• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Marscaleb

How viable do you think a 2D platformer is in today's indie market?

3 posts in this topic

I'm working on building my own game. I've been going over a number of details to make it's something I can do by myself in my spare time. I've done some tests, made some plans, and it's time for me to hit the rubber to the road.

But there is one last question I have. See, I've got two different games I want to make. One would be a side-scrolling platformer. The other would be best described as a Zelda clone. In either case I would built it with a SNES-era visual style, and it would be targeted at PC's. (Not mobile devices.)

I've been going over the pros and cons of each one, but there is still a matter that I can't quite decide on without some external help.

I am worried that the platformer might be white noise. I see so many platformers out there on the indie market, and so I begin to wonder if there is room for another one. I'm not designing something ground-breakingly innovative like Braid or Fez, just a simple love-letter to the games I grew up with like the classic Castlevania titles. Now to be fair, I don't see "that many" indie platformers that try to be Castlevania, but it still isn't terribly innovative and distinguishable. I could garner recognition for having solid gameplay and a fun experience, but I also foresee the title struggling to get anyone to take a second glace at it or care long enough to discover the solid gameplay.

The Zelda clone however sounds more original. Everybody loves Zelda, but I don't see too many people trying to steal their formula. I can see it gaining a lot of attention and people wanting to try it out, without having any original qualities. At first glance, it sounds to me like I'd make more sales with this title than a side-scroller. It probably does less to establish my prowess for creating something original, but it might make the difference between being recognized.

But in the end. this is all my own personal speculation based off of some very limited examinations of the market. And while of course, it's all speculation; no one knows what the market will be like in a couple years when I am ready to publish, and even I don't have an exact understanding of how appealing the game will be. But regardless, it is important for me to do as much research as I can. And since this research is entirely speculative, I might as well ask for the speculations of other folks, seeing how many would confirm or deny my amaturish analysis.

So I ask, all things being equal between the games I could produce, which do you think would be more successful? And by what degree?
Is there still enough room on the market that another side-scrolling platformer could be successful? Would a Zelda Clone really be something that people would want? Edited by Marscaleb
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm no expert in market forecasting, but just make whatever you are most excited about. Most games that people consider ground breaking aren't, they are just really well done. You mention Braid, a game in which nothing from a mechanics standpoint is ground-breaking or innovative. If you make a game you love to play, chances are others will love it to.

Thematic elements and art are great ways to distinguish your game if mechanics are very common. There are many games where the visuals are compelling enough to engage players when gameplay is lacking.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree with everything you said. (Except perhaps to say that Braid wasn't innovative. What, just because two other titles did a rewind thing but in a different manner?)
I do respect these thoughts, but they are also things I'm already considering. I am excited about both of these ideas, but I only have the time to pursue one. They would both have the same compelling visuals and would both be a labor of love. So really, that leaves market speculation as one of the biggest factors in splitting this decision.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The last 2D game I played was Mark of the Ninja just recently, and had a massive team on it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0