• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Unity Creating a cross-platform C++ engine, incl. android and IOS

This topic is 1811 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

forgive me for posting about a topic that has probably been discussed several times; I do feel that my question has a few extra points though and I have done a couple of days of reading on the matter.

 

I started writing a game engine in C++ with Ogre3D, SDL and Bullet physics. I have got 70% of a game done with it but it was just not written very well with some fundamental issues so I am starting again with those lessons learned. One of the reasons I am so keen on using C++ is that I am trying to better myself in C++ (since that is what my career is based around).

 

This time I also want to consider how I can code the engine in the best way possible to be able to 'port' it to android and IOS (as well as supporting Windows/linux/mac) since I realised the current engine I have it would be near impossible to do. I have done a lot of reading about the android NDK and Objective-C but I'm still not really sure.

 

I do understand that on any platform there will always be specifics that will need to be written for that platform regardless (I think I read that I'd have to code the UI myself for android at least) but I'd like to avoid rewriting code as much as possible.

 

Ideally I would like to avoid tools like Unity as that is C# and costs a fair bit of money for licensing extra platforms which I just don't have at the moment. I also want the experience of writing more of the engine than a tool like Unity will allow (even if it is just piecing a few pieces of middleware together).

 

Will it just be easier to write 3 separate engines? One for PC/Mac/Linux and one for each mobile platform? Should I try and brush up on plain old OpenGL and OpenGL ES 2.0 for phones.

 

Am I trying to do too much for a one man job?

 

I'd be glad of any thoughts any of you have on this matter.

 

Thanks for reading,

Nixius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
Being a systems programmer for one platform is hard. Doing it for multiple platforms would be a good learning experience but it would be improbable to become expert at all of them at once without many years of experience.

You will likely come up with a set of multi-platform common code using per-device abstractions.

If that is your passion then go for it. I don't know too many people who have that passion once they understand what it really means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

Hmmm... you are probably right there, maybe I am biting off far more than I can chew at my current level and for a project on my own.

 

Perhaps then, I will initially concentrate on a PC/Mac/Linux engine and get proficient at that, populating the engine's functionality with a few games and then try my hand at a mobile platform completely separately.

 

Once I feel I have mastered those, perhaps then I may be in a better position to tackle something like I initially proposed.

 

Do you think that sounds like a more plausible approach?

 

It just irks me that I will be starting something I know I will probably have to rewrite, perhaps that is just something I will have to swallow; at least for now.

 

Nixius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont want to write 3 separate engines.  Write a single engine and put as much functionality as you can into platform-independent code.  Current mobile platforms are similar enough to the others (PC/Mac/Linux) that this should be a doable objective if you're writing in C++.

 

With each platform the parts that will mostly have to be platform-dependent will be the setup code, UI, and graphics.  If you're using OpenGL then you can get most of the graphics code to work on all those platforms.  Just make sure you still make the wrapper layer platform-independent so you can easily add new platforms later (like DirectX for Xbox, etc).  

 

As far as the setup code, just make sure you only do as little as needed to get the app up and running, then hand off the updating, rendering, input handling to the platform-independent code.

 

For UI, if you have your own UI system, then it's not a problem.  If you use each platforms native solution (Interface Builder in iOS, etc), then you do need to rewrite that for each one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, you will need a platform abstraction that will allow you to code your game without worrying about the environment (PC/Mac/Android/etc...) ; then you will need to implement your platform abstraction for any supported environment.

 

If I'm not wrong, iOS does not support C++, so you will not be able to get a "write once, run every where" system (at least, it will not run on iOS).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, you will need a platform abstraction that will allow you to code your game without worrying about the environment (PC/Mac/Android/etc...) ; then you will need to implement your platform abstraction for any supported environment.

 

If I'm not wrong, iOS does not support C++, so you will not be able to get a "write once, run every where" system (at least, it will not run on iOS).

You're wrong. You do need an Objective C layer, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1811 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By 3dmodelerguy
      So I am building a turn based rogue-like (think CDDA). The game is going to have a very large map (up to 1000's x 1000's) however to alleviate most of that I obviously can't render everything so there will just be render a certain radius around the player and just load in and out data as the player moves.
      The next major system I am prototyping is making interactive tiles destructible and pretty much everything will be destructible besides basic landscape (cars, doors, windows, structures, etc. will be destructible)
      While I am only rendering a certain amount of tiles around the player, I want to keep the amount of colliders active at one time to be as small as possible for performance and currently the tilemap tool I use automatically merges colliders together.
      So instead of creating a separate colliders for each of these tiles and having the destructible behavior tied to that object (which my tilemap tool would allow me to do) I was thinking that I would store an array of all the X and Y locations for the interactive tilemap layer and let the tilemap manage the colliders. 
      Then when I hit a collider on the interactive tilemap layer, instead of of getting the behavior for how to deal with the destruction for that tile from that game object, I would pull it from the array I mentioned earlier based on the tile I attempt to interact with which I already have.
      Does this sound like a good approach? Any other recommendations would be welcomed.
    • By NDraskovic
      Hey guys,
      I have a really weird problem. I'm trying to get some data from a REST service. I'm using the following code:
       
      private void GetTheScores() { UnityWebRequest GetCommand = UnityWebRequest.Get(url); UnityWebRequestAsyncOperation operation = GetCommand.SendWebRequest(); if (!operation.webRequest.isNetworkError) { ResultsContainer rez = JsonUtility.FromJson<ResultsContainer>(operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text); Debug.Log("Text: " + operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text); } } The problem is that when I'm in Unity's editor, the request doesn't return anything (operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text is empty, the Debug.Log command just prints "Text: "), but when I enter the debug mode and insert a breakpoint on that line, then it returns the text properly. Does anyone have an idea why is this happening?
      The real problem I'm trying to solve is that when I receive the text, I can't get the data from the JSON. The markup is really simple:
      [{"id":1,"name":"Player1"},{"id":2,"name":"Player2"}] and I have an object that should accept that data:
      [System.Serializable] public class ResultScript { public int id; public string name; } There is also a class that should accept the array of these objects (which the JSON is returning):
      [System.Serializable] public class ResultsContainer { public ResultScript[] results; } But when I run the code (in the debug mode, to get any result) I get an error: ArgumentException: JSON must represent an object type. I've googled it but none of the proposed solutions work for me.
      Also (regardless if I'm in the debug mode or not) when I try to do some string operations like removing or adding characters to the GET result, the functions return an empty string as a result
      Can you help me with any of these problems?
      Thank you
    • By nihitori
      The Emotional Music Vol. I pack focuses on beautiful and esoteric orchestral music, capable of creating truly emotive and intimate moods. It features detailed chamber strings, cello and piano as the main instruments, resulting in a subtle and elegant sound never before heard in video game royalty-free music assets.

      The pack includes 5 original tracks, as well as a total of 47 loops based on these tracks (long loops for simple use and short loops for custom / complex music layering).

      Unity Asset Store link: https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/107032
      Unreal Engine Marketplace link: https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/emotional-music-vol-i

      A 15 seconds preview of each main track is available on Soundcloud:
       
    • By RoKabium Games
      Another one of our new UI for #screenshotsaturday. This is the inventory screen for showing what animal fossils you have collected so far. #gamedev #indiedev #sama
    • By eldwin11929
      We're looking for programmers for our project.
      Our project is being made in Unity
      Requirements:
      -Skills in Unity
      -C#
      -Javascript
      -Node.js
      We're looking for programmers who can perform a variety of functions on our project.
      Project is a top-down hack-and-slash pvp dungeon-crawler like game. Game is entirely multiplayer based, using randomized dungeons, and a unique combat system with emphasis on gameplay.
      We have a GDD to work off of, and a Lead Programmer you would work under.
      Assignments may include:
      -Creating new scripts of varying degrees specific to the project (mostly server-side, but sometimes client-side)
      -Assembling already created monsters/characters with existing or non-existing code.
      -Creating VFX
      -Assembling already created environment models
      If interested, please contact: eldwin11929@yahoo.com
      This project is unpaid, but with royalties.
       
      ---
      Additional Project Info:
      Summary:
      Bassetune Reapers is a Player-verus-Player, competitive dungeon crawler. This basically takes on aspects of dungeon crawling, but with a more aggressive setting. Players will have the option to play as the "dungeon-crawlers" (called the 'Knights', or "Knight Class", in-game) or as the "dungeon" itself (literally called the 'Bosses', or "Boss Class", in-game). What this means is that players can choose to play as the people invading the dungeon, or as the dungeon-holders themselves.
      Key Features:
      -Intense, fast-paced combat
      -Multiple skills, weapons, and ways to play the game
      -Tons of different Bosses, Minibosses, creatures and traps to utilize throughout the dungeon
      -Multiple unique environments
      -Interesting, detailed lore behind both the game and world
      -Intricate RPG system
      -Ladder and ranking system
      -Lots of customization for both classes s of customization for both classes
  • Advertisement