• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JulzShred

Mastering in Reason

5 posts in this topic

This is a question for all the Reason users out there. I use this program a lot for my MIDI projects, but am yet to get to grips with the mastering features. Is this the best way to go or should export a finished project in to Logic then go at it with Ozone? Let me know what you lovely people prefer and different methods you find to be effective.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The term "mastering" has evolved from preparing material for a medium to largely a corrective process, and a crude one at that. Ask yourself:

1) What are you hoping to achieve from mastering?
2) Can this achieved in the mix itself?

There's certain things that can only really achieved from processing the 2-track output (such as certain dynamics processing and dithering) but all to often people start reaching for the eq, compressor and what not because "that's what mastering is about, right?". Sure, this is what a mastering engineer would do but that's because you can only do such broad strikes with a 2-track recording but if the ME had the mix in front of him/her then you can guarantee he/she would try and correct problems at the mx level because this is nearly always the most transparent way of problem solving. The old recording adage of "don't fix it in the mix" should be updated to "don't fix it in the mastering" for the electronic age.

I guess a better question to ask you is what are your intentions with mastering, i.e. what are you hoping to achieve?
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is often said that the better the mixing, the less things you should do in mastering.

Moreover, most people do some "pre-mastering" without even realizing it since its too easy to slap a multi-band compressor/dynamic equalizer/limiter on a lot of tracks today with the kind of processing power we have.

Having so many possibilities, i think its one of the cases where less equals more.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the input guys. I guess what I'm trying to do is round the sound off with a final EQ tweak and pinch of anything else that sounds right. I try to get my instrument sounds as close to the final mix as possible during the tracking/mixing stage (I usually go back and forth between the two several times during one project). Are there any tools like Ozone available for Reason? or even Ozone itself. I don't do a lot of post-EQing, but it's nice to have the option.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I try to get my instrument sounds as close to the final mix as possible during the tracking/mixing stage.
I think that's where your problem lies. When mixing you shouldn't aim to mix just close to the final mix, your aim is a final mix, i.e. when you're done there shouldn't be anything in your mix that needs fixing that you are able to hear with your equipment (and ears). If you think something needs fixing, fix it. Only when that's done should you call your mix 'final', and that's when you send it to a mastering engineer, who has much better equipment and tons more experience than you, to critically and objectively listen to it and make sure the song sounds well on all target devices, as well as fixing any flaws you didn't or couldn't pick up on during the mix. Edited by Nyaanyaa
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly in the same boat, however I'd be inclined to say the same thing as the other members here.  When I use Reason, I have a mastering suite preset active from the beginning so I'm always mixing through that.  I quite like the one called energy for the kind of thing I've been working on lately. There was a song I was working on, and I had been paying lots of attention to mixing as I went along, and when it came to 'the mastering stage', anything I did seemed to diminish the quality, except from setting up the stereo imager.  Master eq was left flat too.  Some people may see this as bad practice, but so long as you're applying eq(everything in it's own space) as you go, there shouldn't really be much left for you to do at the mastering stage depending on how scrutinous you are with mixing.    If you're interested, this was the song I was working on https://soundcloud.com/echo-gecko

 

If this isn't acceptable sound quality, I guess I should shut up =p  To be fair, it was an extremely rushed project.  I'm normally the one asking for help, rather than giving it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0