Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL dramatic fps drop when using transparent texture

This topic is 1857 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

[quote name='kunos' timestamp='1355419180' post='5010277']
the most likely cause is that you don't have a driver from nvidia. Go on the nvidia website, download and install your driver and enjoy hardware accelerated OpenGL.
[/quote]

Hi Kunos,
the thing is, i already have a driver from nvidia installed. And if i run code that creates rendering context for windows it runs in the gpu!! The problem has to be with choosing the right pixel format. But ill try to download latest drivers from nvidia anyway to check it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both GLUT and SDL should automatically prefer to give you a hardware accelerated pixel format if one is available.

Looking at http://sdl.beuc.net/sdl.wiki/SDL_GLattr I see that SDL_GL_SetAttribute has an SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL attribute available, so you can try using that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1355420783' post='5010289']
Looking at [url="http://sdl.beuc.net/sdl.wiki/SDL_GLattr"]http://sdl.beuc.net/...wiki/SDL_GLattr[/url] I see that SDL_GL_SetAttribute has an SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL attribute available, so you can try using that.
[/quote]

Already tried, nothing new :(. But the strangest thing is the output:

Screen BPP: 24

Vendor : Microsoft Corporation
Renderer : GDI Generic
Version : 1.1.0
Extensions : GL_WIN_swap_hint GL_EXT_bgra GL_E

SDL_GL_RED_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_GREEN_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_BLUE_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_DEPTH_SIZE: requested 24, got 32
SDL_GL_DOUBLEBUFFER: requested 1, got 1
SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL: requested 1, got 1 !!!!!!

Although it says "got 1" for SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL i dont have hardware acceleration... :S
Edited by fip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you said that lesson 1 of the nehe tutorials does give you an hardware accelerated context.

looking at the tutorial, it seems to specify 16 BPP(doesn't specify bits per color component), and a 16 bit z-buffer.

don't know if that will help, but perhaps we should step back and see why that works, but sdl does not.

i've attached a program i wrote to test your video settings, tell me if it still gives you an generic rendering context. Edited by slicer4ever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='slicer4ever' timestamp='1355434443' post='5010345']
you said that lesson 1 of the nehe tutorials does give you an hardware accelerated context.

looking at the tutorial, it seems to specify 16 BPP(doesn't specify bits per color component), and a 16 bit z-buffer.

don't know if that will help, but perhaps we should step back and see why that works, but sdl does not.
[/quote]

Yesterday i was playing a bit with the code that creates an accelerated rendering context changing the SUPPORT_OPENGL feature as well as the pixel format to PDF_FORMAT_GENERIC and i wasnt still getting HW ACCELERATION, i ll keep messing with it til i find a way to disable hardware acceleration.
That may be a way to investigate yes.

[quote name='slicer4ever' timestamp='1355434443' post='5010345']
i've attached a program i wrote to test your video settings, tell me if it still gives you an generic rendering context.
[/quote]

Thanks, I ll try it as soon as i can. Edited by fip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='slicer4ever' timestamp='1355434443' post='5010345']
i've attached a program i wrote to test your video settings, tell me if it still gives you an generic rendering context.
[/quote]

Hi slicer4ever, with your program i do get hardware acceleration!!! This program is running on my gpu.
Here is the output

VIDEO CONTEXT INFORMATION
VENDOR: NVIDIA Corporation
RENDER: GeForce GT555M/PCIe/SSE2
VERSION: 4.2.0
COLOR BITS: 32
DEPTH BITS: 24

Can you tell me what did you use to create the window? Edited by fip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok, so i've dug through sdl to figure out how it initializes the pfd, and similar things, and try these settings:
[code]
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_RED_SIZE, 0); //Changed!
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_GREEN_SIZE, 0); //Changed!
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_BLUE_SIZE, 0 ); //Changed!
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_BUFFER_SIZE, 32); //Added!
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_DEPTH_SIZE, 24 ); //Changed!
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_DOUBLEBUFFER, 1 );
if ( fsaa ) {
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_MULTISAMPLEBUFFERS, 1 );
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_MULTISAMPLESAMPLES, fsaa );
}
if ( accel ) {
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL, 1 );
}
if ( sync ) {
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_SWAP_CONTROL, 1 );
} else {
SDL_GL_SetAttribute( SDL_GL_SWAP_CONTROL, 0 );
}
if ( SDL_SetVideoMode( w, h, bpp, video_flags ) == NULL ) {
fprintf(stderr, "Couldn't set GL mode: %s\n", SDL_GetError());
SDL_Quit();
exit(1);
}
[/code]
their is one other thing i'm curiose about, after looking through the code, but let's try this first.
also, sorry about the late response. Edited by slicer4ever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,
thanks for the response.
ive made the changes you suggested and still doesnt get HW acceleration. Ive also modified the "bpp" bits per pixel parameter and set it to 0 and get the same result i get by default 8 bpp.

So nothing changed. You want me to try anything else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hmm, this is a perplexing problem, looking at sdl's source, it does a few things differently then my engine for creating a window/video context, but i don't see why this should cause you not to receive a hardware context.

i'm going to assume you are capable of compiling SDL, if not respond here and i'll see if i can't compile a binary for you with the changes.

note that i'm working with SDL-1.2.15(which a quick look at libsdl.org appears to be still the current version.)

so, my suspicion is that wglChoosePixelFormatARB is the culprit(or at least a parameter to it is causing the problem).

so let's comment out wglChoosePixelFormatARB, and use the default pixel format.
in SDL_wingl.c (src/video/wincommon/), comment lines 147-157.

this should be sufficient since it only uses the arb method if it's available for use(and i'm assuming it is available on most modern hardware), and defaults back to the regular PFD method instead.

so compile sdl, and run the test again, if this creates a hardware context, then it would appear this is the problem(or at least one of the parameter's it recieves creates a bad context). if not, i'm not really certain what the problem is, i'm no guru for sdl's internals, but by the look of things it should be similar to how i do things in my engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi slicer4ever,

I would rather prefer if u could provide me with the modified SDL library for x86 :) as im not very used to compile libraries with visual studio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alright, i've compiled the changes:

[URL]http://www.sendspace.com/file/6vjaty[/URL]

i also disabled directX since i don't have the sdk installed, and we arn't using directX, so i don't think it should be a problem.

(note the *D variants are debug versions) Edited by slicer4ever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, ive replaced SDL.lib and SDLmain.lib in release mode and this is what i get with one of the code examples:

Screen BPP: 24
Vendor : Microsoft Corporation
Renderer : GDI Generic
Version : 1.1.0
Extensions : GL_WIN_swap_hint GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_paletted_texture
SDL_GL_RED_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_GREEN_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_BLUE_SIZE: requested 8, got 8
SDL_GL_DEPTH_SIZE: requested 24, got 32
SDL_GL_DOUBLEBUFFER: requested 1, got 1
SDL_GL_ACCELERATED_VISUAL: requested 1, got 1

still no hw acceleration.....

i dont know if i should ask in the nvidia forums or rather in the dell xps forums as it's more related to my computer configuration....

Do you have any other idea? Edited by fip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it defiantly would be a good point to post in nvidia forums, i'm finding it difficult to successfully follow SDL's init pathways(so many IFDef's for different OS's/config flags =-/) from what i can tell, it's doing pretty much a 1:1(or very near anyways) with my own engine's window creation code, this is assuming that i'm following the correct config flags.

anyway, i'm going to post my window creation code(cleaned up to work as a stand-alone function):

[code]

unsigned char CreateVideoContextWindows(unsigned int BorderFlag=WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, unsigned int BorderFlagEx=WS_EX_APPWINDOW|WS_EX_WINDOWEDGE, const char *ClassName, unsigned char StencilBits, unsigned char AccumBits, unsigned char DepthBits, unsigned char ColorBits){
unsigned int PixelFormat=0;
HINSTANCE m_HInstance = GetModuleHandle(0x0);
HWND m_HWnd = 0x0;
HDC m_HDc = 0x0;
HGLRC m_HGlrc = 0x0;
int m_x = 0;
int m_y = 0;
WNDCLASS WndClass={CS_HREDRAW|CS_VREDRAW|CS_OWNDC, QWWindowsProc, 0, 0, m_HInstance, LoadIcon(0x0, IDI_WINLOGO), LoadCursor(0x0, IDC_ARROW),0x0, 0x0, ClassName};
if(!RegisterClass(&WndClass)){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'RegisterClass'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONEXCLAMATION);
return 0;
}
RECT WndRect={0, 0, m_Width, m_Height};
AdjustWindowRectEx(&WndRect, BorderFlag, 0, BorderFlagEx);
if(!(m_HWnd = CreateWindowEx(BorderFlagEx, ClassName, m_Title, WS_CLIPSIBLINGS|WS_CLIPCHILDREN|BorderFlag, m_x, m_y, WndRect.right-WndRect.left, WndRect.bottom-WndRect.top, 0x0, 0x0, m_HInstance, 0x0))){
MessageBox(0x0, "Error: 'CreateWindowEx'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd={sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), 1, PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW|PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL|PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, PFD_TYPE_RGBA, ColorBits, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, AccumBits, 0, 0, 0, 0, DepthBits, StencilBits, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
if(!(m_HDc=GetDC(m_HWnd))){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'GetDC'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
DestroyWindow(m_HWnd);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
if(!(PixelFormat=ChoosePixelFormat(m_HDc, &pfd))){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'ChoosePixelFormat'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
ReleaseDC(m_HWnd, m_HDc);
DestroyWindow(m_HWnd);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
if(!SetPixelFormat(m_HDc, PixelFormat, &pfd)){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'SetPixelFormat'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
ReleaseDC(m_HWnd, m_HDc);
DestroyWindow(m_HWnd);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
if(!(m_HGlrc=wglCreateContext(m_HDc))){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'wglCreateContext'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
ReleaseDC(m_HWnd, m_HDc);
DestroyWindow(m_HWnd);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
if(!(wglMakeCurrent(m_HDc, m_HGlrc))){
MessageBox(NULL, "Error: 'wglMakeCurrent'", "ERROR", MB_OK|MB_ICONINFORMATION);
wglDeleteContext(m_HGlrc);
ReleaseDC(m_HWnd, m_HDc);
DestroyWindow(m_HWnd);
UnregisterClass(ClassName, m_HInstance);
return 0;
}
SetForegroundWindow(m_HWnd);
SetFocus(m_HWnd);
return 1;
}
[/code] Edited by slicer4ever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As stupid as it may sound (and I may have skipped something in this thread)... did you try setting the color buffer to 32-bit instead of 24-bit? Also a 24-bit depth buffer only makes sense with an 8-bit stencil buffer if I recall correctly (both are shared making up a 32-bit buffer together).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Sik_the_hedgehog' timestamp='1355667404' post='5011266']
Also a 24-bit depth buffer only makes sense with an 8-bit stencil buffer if I recall correctly (both are shared making up a 32-bit buffer together).
[/quote]

Context creation should automatically give you 32 bit with 24 bits for depth and the remaining 8 either unused or for stencil (it's important to check this after creation as if it gives you stencil - even if you don't explicitly request it - you will want to clear stencil at the same time as depth in order to get fast clears, but that's a separate matter). Rarely it will give you 16 bit or 32 bit depth but it can happen too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1857 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now