Hi all,

I have written a chess program using bit boards in C# and almost done with move generation(Castling still incomplete).

I have also written a PERFT function which gives me the following statistics for the starting position on the chess board:

1. 20 Nodes ---> 10 ms ---> 2 kN/s
2. 400 Nodes --->11 ms ---> 36 kN/s
3. 8902 Nodes ---> 18 ms ---> 494.56 kN/s
4. 197281 Nodes --->477 ms. ---> 413.59 kN/s
5. 4865609 Nodes ---> 4372 ms ---> 1112.9 kN/s
6. 119060324 Nodes ---> 307920 ---> 386.56 kN/s

This is my very first bit-boards chess engine so don't know much about the speed, however when compared to my previous 0x88 chess stats this is definitely a winner.

When I compared these stats with Sharper (amazing chess program), I realized that it is much more faster than this, It computed Perft(6) in 132 ms without hash tables.

So I would request some one with experience in chess programming or in c# to review my code and let me know where I am going wrong or what can be done to optimize it.

I shall post my code if any one is ready to review the same.

Please note, that there are no visible bugs.

Also if any one is aware, kindly post some kind of profiling tool which will help me to understand the coding efficiency better.

I am using Visual Studio 2010 as my IDE and C# as the language.

Thanks.

Thanks alvaro for the reply,

I didnot calculate that but yes it seems impossible, however it is what my system shows.

Can you please comment on the speed my program is giving

My machine configuration is

Intel i3 core,

4.00GB RAM

2.40 GHz.

Also it would be helpful if you agree review my code, it uses nothing C# specific. (My program contains everything static even arrays and other stuff).

Getting my code reviewed from an experienced and expert like you would also help me be a better programmer.

Kindly help.

Thank you.

You can show me your code, but I can't promise I will find the time to look at it in detail. Hopefully C# is easy to read.

Hi again,

I have completed my move generation logic including the castling and promotions and have verified with the Perft Suite and found now defect in it.

Since you haven't replied back I assume that you are busy and didn't find time to review my code, however if there is any other reason like the code quality was not up to the mark or code was difficult to understand, please let me know so that I can make it the way it is easier for you to review and hence wont take much of your time.

This is a log that has been generated to give an idea how much time has been consumed in order to generate moves and so on.

http://pastebin.com/fJeFxuuh

Thanks.

I took a very brief look at it the day you posted it, and the only thing that I thought was odd is that you had code that checked the type of the captured piece by successively querying each bitboard to see if it is there. It would be better to have an array with the content of the board and keep it in parallel to the bitboard structure (see the "Hybrid Solutions" section here).

I find that semi-interpreted languages like C# make it harder to guess where the bottlenecks of performance are, and this is specially true for me, since I don't have any experience with the language.

One more thing: You can find many chess-programming experts in a more specialized forum, like this one. I point you there reluctantly, though, because a lot of the participants in that forum lack social skills and you often end up with strange wars that look more like intellectual pissing contests than legitimate attempts at helping people.