Sign in to follow this  
Spck

OpenGL Adding/Removing from VBO at runtime

Recommended Posts

Spck    105

I'm new to Modern OpenGL and have been following a handful of tutorials online. I'd appreciate some clarification on a few things so my head doesn't explode. None of the tutorials speak of adding/removing data from VBOs once the buffer has already been filled. I could really use some assistance.

 

 

So let's say I have 2 objects, each with vertex data loaded into a single VBO as

 

[x, y, z, w,

 r, g, b, a,

 x, y, z, w,

 etc]

 

What's the best practice to adding another object to the VBO? Copy the original VBO into a larger array, add the new vertex data, then bind the larger array as the VBO?

 

Also, how would I go about removing objects (all of their vertex data)? Destroy the VBO and create a new one? (Removing particular parts of the VBO is beyond me.)

 

As you can tell, I don't quite have a grasp on the concept. If someone could point me in the right direction I'd very much appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344

It seems like you're talking about whole objects, so why not keep the objects in their own buffer objects instead of all of them sharing one big buffer object? Then you don't have to manage one big buffer, but just manage many smaller ones so the other objects aren't affected when you add or remove other objects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spck    105

I was originally thinking just that, but I'm making a simple 2D game and only using textured quads. Everything I've been reading has basically stated it's considerably more efficient to stick them into one VBO instead of many.

 

Also, I feel like I'm missing something important here. If I have 2 objects, both exact copies except for position, is there a simpler way to render them besides passing the data twice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
santa01    307

[quote name='Spck' timestamp='1356778009' post='5015391']
If I have 2 objects, both exact copies except for position, is there a simpler way to render them besides passing the data twice?
[/quote]

You can pass a translation matrix as a uniform variable to a shader and render one object twice with different matrices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spck    105

If I have 2 objects, both exact copies except for position, is there a simpler way to render them besides passing the data twice?

 

You can pass a translation matrix as a uniform variable to a shader and render one object twice with different matrices.

 

Just to clarify, since I'm horribly new to graphics programming. Hypothetically, if I wanted 10,000 2D right triangles all with the same texture coordinates, I would only need 1 set of data in the VBO? (edit)

 

Could you explain how this would differ if I had multiple different shapes/textures? 

2 2D shapes + same texture = 2 sets of data?

2 2D shapes + 2 textures = 4 sets of data?

3 2D shapes + 2 textures = 6 sets of data?

 

Really having a tough time wrapping my head around, thanks for the help.

Edited by Spck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344

If by "object" you mean just a single quad, then you may prefer a single buffer object. I would definitely not create and recreate the buffer object, but try to manage the memory within it instead.

 

For example, make a buffer object large enough to hold all objects, or at least quite a few of them, and then fill it with as many objects as you need to begin with. After that, just add more objects to the end, or remove objects either by shifting the buffer or by swapping in the last object to the deleted position. if you add more objects than can be stored in the buffer object, then create a new, larger buffer, copy everything to it, and continue using the larger one instead. By memory mapping the buffer object, you get "direct access" to it as if it was a regular pointer and memory buffer and you can manipulate your buffer's memory as you like.

 

You could also use different buffer objects for sprites with different usage patterns. For example, a buffer object for static sprites that doesn't change, a buffer object for sprites that change but are always there, and a buffer object for dynamic sprites that are created and deleted in the fly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
santa01    307
Just to clarify, since I'm horribly new to graphics programming. Hypothetically, if I wanted 10,000 2D right triangles all with the same texture coordinates, I would only need 1 set of data in the VBO? (edit)

 

Until you don't need to update the geometry of one single triangle, you don't need 10.000 VBOs to store them (JFI: you can take advantage of glDrawElementsInstanced()).

 

Could you explain how this would differ if I had multiple different shapes/textures? 

2 2D shapes + same texture = 2 sets of data?

2 2D shapes + 2 textures = 4 sets of data?

3 2D shapes + 2 textures = 6 sets of data?

 

not sure what you mean under the `data set' here:

in the first (1) variant you can bind texture once for use with both shapes

in the second variant I think you want to have two shapes with their own textures? in this case you would bind texture object 1 + render vbo 1, than bind texture object 2 + render vbo 2

in the third variant I am not sure what you want to achieve, but you certainly can do as in (1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spck    105

Thanks, everything's more clear now. I've been looking around and haven't been able to find any examples of managing the memory inside the VBO. Does anyone know any source I could look at to get a better understanding of the subject?

 

EDIT - I feel like I should explain what I'm trying to do. I'm making a simple 2D game. There might be maybe 100 quads on screen at one time, and there will only be one large texture made of mutliple .pngs. If I wanted to add a game object at run time, I'd need to add a rendering component containing the vertex data (position and texture coords).

 

Would it be best to just add/delete each game object as a new VBO? Or should I used the memory managament method Bob described with a single VBO?

 

 

I'm attempting to write code that code be the basis for further development, so I'm trying not to use any bad practices. This is purely for education purposes as I find programming, and specifically graphics programming to be incredibly fascinating.

Edited by Spck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
santa01    307

I've been looking around and haven't been able to find any examples of managing the memory inside the VBO.

 

glBufferSubData() to update the contents of VBO

glBufferData() to reallocate and init VBO

 

If you already have some knowledge open opengl you can look through the opengl wiki:

http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Buffer_Object

http://www.opengl.org/wiki/VBO#Vertex_Buffer_Object

 

Would it be best to just add/delete each game object as a new VBO? Or should I used the memory managament method Bob described with a single VBO?

 

Its up to you, try both options, pick what fits your needs best.

 

This is purely for education purposes as I find programming, and specifically graphics programming to be incredibly fascinating.

 

Then _definitely_ try both options :) Early optimization isn't vital, moreover its usually harmful. Make a working prototype first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mhagain    13430
Then _definitely_ try both options smile.png Early optimization isn't vital, moreover its usually harmful. Make a working prototype first.

 

I'd disagree with your "early optimization" comment here - getting buffer object updates correct is not "early optimization" - it's a fundamental requirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now