Sign in to follow this  
dtg108

Best language to start programming in?

Recommended Posts

alvaro    21246
Although I agree with the spirit of Seraph's post, I recently installed SFML with C++ on Linux and I didn't have any of those problems. The simplest Ubuntu install puts the header files and library files in the standard places, and I just need to add some -lsfml-blah options to my compile command, but I just got them from the tutorial on the SFML website and it worked fine on the first attempt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
[quote name='Álvaro' timestamp='1354563349' post='5006736']
Although I agree with the spirit of Seraph's post, I recently installed SFML with C++ on Linux and I didn't have any of those problems. The simplest Ubuntu install puts the header files and library files in the standard places, and I just need to add some -lsfml-blah options to my compile command, but I just got them from the tutorial on the SFML website and it worked fine on the first attempt.
[/quote]

The problem I described is what happens when you work with Visual Studio 2010. SFML is shipped in binary form for 2008 only, and the two binary formats are not compatible, so you need to recompile SFML if you want to using VS2010. If you use Visual Studio 2008, the experience is flawless. That said, it's when things dont go perfectly smooth, or when the tutorial misses a step, that the newbie is now starting their descent down a deep dark bottomless pit of hell.

I didn't mean it as a shot at SFML, it's just a real world example that comes to mind. Linux often actually makes the build process a much easier prospect in many cases, until it breaks or you end up in dependency hell that is. There are different problems too on different platforms. XCode, well, its just awful... but even trying to figure out how to create a C++ application is a bit of a nightmare ( command line utility anyone? ) and Apple has this nasty habit of moving frameworks and library files around, or just getting rid of them completely between OS versions and patches. Another issue that comes to mind is CodeBlocks ships with SFML templates, that simply dont work. Plus it ships (on Windows ) with a version of GCC that simply isn't compatible with SFML at all, requiring you to replace your compilier completely if you go that route.

In a nutshell, the overly complicated build process is going to bite you, in some way, shape or form, regardless to what platform you call home. Edited by Serapth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
Some C++ fan is burning a lot of karma on this thread...

FYI, you aren't supposed to up or down vote because you disagree or agree with an opinion. In that regard, you should post a comment with your discourse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3Ddreamer    3826
[quote name='Khaiy' timestamp='1354422000' post='5006204']
I personally recommend C# with SFML
[/quote]

When did they release a C# binding? I missed that one.


Clinton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
[quote name='3Ddreamer' timestamp='1354591417' post='5006948']
[quote name='Khaiy' timestamp='1354422000' post='5006204']
I personally recommend C# with SFML
[/quote]

When did they release a C# binding? I missed that one.


Clinton
[/quote]

As far back as 1.6 at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PurpleAmethyst    335
My €0.02 is Python, Java, C#. In that order (of preference, not learning).

Learning some basic C, as to how it handles memory allocation, may help you understand what is going on in hardware too. Not enough people learn that stuff any more. Edited by PurpleAmethyst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SimonForsman    7642
[quote name='Álvaro' timestamp='1354563349' post='5006736']
Although I agree with the spirit of Seraph's post, I recently installed SFML with C++ on Linux and I didn't have any of those problems. The simplest Ubuntu install puts the header files and library files in the standard places, and I just need to add some -lsfml-blah options to my compile command, but I just got them from the tutorial on the SFML website and it worked fine on the first attempt.
[/quote]

alot of things are far easier in Linux these days (Especially application and library installations). If you download the source tarball instead of pulling the dev package from the ubuntu repository you're in for a world of pain though.
My main problem with Linux today is that some developers still seem to think that all Linux users know how to and want to compile their own software, SFML still gets this wrong. (It shouldn't be that difficult to toss up a apt:libsfml-dev link on the website to make life easier for beginners who happen to google for sfml rather than search for it using the package manager).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kop0113    2453
[quote name='SimonForsman' timestamp='1354628197' post='5007068']
My main problem with Linux today is that some developers still seem to think that all Linux users know how to and want to compile their own software
[/quote]

I agree and if you look at the amount of patches that the packages for Ubuntu or Fedora have to write to get software to compile on their distributions then it will quickly be obvious that it is too awkward to compile from source these days (I blame GNU Autotools for being defective but I digress).

However, this isn't really to do with languages any more. For example, when I had to compile the MonoGame C# binding on Fedora 16, it was a horrible experience!
Much worse than something like the native SDL C library which has been tried and tested on many many distributions and is now extremely portable across them and actually built without any issues.

Though one thing that I thought was cool was the OpenTk Windows .dll worked perfectly on FreeBSD without needing any recompiling. (The best example I have seen of C# being truely cross platform). Edited by Karsten_

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For a beginner game programmer, the biggest problem is things are just frustrating initially as you are learning new language(s), game development concepts, and game API's (whether low level ones built into a language or something like OpenGL or a higher level toolkit). Learning programming can initially be a frustrating experience so anything that reduces that frustration and gets you seeing solid results is almost always the way to go.

Performance should be the least of your concerns as a beginner game programmer; the goal you need to first overcome is completing a few very basic games. Creating a fully functional, low FPS-performance, basic game in say GameMaker is going to be much more rewarding and get you where you want to be going faster than trying to create a 100 module, C++ / Assembly optimized game using your own custom low-level high performance multi-platform game engine. Your chances of creating the former are not too bad, but of creating the later as your first major programming project are probably about 1 in 10,000.

The first question a beginner should ask themselves is not which language to learn first, but what project do they first want to complete and on what platform. It should be something simple, like Pong or Tetris at most in complexity, and should definitely be 2D, not 3D. Along with this question is which platform do you want to target. XBox / PS are too complex for a beginner as an initial platform; the platform should be either web-based, Desktop PC/Mac, or Mobile.

It's fine to have a long term bigger goal, such as the very common "I want to design and create a MMORPG on Desktop PC/Mac, like World of Warcraft but with far nicer features". Just as long as you translate that long term vision into a very tiny, doable stepping stone. In this case, your stepping stone is first that it means you decided on a target platform of Desktop PC/Mac. Then for your first project, you might do some very tiny 2D game aspect of it, such as a basic Mini-Map where you appear as a dot that can move around it using the cursor keys.

For a 2D game on a mobile platform for a beginner, I would definitely advise Corona (which uses Lua as a development language) to start. You can have something animated move across a scene in under 10 lines of code. Lua is an easy to use high level language that is great for this kind of thing.

For a 2D game on the desktop platform for a beginner, I would choose Love2D, again in Lua. Much like Corona it is very easy to get started quickly even for a beginner and has lots of great advice in its documentation and forums.

For browser-based games, I'm not as familiar but GameMaker would probably be a good starting option.


Over time, you will become more familiar with basic concepts, such as 2D animation, 2D scenes, simple user input, simple game states, programming basics such as variable declaration, loops, and creating functions, and game-wise you will start getting a better sense of what you can realistically accomplish. Eventually, you can move onto other concepts such as Object Oriented Programming and try out some other languages and SDK's to get a broader feel of the available methodologies and tools.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KimboTiger    123
I recommend to learn C from this book [url="http://www.amazon.com/C-Nutshell-OReilly-Peter-Prinz/dp/0596006977"]C in a Nutshell[/url] and would you would need to have access to linux/osx as your development system.
When your through with the 200 pages (part 1) you would have gone from totally nothing to an advance beginner.
What I really like about this book is that you write your example code (getting coding exercise) while reading about the subject.
You could learn C with in a week and if you're fast even less time.

After that you're next step should learning C++, after that OpenGL, then then ... before you know it you are creating games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
[quote name='KimboTiger' timestamp='1354715503' post='5007391']
You could learn C with in a week and if you're fast even less time.
[/quote]

With prior programming experience, perhaps, and even then I doubt it. As a first language, no bloody way. C is a fairly simple language, but it would still take much longer than a week to learn, and certainly much longer than that to master.

Unless we are seriously stretching the definition of "learn". I mean, you could memorize the C keywords in an afternoon, but I would hardly call that learning the language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alvaro    21246
[quote name='KimboTiger' timestamp='1354715503' post='5007391']
You could learn C with in a week and if you're fast even less time.
[/quote]

Peter Norvig (head of research at Google) [url="http://norvig.com/21-days.html"]has something to say about this[/url].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='KimboTiger' timestamp='1354715503' post='5007391']
You could learn C with in a week and if you're fast even less time.
[/quote][img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.png[/img]
We spend a semester coaching M.Sc. students (who all have previous programming experience in another language) with C, and at the end of that their skills are quite shaky. If we could get them even to that point in a month, that would be awesome. A week would be a miracle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dynamo_Maestro    769
Based on what you have said I would highly recommend C#, most of the main reasons have been said already, but one thing I think is often overlooked is you can take advantage of web development (if you ever need to) using ASP.NET MVC (not WebForms) which is amazing imo. You also get other libraries and features you can work with such as WCF, Windows Services, SQL CLR Integration etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ftn    462
C++'s strength is the RAII, and it's weakness's are the C compatibility and weak library support. You need ton of knowledge to set up environment and write basic Win32 application without using some crappy GUI library (and all GUI libraries in c++ are crappy imo). Most of the internet, books and open source projects practice poor c++ programming practices. You need to be very careful not to inject your program with a crappy API. And when you decide what xml, networking, sound, and math libraries you'll use, they will be all in different coding style. Unless you wrap them (all and whole API's) all up, you're left with source code with 5 different coding conventions and workaround for the poor quirks from their poor design.

C# has extensive library, and it's all uniform syntax. Even 3rd party libraries follow the MS conventions. It also has better IDE and dev tools. It is much faster to develop at the beginning. There are many design flaws in the dotnet classes, some originating from the flaws of the language, and some just poor OO design. In the end it can get very verbose syntax wise (even more so than c++), and you have to be very careful if you want to do anything deterministically.

Java's design has been flawed from get-go, and the repairs haven't worked yet.

Overall, at high level, most concise source code will come from c++, but getting there will take lot of of code and might require you to build "meta language" with lower level classes first.

Now, after being out of picture for a long time for c++, Microsoft seems to invest heavily in (modern) c++ now. Maybe they will try to create some decent library for the first time ever. There's even some hints that they might try and make native compiler for C#.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
In a thread like this, in this forum, you shouldn't just drop acronyms the RAII.


Speaking of which, RAII is [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Acquisition_Is_Initialization"]Resource Acquisition is Initialization[/url]. If it seems needlessly complicated for such a simple concept... welcome to C++.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Serapth    6671
[quote name='Codarki' timestamp='1354746543' post='5007547']
There are many design flaws in the dotnet classes, some originating from the flaws of the language, and some just poor OO design. In the end it can get very verbose syntax wise (even more so than c++), and you have to be very careful if you want to do anything deterministically.
[/quote]

Careful here. Obviously in such a large library, there are bound to be a few mistakes in the library, but for the most part, the .NET libraries have stood the test of time extremely well. The lack of generics in the runtime at launch obviously had a bit of an impact, but not a gigantic one.

BUT...

Lets go apples to apples here. You cant really compared C# with .NET to C++, because C# will clobber the living crap out of C++ in this comparison. The standard C++ libraries are downright anaemic Moving beyond that, due to 20+ years of legacy, even though the provide almost nothing, they are still loaded with far more mistakes and cruft than even the massive .NET libraries.

I have never EVER heard anyone claim the .NET libraries as a negative, especially when comparing to C++. Edited by Serapth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Codarki' timestamp='1354746543' post='5007547']
Overall, at high level, most concise source code will come from c++
[/quote]You mean, compared to Java and friends? C++ has nowhere near the amount of expressivity that higher level languages do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luau Design DF    231
You're already working with Unity so just start by learning the Java Script the engine uses. Algorithms are what make stuff work, not languages.

Also, there are people that make games, there are people that make middleware and people that make engines. Which one are you? Avoid the noise and tech purist advices like "learn how to make GPUs from scratch" and all that kind of reinventing the wheel stuff. If you want to make games, make games.

Edit:

http://gamasutra.com/view/feature/182860/suck_at_coding_but_make_games_.php Edited by Luis Guimaraes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this