• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
saejox

How to call script objects constructor?

7 posts in this topic

[CODE]
asIScriptObject *obj = static_cast<asIScriptObject*>(engine->CreateUninitializedScriptObject(t->GetTypeId()));

//manually initialize object properties
//Call default constructor, but how?
[/CODE]

That is what i want to do.

How do i call default constructor of an existing object?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you use CreateUnitializedScriptObject() it is exactly because you don't want to call the constructor. This way of creating an object is used when you want to initialize each of the members manually, presumably for deserializing an object from a file.

If you want to create an initialized script object, then either use CreateScriptObject() that calls the default constructor, or call the script object's factory function if you want to use a constructor other than the default constructor.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i need to do it :(

here is why

[CODE]
class Object
{
RigidBody @rigidBody;

Object()
{
rigidBody.setVelocity(Vec3(1,0,0));
}
};

[/CODE]
idea is that when i create this object in c++:
- assign properties
- call constructor
- constructor now has all needed properties to properly initialize object.

alternative is that i force classes to have a init() function that i call after CreateScriptObject.
But then rigidBody in the example above will be null and cause all sorts of confusion for those who wants to use constructor.

So, there are no ways of accomplishing this?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not pass the rigid body as an argument to the Object constructor?

[code]
class Object
{
RigidBody @rigidBody;
Object(RigidBody @rb)
{
@rigidBody = rb;
rigidBody.setVelocity(Vec3(1,0,0));
}
}
[/code]

Then call the factory function to create the object, instead of calling CreateScriptObject().

You find the factory function by calling asIObjectType::GetFactoryByDecl("Object @Object(RigidBody@)").
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in that case i force
-create a constructor with a specific parameters
-must do all the correct assignments in it

that's too much to ask for the scripter.

during design phase i thought asIObjectType::GetMethodByIndex also returns constructors. Combined with CreateUninitializedScriptObject it was enough.

Is there a design limitation for GetMethodByIndex not returning constructors?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just like in C++ the constructor is not an ordinary method. The constructor expects the memory to be unused and it will do [b]all[/b] the initialization.

You're asking to call the constructor on an already (partly) initialized object. This way you may end up with memory leaks as the constructor would overwrite the members that you manually initialized.

If you absolutely must use CreateUnitializedObject() and then manually initialize some of the members before letting the script initialize the rest, then you can only do so with an ordinary class method, e.g. Init().
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, i am gonna ignore the default constructor.

You are working on member initialization in declarations, this will help to reduce usage of default constructor, Great :)
Thank you.

On an unrelated note,
Do you have any plans to add compile time type deduction?
like auto in c++ or var in c#. coz we all are a little lazy.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Possibly. With mixin classes (and possible future mixin functions) 'auto' can certainly make code reuse easier. But it is definitely not a high priority item for me.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0