• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
P0jahn

Move towards a point algorithm

9 posts in this topic

I need a method that moves one point(this-object) to the specified coordinate, that uses integers to calculate this instead of decimals.

I have tested multiple algorithm found on the net. They all work the same and look identical ingame even if their implementation differs.
The problem is, since my game use integers as coordinates and not float, which the method found on the net use, the movespeed is not always the same. I mean, sometimes, the unit "walk" the specified speed, and sometimes it walks that specified movespeed + 1, which is unacceptable(I might sound picky, but it is noticeably ingame and can have major effect on gameplay).

I tried some things like casting and rounding but they are not helping. Here is the method.

public void moveToward(int targetX, int targetY, int steps)	//TODO:
	{
	    if(posX == targetX && posY == targetY)
	    	return;
		
	    int fX = targetX - posX;
	    int fY = targetY - posY;
	    double dist = Math.sqrt( fX*fX + fY*fY );
	    double step = (steps / dist);
	    posX += fX * step;
	    posY += fY * step;
	}
Edited by P0jahn
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Store position as float coordinates at all times and only cast to an int when rendering. Unless you want to also keep track of remainders from division and accumulate them, incrementing the position integer when it overflows... painful.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latter would be less appealing tbh. I tried to switch to floats earlier today, but there are some many function that must use integers so I ditched the plans. So... would you mind elaborating your suggestion?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use floats to store the positions but cast them to ints for those functions that need ints (and rewrite your own functions that need int coords to use float coords). That's the best way to get additional granularity, even if it's a pain in the butt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just cast the floats to an int when calling the functions then... unless they modify the position.<br /><br />Otherwise you need to look at fixed point numbers.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One option is to use fixed point integers. That is, your integers (presumably) have 32 bits, decide on how many of them should be fractional (I use 12 fractional bits for my fixed point numbers).

 

It can take a while to get to grips with, you need to be comfortable with bit-shifting, and you'll need to find or write a decent library to manipulate fixed point numbers as there's no built in support, but it's a good solution in certain circumstances. I'm using them at the moment because I have plans to add lock-step multiplayer to my RTS and I don't want to have to worry about floating point inconsistencies across different compilers, processors, optimisation settings, etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, that's what we did back in PS1 days. Every time you multiply a 12 fractional bit number by another, you need to shift down 12 bits afterwards to get the right answer. You can keep the accuracy high by storing the result & 4095 (just getting the fractional part) before shifting down, and accumulating it in another int. When it overflows to 4096, subtract 4096 from the remainder accumulator and add 1 << 12 to the fixed point value.

EDIT: This new forum update has knackered the post formatting hasn't it? I meant result logical anded with 4095 Edited by Paradigm Shifter
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused. Your function is being passed the number of steps it is supposed to take to get from A to B. You also want these steps to be integers AND of equal size?

 

Tell me, what exactly do you expect to be the result of moving a distance of 3 to the right in 2 steps, using only integers?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0