• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
phil67rpg

breakout objects

6 posts in this topic

I am brushing up on my c++ and object oriented programming skills. I just want to know if my objects are in the right order.
[code]
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class Breakout
{
private:
int bricks;
int paddle;
int ball;
public:
void draw_bricks();
void draw_paddle();
void draw_ball();
void move_ball();
void move_paddle();
void brick_collision();
void paddle_collision();
};

void Breakout::draw_bricks()
{
cout << "Draw Bricks" << endl;
}

void Breakout::draw_paddle()
{
cout << "Draw Paddle" << endl;
}

void Breakout::draw_ball()
{
cout << "Draw Ball" << endl;
}

void Breakout::move_ball()
{
cout << "Move Ball" << endl;
}

void Breakout::move_paddle()
{
cout << "Move Paddle" << endl;
}

void Breakout::brick_collision()
{
cout << "Brick Collision" << endl;
}

void Breakout::paddle_collision()
{
cout << "Paddle Collision" << endl;
}

int main()
{
Breakout bricks;
bricks.draw_bricks();
bricks.draw_paddle();
bricks.draw_ball();
bricks.move_ball();
bricks.move_paddle();
bricks.brick_collision();
bricks.paddle_collision();
return 0;
}
[/code]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The object order doesn't matter. It's personal, put them in the order you find the most logical/important.

I tend to put the most important ones at the top. The most used one or the most critical one.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='phil67rpg' timestamp='1354855687' post='5007994']
[code]
int main()
{
Breakout bricks;
bricks.draw_bricks();
bricks.draw_paddle();
bricks.draw_ball();
bricks.move_ball();
bricks.move_paddle();
bricks.brick_collision();
bricks.paddle_collision();
return 0;
}
[/code]
[/quote]
What i want to ask is, if you call (bricks.move_ball(), bricks.move_paddle()) and then check collision and it turns "Oh they collided" next loop comes, you draw that wrong looking frame.

With that code id put it like this
[code]
Breakout bricks;
bricks.move_ball();
bricks.move_paddle();
bricks.brick_collision();
bricks.paddle_collision();
bricks.draw_bricks();
bricks.draw_paddle();
bricks.draw_ball();
return 0;
[/code]

But it depends how your functions are made, in my code i make it this way
[code]
namespace en
{
enum
{
n_collision = 1,
y_collision = 2
};
};

void check_for_valid_position()
{
//Setup position for next movement for ball
int ball_new_x = ball_position_x + ball_velocity_x,
ball_new_y = ball_position_y + ball_velocity_y;

//Check if the balls new position is valid
if(check_collision(ball_new_x, ball_new_y) == en::y_collision)
// If the new position is invalid reverse ball_velocity x and y
{ /* bounce ball from the object */ }
else
// If the new position is valid, we apply it
{ ball_position_x = ball_new_x; ball_position_y = ball_new_y; }
}
[/code]
The reason behind this is so i don't split ball_move() and ball_collision().
For exzample :
ball_move() moves ball for 5 pixels
ball_colision() detects that's invalid, and ball_collision now most do ball_move() job(move the ball - 5 pixels). Edited by BaneTrapper
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='phil67rpg' timestamp='1354855687' post='5007994']
I just want to know if my objects are in the right order.
[/quote]

There is only one object in your code...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could have an object for your ball, paddle, and bricks, but I guess it's preference as to how you do it. OOP is extremely useful and powerful so my suggest is to make more obejcts.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to add on to what Alvaro is bringing up: you're not actually using Object Oriented programming. You've made a class, but it's just a container for strictly procedural code. Also, as your game doesn't loop, it'll be over immediately.

A helpful heuristic for object oriented design is the "paragraph model". If you were to sit down and write out how your game works (what the code does, or what happens while playing the game) you'd find that [i]most of the time[/i], your objects would be the nouns in the sentences, the verbs would be your object's methods, and adjectives define additional properties of your objects. As an example:

"When the [b]ball [/b][i]collides [/i]with the [b]paddle[/b], it [i]bounces [/i]back in the other direction"

Already I could make an argument for a ball class, a paddle class, and two methods for ball could be Ball::Collide() and Ball::Bounce(). Though my experience tells me that you could simplify the design and make Bounce() just an internal method call inside Collide() that defines how you react to a collision. Edited by BCullis
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0