to work and an interesting experience.

So my question is, would it be "better" for me to work at the game studio, or should I go to the simulation job? I'd would enjoy both jobs a lot. But I'm not sure which would help me more towards getting a job at a game studio that produces games I'd be more interested in myself.

Any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks,
~Tocs Edited by Tocs1001
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Tocs1001' timestamp='1352829834' post='5000627']
So my question is, would it be "better" for me to work at the game studio, or should I go to the simulation job.
[/quote]

"Better" is subjective. YOU have to be the person to decide which is "better" for YOU. I recommend you make a decision grid.
Your preference should be a factor in your decision (you get to let your "feelings" be part of your decision).
Back out to the Breaking In forum main page and look for the FAQ link at upper right. You'll find information on how to make decisions there.
Also, questions should end with a question mark.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that we have the obligatory RTFM and grammar mistake out of the way...In my attempt to keep my question shorter than a book I suppose I didn't convey my point.


I did in fact read the FAQ page on decisions. Despite working on a decision grid, I wasn't sure how each experience would weigh in on my resume. And thus was unable to complete the grid in its entirety. I was also looking for consequences I might not have thought up.

Things like "If the person reading your resume looks up a studio you worked at and see's their work is kind of lack luster, you'll be less likely to be hired." or "Any kind of previous work at a game studio makes you look like a great candidate." or "The work you do at any studio would help you as a game play programmer, but if you want to be more geared towards engine development the technical work with simulation job might make you more desirable." or "The two jobs are pretty much interchangeable from a resume reader's standpoint, your real substance will be in your portfolio." These notions might be absurd or spot on, I have no idea. Hence, my post inquiring for thoughts about the two job offers.


Perhaps I haven't done enough "internet legwork", but I haven't found much to help me in weighing these potential experiences against each other. I was hoping for some insight in that regard, not a guide to general decision making.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Tocs1001' timestamp='1352866868' post='5000783']
I did in fact read the FAQ page on decisions. Despite working on a decision grid, I wasn't sure how each experience would weigh in on my resume. And thus was unable to complete the grid in its entirety.
[/quote]

Okay, now we're getting specific. Good. Which parts of your grid were you having trouble with? It says in the FAQ that when you're stuck, do research on that matter -- and it also says that some of the things you may think are important criteria are actually unknowable. So, rather than getting your claws out, ask us about those problem parts of your grid.

[quote]
0. I was also looking for consequences I might not have thought up.
Things like
1. "If the person reading your resume looks up a studio you worked at and see's their work is kind of lack luster, you'll be less likely to be hired." or
2. "Any kind of previous work at a game studio makes you look like a great candidate." or
3. "The work you do at any studio would help you as a game play programmer, but if you want to be more geared towards engine development the technical work with simulation job might make you more desirable." or
4. "The two jobs are pretty much interchangeable from a resume reader's standpoint, your real substance will be in your portfolio."
5. These notions might be absurd or spot on, I have no idea. Hence, my post inquiring for thoughts about the two job offers.
[/quote]

0. It's kinda hard to tell you what you haven't thought of. You should just think of what you consider might be pros and cons, then look further into those.
1. No, you don't get judged by the company that kept you. Good people work at poorly run companies. Bad people work at great companies.
2. I wouldn't say that exactly.
3. [Can't respond to that one]
4. Both jobs are conversation starters. The important thing is how you comport yourself in the conversation, and what you say.
5. Not absurd. Just ask focused questions like that. Edited by Tom Sloper
forgot #5
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0