• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ic0de

OpenGL
My VBO world system. Any thoughts?

9 posts in this topic

In my World structure there are several "chunks" that represent a group of vertices and various vertex attributes, there are three main functions in each chunk: allocate() generates VBOs, upload() sends data to the video card and draw() which obviously draws the chunk, there are also two other functions start3D() and end3D() which sandwich a group of Chunk::draw() calls. I know my structure is pretty solid and it works well. What I'm wondering about is whether my actual OpenGL calls are set up in the best way to maximize performance because gDebugger flagged a bunch of redundant state changes in my draw function and I know that's bad for performance. Anyone know how I could remove redundant state changes and maximize performance assuming I'm targeting GL 2.1

My code is below:

[CODE]
void start3D()
{
glEnableClientState(GL_TEXTURE_COORD_ARRAY);
glEnableClientState(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY);
glEnableClientState(GL_NORMAL_ARRAY);
glEnableVertexAttribArray(attribPointer);
}

void end3D()
{
glDisableClientState(GL_TEXTURE_COORD_ARRAY);
glDisableClientState(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY);
glDisableClientState(GL_NORMAL_ARRAY);
glDisableVertexAttribArray(attribPointer);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, 0);
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::allocate()
{
glGenBuffers(1, &vBuffer); //positions
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(float), NULL, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glGenBuffers(1, &tBuffer); //texcoords
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(float), NULL, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glGenBuffers(1, &nBuffer); //normals
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(float), NULL, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glGenBuffers(1, &tanBuffer); //tangents
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tanBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(float), NULL, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::upload()
{
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tBuffer); //texcoords
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, numtriangles * 6 * sizeof(float), texcoords, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glTexCoordPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer); //positions
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, numtriangles * 9 * sizeof(float), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glVertexPointer(3, GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nBuffer); //normals
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, numtriangles * 9 * sizeof(float), normals, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glNormalPointer(GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tanBuffer); //tangents
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, numtriangles * 12 * sizeof(float), tangents, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
glVertexAttribPointer(attribPointer, 4, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, 0);
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::draw()
{
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glUniform1i(texture_location, 0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, bitmap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1);
glUniform1i(normal_texture_location, 1);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, normap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2);
glUniform1i(height_texture_loc, 2);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, heightmap);


glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tBuffer); //texcoords
glTexCoordPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer); //positions
glVertexPointer(3, GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nBuffer); //normals
glNormalPointer(GL_FLOAT, 0, 0);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tanBuffer); //tangents
glVertexAttribPointer(attribPointer, 4, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, 0);
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, numtriangles*3);
}
[/CODE]

Sample Usage:

[CODE]
chunk1.allocate();
chunk2.allocate();
chunk3.allocate();

start3D();
chunk1.upload();
chunk2.upload();
chunk3.upload();
end3D();

while(running)
{
start3D();
chunk1.draw();
chunk2.draw();
chunk3.draw();
end3D();

//do other stuff
}
[/CODE]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do you have [i]allocate[/i] and [i]upload[/i] as two separate functions if they are supposed to be called together? Are there times where you expect to allocate the buffers but not upload any data?

What is the purpose of allocating empty buffers the size of a single float in the [i]allocate[/i] function? If you actually indent to pre-allocate the whole buffer, you should allocate a buffer large enough to store the actual data you put into it later and then use [i]glBuffer[b]Sub[/b]Data[/i] instead to upload the content to an existing buffer; glBufferData will discard the old buffer and create a new one and your pre-allocated buffer was of no use.

You set the vertex attribute pointers in both the [i]upload[/i] and the [i]draw[/i] functions. Setting the pointers in the upload function serves no purpose since you're not using the binding points anywhere except in the [i]draw[/i] function, and the [i]draw[/i] function already set the attribute pointers.

You don't have to enable the buffers to upload data to them. Your calls to [i]start3D[/i] and [i]stop3D[/i] around the upload calls have no purpose.

I find your setup very limiting because you have generic functions to enable vertex attribute arrays, but they force a specific vertex array layout: any vertex array you draw [i]must [/i]have a position, a normal, a texture coordinate and a generic attribute array; no more, no less. Either you intend to use that function for the [i]Chunk[/i] class only, in which case it is named way too generically named, or you should use a more flexible vertex array system that doesn't force a specific vertex attribute set, but rather enables what is in use. If you intend to only use the functions for the [i]Chunk[/i] class, then put the two helper functions in the chunk class to show that they are for the [i]Chunk[/i] class specifically and nothing else.

The redundant state changes I can see are, except for setting the attribute pointers in the [i]upload[/i] function, could be the result of the very limited test bed you have in the while loop. The while loop calls [i]end3D[/i] and then calls [i]start3D[/i] again in the next iteration. Unless "// do other stuff" actually depends on [i]end3D[/i] being called, the observable state changes in OpenGL could be that you disable and then re-enable some states immediately after each other.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the bit at the end is just a sample usage not necessarily the best one. And as for start3D and end3D being restrictive I found that in my game it resulted in less opengl calls if I enabled everything right off the bat and then disabled the ones that I did in the rare case that I didn't need all of them not need for example I have a drawSkybox function which disables tangents and normals. As for my draw function do you propose that It looks like this, removing the pointers:
[CODE]
void Chunk::draw()
{
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glUniform1i(texture_location, 0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, bitmap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1);
glUniform1i(normal_texture_location, 1);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, normap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2);
glUniform1i(height_texture_loc, 2);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, heightmap);

glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tBuffer); //texcoords
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer); //positions
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nBuffer); //normals
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tanBuffer); //tangents
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, numtriangles*3);
}
[/CODE]

because I tried that and it broke the function.

BTW this code is just for the internals of my game not for a library or anything I don't really care if it makes sense but rather that it's as fast as possible.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
that draw function isn't going to work well, because you are binding 4 VBOs in a row, which means that only the last one is bound before drawing
you are drawing tangents :)
you should have kept the "pointers" to the data, and even better if you want fast rendering - interleave the data in a single VBO using a struct
http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Vertex_Specification_Best_Practices

unfortunately i have to cut my reply short, i have an exam to go to =)
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='ic0de' timestamp='1355107933' post='5008958']
the bit at the end is just a sample usage not necessarily the best one. And as for start3D and end3D being restrictive I found that in my game it resulted in less opengl calls if I enabled everything right off the bat and then disabled the ones that I did in the rare case that I didn't need all of them not need for example I have a drawSkybox function which disables tangents and normals.
[/quote]
It may work now, but it will definitely bite you later on because it's going to be a nightmare to maintain and get right, and especially get optimal as you aim for. You may very well get to the point where the disabling-and-enabling-when-done approach will cost you just as much as enabling-and-disabling-when-done approach. What you effectively end up with is a global enable state, and then local disable-on-demand calls.

You're aiming for a global optimum, so you're gonna need a global solution. For example, some state manager that doesn't re-enable things that are enabled already, or sets pointers that are already set. You can only achieve local optimum with local calls. For example, consider that you draw your sky box that, as you say, doesn't have tangents and normals, so you disable tangents and normals before drawing it, and then re-enable it again. That may be the optimum way to handle it since you only need to disable a few states.

Then you want to draw a small GUI or something that doesn't have tangents and normals either. So you do the same thing again; you disable them, draw the GUI and enable them before exiting; again, locally the optimum way to do it. But the net effect are four redundant calls; two do enabble two states and then two more to disable them again. Local optimum, but not global optimum.

[quote name='ic0de' timestamp='1355107933' post='5008958']
As for my draw function do you propose that It looks like this, removing the pointers:
[CODE]
void Chunk::draw()
{
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glUniform1i(texture_location, 0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, bitmap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1);
glUniform1i(normal_texture_location, 1);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, normap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2);
glUniform1i(height_texture_loc, 2);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, heightmap);

glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tBuffer); //texcoords
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer); //positions
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, nBuffer); //normals
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, tanBuffer); //tangents
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, numtriangles*3);
}
[/CODE]

because I tried that and it broke the function.
[/quote]
Kaptein already addressed it, but I said that the pointers in the [i]update [/i]function, not the [i]draw[/i] function, served no purpose.

[quote name='ic0de' timestamp='1355107933' post='5008958']
BTW this code is just for the internals of my game not for a library or anything I don't really care if it makes sense but rather that it's as fast as possible.
[/quote]
When your code base grows, you will forget about the details about an increasing amount of your very own code, and it will become unfamiliar to you. Design is not only for other's sake, but for your own as well.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So I put all my arrays into one and here is the resulting code:

[CODE]
void Chunk::upload()
{
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, totalsize * sizeof(float), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::draw()
{
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glUniform1i(texture_location, 0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, bitmap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1);
glUniform1i(normal_texture_location, 1);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, normap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2);
glUniform1i(height_texture_loc, 2);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, heightmap);

glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);

glVertexPointer(3, GL_FLOAT, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(v_start * sizeof(float)));
glTexCoordPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(t_start * sizeof(float)));
glNormalPointer(GL_FLOAT, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(n_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(attribPointer, 4, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(tan_start * sizeof(float)));
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, numtriangles*3);
}
[/CODE]

I works fine but the problem is that I thought I could improve performance by moving the part where I set my pointers into the upload function, however for some reason It doesn't work unless I set the pointers every time I draw. Any way I can avoid setting the pointers every draw call considering they never change? Edited by ic0de
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can use vertex array objects then. They encapsulate binding points into a single object. The problem with the pointers is that they are global (unless you're using VAO that is, in which case the are local to the VAO), so setting them in the upload function won't do any good as soon as you upload a second chunk; the pointers for the first chunk are overwritten. And not to mention that you cannot have anything other vertex array overwriting the pointers either.

Using VAO does not change the fact that you have to bind something for every single chunk every frame. You just get rid of the calls to the pointer-functions, but replace them with a bind-call instead. Edited by Brother Bob
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Using VAO's now but for some reason it isn't working here's my code:

[CODE]
void Chunk::allocate()
{
if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao);
glBindVertexArray(vao);
}
glGenBuffers(1, &vBuffer);
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(float), NULL, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glBindVertexArray(0);
}
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::upload()
{
if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glBindVertexArray(vao);
}
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);
glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, totalsize * sizeof(float), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW);
if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glVertexAttribPointer(posAttrib, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(v_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(texAttrib, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(t_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(normAttrib, 3, GL_FLOAT, true, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(n_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(tanAttrib, 4, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(tan_start * sizeof(float)));
glBindVertexArray(0);
}
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, 0);
}
[/CODE]

[CODE]
void Chunk::draw()
{
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
glUniform1i(texture_location, 0);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, bitmap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1);
glUniform1i(normal_texture_location, 1);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, normap);
glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2);
glUniform1i(height_texture_loc, 2);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, heightmap);

if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glBindVertexArray(vao);
}
else
{
glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vBuffer);
glVertexAttribPointer(posAttrib, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(v_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(texAttrib, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(t_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(normAttrib, 3, GL_FLOAT, true, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(n_start * sizeof(float)));
glVertexAttribPointer(tanAttrib, 4, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, BUFFER_OFFSET(tan_start * sizeof(float)));
}
glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, numtriangles*3);
if(GLEW_ARB_vertex_array_object)
{
glBindVertexArray(0);
}
}
[/CODE]

I have it set up so that computers that don't support the VAO extension can still render properly seeing as my target is GL 2.1. Now everything works as expected when I force the check to fail but when the check passes is when it doesn't work. Edited by ic0de
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Kaptein' timestamp='1355120569' post='5008996']
that draw function isn't going to work well, because you are binding 4 VBOs in a row, which means that only the last one is bound before drawing
you are drawing tangents
[/quote]
That is not correct. The calls to glVertexPointer() and friends work on whatever vertex buffer was active at the time of the call. After the call he is free to bind a different vertex buffer and call, for example, glNormalPointer().

However his code will leave trash bound when other objects are drawn that don’t have all of the same attributes because they are never unbound.


ic0de, you need to call glActiveTexture() before binding textures to different slots (calling glBindTexture()).
Additionally you seem to have switched to shaders but I don’t see any shaders ever being set. This has to be done before setting uniforms etc.


L. Spiro Edited by L. Spiro
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='L. Spiro' timestamp='1355203869' post='5009335']
Additionally you seem to have switched to shaders but I don’t see any shaders ever being set. This has to be done before setting uniforms etc.
[/quote]

There's allot of work being done outside the scope of this code that I posted shading is one of them, I was mainly concerned about my VBO's and that's why I didn't post the other code.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now