• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Liuqahs15

Is anyone else having doubts about the Raspberry Pi?

33 posts in this topic

One thing I got for Christmas was the Raspberry Pi. At this point, I wish I had put the money toward something else. The Pi Foundation claims that these machines are for kids to learn with, but I just can't see it. I'm a kid, I'm new to Linux, I'm new to working with hardware, and using the Pi thus far has been a complete pain.

 

The $35 dollar price point was a lie, much like the price of nearly any small/"portable" piece of hardware. You pretty much have to buy a case if you want this thing to last, and that's at the very least $10. Then there's the micro USB power supply which requires 5v at about 500mah. I dunno what makes anyone think that a charger like that would be laying around. I have a micro USB phone charger, but it maxes at 250mah. So that was another $10. Then there's the SD card, which ranges between 10 and 30 dollars. We'll call it $15 to be fair. Altogether that's around $70 for this "computer" that's completely painful to use from the start. And then there's the 2 weeks - 1 month or longer wait.

 

Worse, if you look at the website's main blog (http://www.raspberrypi.org/), all you see is posts highlighting projects that are utterly out of the reach of beginners, done by people with years of hardware, software and linux experience who are using the pi to do things they, for the most part, already had an idea how to do. In what way is this helpful to newcomers, other than to lure them in with projects that seem feasible? I just can't see it. I'm sure that a very tiny few people on this forum actually have a pi, but I'd love to get some feedback. Mine is pretty much sitting there. It'll be nice to have as a linux computer I can turn on and practice with through putty so I don't have dual boot over to Ubuntu, but other than that, I can't see myself using it for a while. It's not beginner friendly in the least.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5v 500mah micro USB? Isn't that the standard USB spec power output for powered ports on a PC computer, using cords that many households (at least those geeky enough to house someone wanting a Pi) would have half a dozen or more?

I have SD cards laying around, and CF cards too for that matter. This really doesn't look like something that someone without any computing experience would have any interest in, and a prior interest in computers comes with a prior collection of goodies.

It may not be simple or overly friendly, but it isn't exactly impossible to work with.

Also, aren't most of those projects fairly open? Want to do something like what someone else did? Copy them and make your improvements. Not sure how they did it? Ask. It isn't a magic device that you pull out of a box and things just happen. What kind of projects do you want them to feature and focus on? The web is full of blogs detailing simple little projects from people toying with them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have slightly biased opinions on it, but I do wish they sold kits that came with cases/power supplies/etc.

 

I don't think the intention was necessarily for kids to learn about things on their own. It seemed more to be about having a system that was simple enough for a kid to understand when being taught rather than about having a system that is easy enough for a child to use with no previous experience. We live in a world where computers are perceived increasingly as a black box inside which stuff happens rather than a series of components that work together. I think the raspberry pi succeeds in breaking that mold.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the device is for experimenting, I had mine for ages, projects in mind, build an os, slowly gathering parts for a robot (have nearly all the movement and vision, but it needs a brain.

 

I sold mine so I am able to buy the upgraded version (got a good deal, some price that I paid for it.

 

The other person wanted it for a business client, they setup solar panels at schools, and record the information down to give to the teachers to teach the students about solar panels, they wanted to use the small factor of the pi as an client to download the information from the panels and ftp it to a web server to display the results.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The $35 dollar price point was a lie, much like the price of nearly any small/"portable" piece of hardware.

I thought they were pretty clear about what the $35 gives you.

 

You pretty much have to buy a case if you want this thing to last, and that's at the very least $10.

Depends on how you treat it. If you don't abuse it you really don't need a case.

 

Then there's the micro USB power supply which requires 5v at about 500mah. I dunno what makes anyone think that a charger like that would be laying around. I have a micro USB phone charger, but it maxes at 250mah. So that was another $10.

Really? I can power it through my micro USB phone cable just fine... Besides, in USB 2.0 a unit can draw 500 mA of power just fine, at least as specified by USB 2.0 (and assuming Wikipedia isn't lying). If you just use a standard USB 2.0 connection you're fine, and I'd say most people have such a connection readily available.

 

Then there's the SD card, which ranges between 10 and 30 dollars. We'll call it $15 to be fair.

I've got spare SD cards laying around. Sure, you may not, but many people do, and if you don't you can get a dirt cheap 4GB one for under $10.

 

Altogether that's around $70 for this "computer" that's completely painful to use from the start.

I'm not sure how to say this, but if you're expecting something fancy for $70, it's not gonna happen.

 

I think people get their hopes up too high for the Pi. It wasn't ever meant to be a "here's a pretty tutorial on how to get into Linux and computer stuff;" it's more of a "here's a cheap little thing you can tinker the heck out of." Additionally, as has been mentioned, a lot of the beginners that are targeted are beginners in a classroom, with an instructor to guide them. I understand it may not have been what you expected (and maybe it was marketed to you in a less-than-ideal way), which is unfortunate.

 

I don't know what doubts I'd have about the Pi. What exactly are you doubting? Frustrations I can understand, but I'm not sure about doubts.

Edited by Cornstalks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I've had a Raspberry Pi for 6 months now. I've done some software bits and pieces and some stuff with hardware, such as temperature sensors and small LCD displays. There are lots of blogs out there for beginners. Can I suggest, to start with, looking at http://raspi.tv , especially some of the early posts, for some ideas for projects. I've got a blog at http://www.recantha.co.uk/blog that has some beginners stuff on it too.

 

If all else fails, the forum on the raspberrypi.org website is a good place to shout for help. You normally get a reply within a few hours and people are, on the whole, very friendly.

 

--

Mike

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FYI, I had multiple USB chargers around 700-1000 mAh (from an HTC Desire, amongst others), several USB Male A - Male Mini A cables and also multiple SD cards lying around, but I reckon that is just me, then :-)<br /><br />I have several/many years of experience with both Linux and programming in general, so it was certainly not hard for me to get started, but I agree that the entire experience of an RPi is more general minded than an Arduino, for instance - and this is great for guys like me who truly wanted a small, capable computer without (software) limitations. You can do pretty much whatever you want with it, especially with those GPIO's (LED Cubes is a great example), and its only limitation is the mediocre hardware (for a "normal" computer, that is). Although I am missing an interface with higher bandwidth than the current (combined SD/USB/Ethernet controller using USB 2.0 bus) for making the perfect DYI NAS :-P<br /><br />TL;DR: I agree. Beginners would probably be more productive with something like an Arduino, but intermediate users have craved this device for a long time. Edited by nife87
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can power it through my micro USB phone cable just fine... Besides, in USB 2.0 a unit can draw 500 mA of power just fine, at least as specified by USB 2.0 (and assuming Wikipedia isn't lying). If you just use a standard USB 2.0 connection you're fine, and I'd say most people have such a connection readily available.

 

I don't know what "most people" you're talking about. Are you talking about "most people who would have a need for the Pi" or are you talking about "most people" who would be interested in technology? This plays into another of the serious problems with the message of the foundation. Who is the Pi for? From the FAQ: "We want to see it being used by kids all over the world to learn programming." All over the world? Like in places where kids don't have a bunch of HDMI cables, micro USB cables and SD cards just laying around? Or even in western countries where there are, believe it or not, still people who somehow don't have those things? Worst of all, people try to pretend that stuff is easy at hand. Yeah, I guess when you live in a nice area where there's a best buy and a radio shack and another hardware store around the block. Funny, but turns out there are some places on earth that aren't like that either. I just don't like the "$35 computer" thing, when you know it costs more than $35 to use this thing.

Altogether that's around $70 for this "computer" that's completely painful to use from the start.

I'm not sure how to say this, but if you're expecting something fancy for $70, it's not gonna happen.

 

I think people get their hopes up too high for the Pi. It wasn't ever meant to be a "here's a pretty tutorial on how to get into Linux and computer stuff;" it's more of a "here's a cheap little thing you can tinker the heck out of." Additionally, as has been mentioned, a lot of the beginners that are targeted are beginners in a classroom, with an instructor to guide them. I understand it may not have been what you expected (and maybe it was marketed to you in a less-than-ideal way), which is unfortunate.

 

I don't know what doubts I'd have about the Pi. What exactly are you doubting? Frustrations I can understand, but I'm not sure about doubts.

 

From the FAQ: "We want to see it being used by kids all over the world to learn programming." From the Raspberry Pi User Guide: "A big kick up the backside came a few years ago, when we were moving quite slowly on the Raspberry Pi project. ... I was talking to a neighbour's nephew about the subjects he was taking for his GCSE. ... computer games were a passion for him, but his schooling had skirted around any programming. This is the sort of situation I want to see the back of, where potential enthusiasm is squandered to no purpose."

 

So wait, this is for kids who are enthusiastic about learning things like programming, hardware, and linux? Where are the detailed tutorials? Where's the very patient, helpful community? I think they've just gotten themselves into something they didn't understand fully. If you want to help kids get into hardware and understanding computers under all the GUI's and abstractions, then you've got a road ahead of you. Especially if most of your supported operating systems are linux-based. You're going to have to provide something the Linux/Unix community still hasn't done: A welcoming, down-to-earth community for kids and beginners, the two interests groups most likely to completely give up and go somewhere else when things get tougher than they are fun.

 

At the moment, we're talking about people who don't even know what "pwd" does, and they're asking questions like "How can I get audio over HDMI?" and being told "post your edid dump." Oh, is that all? Thanks. You think my little sister is going to put down her kindle fire to enjoy the subtle pleasantries of googling for hours to solve a problem she doesn't understand? The idea is great, but the execution is not. This isn't the way to get kids or beginners into computing.

Edited by Shaquil
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At the moment, we're talking about people who don't even know what "pwd" does, and they're asking questions like "How can I get audio over HDMI?" and being told "post your edid dump." Oh, is that all? Thanks. You think my little sister is going to put down her kindle fire to enjoy the subtle pleasantries of googling for hours to solve a problem she doesn't understand? The idea is great, but the execution is not. This isn't the way to get kids or beginners into computing.

 

What's wrong with that?

 

"post your edid dump."

"What is an edid dump and how do I get it?"

"Check this out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data"

"Oh cool I learned something new about my raspberry pi and computing in general! :D"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"post your edid dump."

"What is an edid dump and how do I get it?"

"Check this out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_display_identification_data"

"Oh cool I learned something new about my raspberry pi and computing in general! :D"

Now I may be wrong, and you can try to find it if you want, but nowhere on that page does it tell you to type tvservice -d [filename]
.

So how is it helpful, again...?

 

The most help I got on the forums was "type tvservice -d". No one told me I had to specify a file. I only realized it after a little reading, and applying what miniscule unix experience I have already. Had I seen it a month ago I'd have been like "What? It doesn't even work." Even now, I've got it writing to a file, but I've no idea how to parse or read the file. No help on that, either. If that's the best that can be done now, I'm just gonna put this thing away for a while. Thanks for the help anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I guess when you live in a nice area where there's a best buy and a radio shack and another hardware store around the block. Funny, but turns out there are some places on earth that aren't like that either. I just don't like the "$35 computer" thing, when you know it costs more than $35 to use this thing.
I also have the USB cables (at least 2) to power the thing. I don't have a smartphone, just the free (or almost free) cellphone the phone company gave me. Not everyone will have those! But many will, so why charge them extra for something they already have? I also have a MicroSD card (three, but I lost one and gave one away). I got them each for less than $10. That's just happenstance though, most people won't have them. I don't have a collection of geeky technology sitting around my desk, so the fact that I had a MicroSD card is a coincidence.

The computer part costs $35, and they are trying to get it cheaper still.
That doesn't mean it won't cost more to use the device.

Total cost to program with the Raspberry Pi:
$35 - The Pi itself
$10 - The cables
$10 - The MicroSD card
$0 - The case isn't actually needed
$350 - A monitor
$700 - A computer to code on
Reoccurring $40 monthly internet fee to access the documentation

Should they ship all this with a Raspberry Pi? No.

If their descriptions and stated goals are too enthusiastic, that's just a very small company of people who are very passionate.

Ideally, when they start having third would countries using this device, the schools will have a computer and a monitor and cables set up, and the kids will each individually only have the Pi and the MicroSD card. Hopefully, when they reach that point, the Pi and the MicroSD cards will together cost $12 or so, and will be purchased en-bulk by their government, just like India was planning on doing with the OLPC, before the OLPC was more expensive then predicted and India decided to research making $10 computers to hook up to school monitors.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main problem is that the media frenzy surrouding the Pi has resulted in some expectations in some parts of the community, which vastly exceeded anything the Pi foundation ever promised or even suggested.

 

Yes, many people need to buy additional bits - especially PSUs and leads - to use their Pi.

 

As far as $700 for "a computer to code on" - this is absolutely false - the Pi was MEANT to be a self-hosting system. If you need to cross-compile to it, then you're Doing It Wrong. That was never the intention (and it's certainly not how I use mine!)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the main problem is that the media frenzy surrouding the Pi has resulted in some expectations in some parts of the community, which vastly exceeded anything the Pi foundation ever promised or even suggested.
That's what I think whenever I see the posts "Raspberry Pi is teh aw3s0m3". Or when I look at the frequent Slashdot articles on it, which are very similar.

The Foundation as always been pretty clear about what they want: A cheap SoC that anyone can use -- which people tend to notice -- and materials focused around education and the Python programming language and tools like PyGame --- but that second part people tend to overlook.

The device can do more, certainly. And people have done quite a lot with it.

It is a cool little device, no question about that. But relative to what most people have available it is slow and clunky.

The Foundation wanted people to do cool stuff with it, but that is beyond their initial goals.

If you have a computer system and you can install PyGame on it... well then, you've got it and that's it. That's all the device was designed for.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I think whenever I see the posts "Raspberry Pi is teh aw3s0m3". Or when I look at the frequent Slashdot articles on it, which are very similar.


The Foundation as always been pretty clear about what they want: A cheap SoC that anyone can use -- which people tend to notice -- and materials focused around education and the Python programming language and tools like PyGame --- but that second part people tend to overlook.

The device can do more, certainly. And people have done quite a lot with it.

It is a cool little device, no question about that. But relative to what most people have available it is slow and clunky.

The Foundation wanted people to do cool stuff with it, but that is beyond their initial goals.

If you have a computer system and you can install PyGame on it... well then, you've got it and that's it. That's all the device was designed for.

 

No, the worst thing is that not a single person who has posted in this topic can seem to exactly agree on what the hell the Pi is for. You're right that the media has been playing things up in a different direction than what the foundation first wanted, but let's be honest: The foundation is eating it up. Like I said before, just look at their blog. For the most part, it's just hobbyist projects that are in no way beneficial to someone who doesn't know Linux, Python, or how to work with hardware. There are some things that are slightly beginner friendly, but then that's completely offset by posts like this, where they point out projects being done by grown men who admittedly have years of experience working with hardware. It plays right into that "It's a $35 computer you can do anything with!" idea. I just don't know what they're trying to do. I'm sure there's an appropriate place for them to point out stuff like that, but why the main site that everyone goes to? What is the message supposed to be?

Edited by Shaquil
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Pi is what it is... It never claimed to be more.

 

Originally the Raspberry was designed as an educational tool. To enable classes in poorer countries to get a bunch of cheap computers to teach their students. Then later the geek/nerd crowd jumped on it and hyped it up like it was... t3h l33test sh!t evar!!1

 

This is also the reason for the shipping delays. They were just not prepared for the amount of orders.

 

I really don't see the problem here. If it didn't meet your expectations you hve only yourself to blame.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your complaints don't make sense. Your post just reads like someone who went into Home Depot and bought a ton of wood, then complains that no one has told you what the wood was for. smile.png

The PI is not supposed to be "FOR" anything. It's a system on a chip, and left at that. What it's "FOR" is up to you. You have 100% freedom. If it were anything more than a system on a chip, it would be useless for it's intended purpose.

It's a system that anyone with the relevant skills can take and transform into another device without having to design their own chipset and OS.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Shaquil' timestamp='1356752887' post='5015307']
I'm a kid, I'm new to Linux, I'm new to working with hardware, and using the Pi thus far has been a complete pain.
[/quote]

 

To start with, Linux isn't easy when you're new to it. The Pi isn't making it easier, either. No one said it was going to be easy.

 

I got what I expected for $70. Bought one unit in August and played around with OpenCV and sensors/motors but it got difficult for me as I'm not used to working with anything else than Visual Studio/Eclipse. Was busy with other projects and so I lost interest a little bit and just figured I'd slap XMBC on it. Worth every penny anyway, it's $70 for crying out loud. The possibilities are there, definatly.

Will buy another one to experiment with when I get the spare time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I think whenever I see the posts "Raspberry Pi is teh aw3s0m3". Or when I look at the frequent Slashdot articles on it, which are very similar.


The Foundation as always been pretty clear about what they want: A cheap SoC that anyone can use -- which people tend to notice -- and materials focused around education and the Python programming language and tools like PyGame --- but that second part people tend to overlook.

The device can do more, certainly. And people have done quite a lot with it.

It is a cool little device, no question about that. But relative to what most people have available it is slow and clunky.

The Foundation wanted people to do cool stuff with it, but that is beyond their initial goals.

If you have a computer system and you can install PyGame on it... well then, you've got it and that's it. That's all the device was designed for.

 

No, the worst thing is that not a single person who has posted in this topic can seem to exactly agree on what the hell the Pi is for. You're right that the media has been playing things up in a different direction than what the foundation first wanted, but let's be honest: The foundation is eating it up. Like I said before, just look at their blog. For the most part, it's just hobbyist projects that are in no way beneficial to someone who doesn't know Linux, Python, or how to work with hardware. There are some things that are slightly beginner friendly, but then that's completely offset by posts like this, where they point out projects being done by grown men who admittedly have years of experience working with hardware. It plays right into that "It's a $35 computer you can do anything with!" idea. I just don't know what they're trying to do. I'm sure there's an appropriate place for them to point out stuff like that, but why the main site that everyone goes to? What is the message supposed to be?

I don't see the problem here. They have a blog where they post cool projects that people have done with the rasberry pi. Did they every say they would have tutorials on the blog? What did you expect

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your complaints don't make sense. Your post just reads like someone who went into Home Depot and bought a ton of wood, then complains that no one has told you what the wood was for. smile.png

The PI is not supposed to be "FOR" anything. It's a system on a chip, and left at that. What it's "FOR" is up to you. You have 100% freedom. If it were anything more than a system on a chip, it would be useless for it's intended purpose.

It's a system that anyone with the relevant skills can take and transform into another device without having to design their own chipset and OS.

 

I'll just repost this for emphasis. From the FAQ and User Guide.

 

From the FAQ: "We want to see it being used by kids all over the world to learn programming." From the Raspberry Pi User Guide: "A big kick up the backside came a few years ago, when we were moving quite slowly on the Raspberry Pi project. ... I was talking to a neighbour's nephew about the subjects he was taking for his GCSE. ... computer games were a passion for him, but his schooling had skirted around any programming. This is the sort of situation I want to see the back of, where potential enthusiasm is squandered to no purpose."

 

I'm sorry, but it is FOR something. There's actually a large, growing thread in the forums about this very issue. It seems I'm not the only one: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=25501

 

I'd love to have a true discussion about this, but there's nothing more boring than when someone tries to downplay my opinion or right to speak by saying that "You're not makin no sense! What you talkin bout!?" I'm done here. At least we agree on one thing: I was wrong about the Pi, its usefulness as a learning tool, and certainly its community of users.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe someone on the RPi forum said it succinctly:

"It does exactly what it says on the tin. It runs Linux or RISC OS. You can program it. You can learn how right from the lowest level. What you can't do is jump in the deep end and magically swim. You need guidance, from parents or teachers or scout leaders or books or the net. If you throw a kid in the pool you'll have drowned kids. If you let them learn with guidance you may get an Olympic swimmer. The educational material will be coming."

 

Now, of course, this "educational material" is a bit of a mythical beast at the moment, and in my opinion a lot of info has been too long coming.

 

The important questions I have for Shaquil are:

What do you want to do with the Pi? How much do you know so far? Where are you stuck?

 

If you could let us know what you're looking for, in terms of help, I know of several people from the meetup I go to who would be glad to help.

 

--

Mike

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sorry, but it is FOR something. There's actually a large, growing thread in the forums about this very issue. It seems I'm not the only one: http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=25501

Alright, so let's assume that you're right, and the Raspberry Pi fails at the task it's intended for. Does that mean that the device itself has failed? Must a device only be used for its intended purpose? I'd say definitely not.

Personally, my perception of the Raspberry Pi was that it was supposed to be a relatively cheap and nostalgic "toy" computer that was meant to evoke the days when a computer was a simple device that you plugged into a TV and programmed by hand. I highly doubt that it's meant to be "easy to use" at all, it's meant to be minimal enough (like the computers of yesteryear) that just figuring out how to use it teaches you about how computers work. I remember when I was learning to code (back in the 90s), the clunky old DOS machine I was using gave me lots of headaches just in trying to do anything more complex than moving files around. I learned a lot that way, however; I was actually solving problems that forced me to think about how the system worked and how I was going to tell the system what I wanted it to do. The Raspberry Pi seems to me like it's meant to evoke memories of a time when computers were that or even more primitive than the good old DOS 5.0 that I personally started my programming career with. A lot of people in our industry got started in an environment like that, so I'd imagine that the creators of the device figure that it would be a good way for "kids these days" to start in the 21st century. There might be problems with that approach, of course, seeing as this is the 21st century and "kids these days" are no doubt used to computer interfaces that are much easier to work with by the time they encounter the RP.
 
You called the device "painful to use." I guess my point is that if that is the complaint you're making, I'm not sure you're seeing the point that I think the creators of the device want you to see.
 
 
I'd love to have a true discussion about this, but there's nothing more boring than when someone tries to downplay my opinion or right to speak by saying that "You're not makin no sense! What you talkin bout!?"

Er, pointing out that an opinion (or an expression thereof) makes "no sense" on the face of it is a perfectly legitimate thing to do in a discussion. In a truly rational discussion, ideas which do not make sense should be shot down, in fact. Pointing out that a statement doesn't make sense gives the speaker an opportunity to revise their statement so that no misunderstanding is made; or possibly revise their opinions, if that proves useful. And I admittedly haven't read the entire thread all that closely, but where is your opinion being "downplayed" and what exactly do you mean by that? Again, contradicting another person's opinion/pointing out flaws in their argument or understanding is not "downplaying their right to speak" - it is the whole point of rational discussion in the first place. Edited by Oberon_Command
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally, my perception of the Raspberry Pi was that it was supposed to be a relatively cheap and nostalgic "toy" computer that was meant to evoke the days when a computer was a simple device that you plugged into a TV and programmed by hand. I highly doubt that it's meant to be "easy to use" at all, 

 

That is my perception as well. I can kind of see the educational value of the Pi (from an engineering point of view, anyway, for software a generic computer is probably more cost-effective) but to be honest it wouldn't be my first choice to get someone interested in computers. Nor my second, for that matter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to put this out there, and not to say people don't have their biases, but you, the op, are letting your biases become emotional. You are taking disagreements to be personal, and that's not going to result in anything beneficial for anyone tbh. You have a lot of legitimate points, but your emotions are pushing them toward extremism. It's important to be aware of when your emotions are muddying your points. If this were American political media your tone might be more apt, but here you'll find a more objective/less emotional tone is much better.

 

Not to say I've never been emotional here, but the majority of times I have I have it was either the wrong audience for it or I have regretted it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt the foundation could make it more like a, say, Rasperry iPi. However, to do so would be missing the point. It doesn't boot into the GUI, it doesn't have autoconfiguration wizards etc, work super-fancy out of the box, because it wasn't intended to.

 

Requiring the user to source their own power supply, was actually part of that, in my view (Also many different countries use a different type of power socket).

 

It's supposed to be about learning, not having things premade. If you want something pre-made, go buy an iPad mini.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0