• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Legendre

Idea for non-collectible card game that is still collectible.

9 posts in this topic

Would it be feasible to make a CCG that caters to both the competitive-non-collectible crowd and the collectible crowd at the same time using this method:
 
1) An entire tournament viable set can be bought for say US$30.
2) Players can still choose to buy boosters, which contains foil/alternate-art/premium cards.
 
So anyone who don't card about collectibility can just pay US$30 up front and have access to all the cards of the game. But collectors can still chase the foil or expanded art mythic rare by opening boosters.
 
Is this a good idea? Are there examples of this being done before that I can study?
 
*We focus on constructed formats in this discussion and ignore draft/limited formats.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would end up flooding the market with secondary cards that are discards from the 'collectors' and your $30 main pack would end up looking really over priced. To prevent this the boosters would need to contain cards not found in the main pack.

I think it would be a hard thing to sell, considering the 'collectible' cards in a normal CCG are collectible because of their power, not because of the rarity or artwork (though rarity is a side effect built into the design).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you would end up flooding the market with secondary cards that are discards from the 'collectors' and your $30 main pack would end up looking really over priced. To prevent this the boosters would need to contain cards not found in the main pack.


That a good point. In Magic: the Gathering, a lot of common, uncommon and junk rares come in bulk for cheap. Perhaps there could be a US$20 set of rares and ultra-rare cards, and a separate US$10 set of commons and uncommons?

CCG distribution is hard... >___<

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

some deck-building will be preferred too, if the cards are reasonably balanced people wont feel like they either have to invest a lot in different cards or get a preconstructed deck

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the Full-Decks, you could have a random selection of cards that are foil, then they get the full action, but only a few random foils ones.  But as soon as you introduce rare cards, I.e. not in the full deck, then people will still build decks using rares.

 

Perhaps you could make the rare card part of a separate mechanic, where there could only be one rare card in play from a player, and it altars the effect of cards they play or someone else plays.  Then every one uses the standard deck, plus this one extra card to define the game play method.  every full deck includes two of these at random, but then other decks can be bought, that only have these special cards.  The problem with MTG, is the huge number of lands, along with lower value cards, when buying bulk cards.  This would just be mechanic cards.  This could become even more interesting with 3 or more players as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CCG is also copy written by wizards of the coast, so technically you'd have to pay them royalties as well.  I don't know what the cost is, but you'll want to keep that in mind with the distribution issues.

 

http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&Query=%22Wizards+of+The+Coast%22

 

Thanks for bringing this up.

 

The key part of the patent is the mechanics (turning cards sideways - "tapping"). Discussions and cases over the years suggests no infringement as long as we have sufficiently different mechanics, especially avoiding turning cards sideways to "tap" them.

 

Also, I spoke to a patent lawyer and was told that patents aren't as legit/strong as copyrights or trademark. Obvious copyright/trademark infringements is almost certainly a loss. But outcomes for even obvious patent infringements is often unknown. Having a patent does not mean it will automatically hold up in court, unlike copyrights and trademarks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
some deck-building will be preferred too, if the cards are reasonably balanced people wont feel like they either have to invest a lot in different cards or get a preconstructed deck

 

This is exactly the same as the Magic: the Gathering model: you have card sets from which you can build decks. You can buy booster packs containing random cards.

 

The only difference is that you can buy a full tournament playset of every card in a set for US$20-30 (say 4 of each card). You still have to build a deck from these cards.

 

There are no preconstructed decks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a precon is a must, you cannot expect a (potential!!) player to both grasp the deckbuilding and playing the deck in one go, not to mention that even veteran players sometimes just want to play a game without any hassle

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

powerneg, on 27 Jan 2013 - 21:49, said:
a precon is a must, you cannot expect a (potential!!) player to both grasp the deckbuilding and playing the deck in one go, not to mention that even veteran players sometimes just want to play a game without any hassle

+1. That is a good point. Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0