Followers 0

# OpenGL Sampling shadow-map inside an if-statement

## 3 posts in this topic

Basically, in order to speed up shadow rendering we can check whether we are shading a pixel that faces away from the light, and in that case we can skip shadow computation (we know this pixel is in shadow).
So I implemented this. Here comes the code:
[code]
float NdotL = saturate(dot(-input.lightDirection, normal));
if (NdotL > 0.0)
{
diffuse *= NdotL;
float shadow = 0.0f;
for (int i = 0; i < SOFT_SHADOWS_SAMPLES_NUM; i++)
{
float4 texCoord = input.shadowMapTexCoord;
texCoord.xy += sunLightShadowsSoftness * poissonDiskTexCoords[i];
}
#else
#endif

output.color += shadow * diffuse;
}
[/code]

I'm using Cg and compile to D3D9 SM3.0 shaders, and OGL ARB shaders.

There is one problem however. Under D3D9 rendering is broken, giving me some random-colored flat-shaded surfaces. I would guess that hardware or the driver cannot handle texture lookups inside the if-statement but that could be a problem for a mipmapped texture. My shadow map has no mipmaps so I would expect texture lookups to work inside if-statements.
Moreover, on OpenGL everything works fine, yielding some slight performance boost when the if-statement is on.

Any ideas?
0

##### Share on other sites
Sampling where a mipmap level has to be chosen (e.g. tex2D, tex2Dproj) can't be done from within a dynamic branch; so the branch will be flattened and execute for all pixels. You'll still get the same result (so I wouldn't think this is the reason for your "random-colored flat-shaded surfaces"), but you won't get the potential performance benefit.

But since your shadow map doesn't have mipmaps, you may as well use a sampling intrinsic where you explicitly specify the mipmap level (and specify 0), such as tex2Dlod (that's in HLSL - I'm not familiar with Cg, but I assume there is something similar). That works fine in an if statement. Also, in HLSL at least, you may need to add a [dynamic] attribute to the if statement to force it to be a dynamic branch (which I think will then generate a compile error if you use tex2D or tex2Dproj in the if clause).
1

##### Share on other sites
Is output.color initialized to a default value before your if?
0

##### Share on other sites

Sorry guys for being mute so long on this subject but it completely went out of my mind.

@Hodgman: yes, it is.

@phil_t: Right. I was aware of most of the things you mentioned. I just fought that since my shadow map has only one mipmap there wouldn't be any problems with tex2Dproj. It's hard to tell for me now if using tex2Dlod could help cause, well, it's a hardware shadow map, so the only way I could get shadows is to call tex2Dproj and there is no variant of this function that would force a specific mipmap to load.

Anyway, I played a bit more with my code and found something interesting. Take a look at the code:

float NdotL = saturate(dot(-input.lightDirection, normal));

if (NdotL > 0.0)
{
diffuse *= NdotL;

output.color += shadow * diffuse;
}


And this one works! The reason is I commented out the line that shifts Z coordinates before sampling. Of course now I have some ugly acne but everything works as expected. I am aware of the fact that changing texcoords in the pixel shader allows hardware to speed up a little bit by using prefetching mechanism but I think that shouldn't affect the output of the pixel shader in such a severe way, right? Also, after all these months since I started this thread that output colors of pixels have changed from random flat-shaded colors to everything-in-snow-white.

0

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Followers 0

• ### Similar Content

• By mapra99
Hello

I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

Thanks!

• Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
• By KarimIO
EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));
• By Tchom
Hey devs!

I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.

uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
• By yahiko00
Hi,
Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
Any insight would be appreciated

• 10
• 12
• 21
• 11
• 28