• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hpdvs2

MMO RTS, what if blown up stuff didn't disappear?

13 posts in this topic

I'm working on an MMO RTS, that I imagine will have things like tanks.  And weapons like EMP's.  EMP's don't blow stuff up, they just cripple electrical equipment.  So what if you had a large group of tanks approaching and crippled only the first wave with an EMP.  the other tanks typically can't just ride over the first tanks.  But in Star Craft and most others, the just disappear   

 

It makes sense from a processing sense, as ever bit of shrapnel takes a toll on performance.  (I have ideas on how to make that better in certain areas)  I like the idea of being able to take a disabled tank, rehabilitate it, and use it for your side.  Or even take a disabled tank and learn its technologies.  

 

What ideas do you guys have for left behind shrapnel?  Handling it, clearing it, etc... 

 

 

I'm not as interested in the programming of it, but more in the application of it to the player.  What would it mean to you, what complications and advantages could be used?  would it be annoying to deal with and are their ways around the annoyances?

 

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Metal Fatigue. In that game, you make big giant robot mechs, each made up of Torso, Head, Arms, and Legs. When a robot is destroyed, those pieces scatter on the battlefield. Another mech could come and grab the arms and utilize them right away (Laser Sword arm, homing missiles launcher arm, etc.). Other pieces need to be brought back to base, researched, reverse-engineered, then you can use enemy's technology against them. AWESOME game. TRY IT.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if this is exactly an answer, but CnC Generals had something like that. The GLA faction had a hero unit Jarmen Kell who had a snipe ability, which would render any vehicle unit neutral, and which would then be captureable by sending any infantry unit into the vehicle. And you could theoretically have an infinite number of neutral vehicles, although it was rarely so, since players would try getting those vehicles for themselves as fast as they could :)

 

Also, the game Universe At War had a similair principle, as every mechanical unit destroyed on the battlefield was then salvagable for resources.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Cyberdogs7' timestamp='1357504034' post='5018296']
Units would leave behind block scrap heaps, which could be harvested back (for metal, one of the 2 resources). 
[/quote]

 

Excellent idea.  I like the idea of recycling for raw materials, or, if you know how to use it, there is potential for parts to be salvaged as well.  

 

[quote name='Cyberdogs7' timestamp='1357504034' post='5018296']
With additional fire, the scrap heaps would crumble, clearing the way, but also reducing the salvage value.
[/quote]

 

Also a good idea.  Scrap heaps or disabled vehicles could be blown up with rockets/tanks, etc... to get them out of the way.  or, prevent capture for studying the techs.

 

[quote name='PyrZern' timestamp='1357523564' post='5018389']
When a robot is destroyed, those pieces scatter on the battlefield. Another mech could come and grab the arms and utilize them right away (Laser Sword arm, homing missiles launcher arm, etc.). Other pieces need to be brought back to base, researched, reverse-engineered, then you can use enemy's technology against them.
[/quote]

 

I definitely like the idea of usable parts.  For instance perhaps tanks and other vehicles have optional weapon bays, which you can pay to have something their, or upgrade these ports.    That would be quite nice that a tank, if their mechanic has the skills, could collect and attach these additional features.

 

[quote name='Strewya' timestamp='1357546069' post='5018505']

Don't know if this is exactly an answer, but CnC Generals had something like that. The GLA faction had a hero unit Jarmen Kell who had a snipe ability, which would render any vehicle unit neutral, and which would then be captureable by sending any infantry unit into the vehicle. And you could theoretically have an infinite number of neutral vehicles, although it was rarely so, since players would try getting those vehicles for themselves as fast as they could
[/quote]

 

This is good, having weapons or troops with skills to disable instead of destroy.  like turrets for instance, not just vehicles.  as this would allow you to take over a turret at the edge of an enemy base, using their own weapons against them.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just make sure those abilities aren't too spammable, because it can get really annoying for the guy it's being used on.

always think about the guy on the receiving end when designing abilities :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the single player RTS  I' m currently working on the debris of destroyed units stays on the map until level completion  I think its makes for more realistic enviroment for the player.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not only much more realistic, but also interesting from a strategic point of view.

 

Having an EMP cannon would be not only a means of destroying some units (all units that have un-fortified electronics), but it also lends as a kind of improvised Czech hedgehog (debris blocking the way), and finally the enemy delivers resources right to your doorstep. Three for the price of one -- that's almost as good as Kinder Surprise :-)

 

Of course you would need to have fortified tanks or tanks without electric circuits, too. Otherwise using anything except EMP would be utterly pointless.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Strewya' timestamp='1357566894' post='5018582']
just make sure those abilities aren't too spammable, because it can get really annoying for the guy it's being used on.
always think about the guy on the receiving end when designing abilities
[/quote]

 

That's a good point.  I would need to make it easier to take out than to take over, and make it a feature that turrets can upgrade, to first focus on approaching sabatours, or have a self destruct mechanism on take over.  Or even have a trap where if a turret is taken over, its weapons silently switch to healing rays, or shield buffers, so when its shooting your troops/machines, its a good thing.  *perhaps* being the operative word. I agree that this could be an annoying mechanic, and will certainly need consideration on how it works and remains balanced.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this disabled, immobilized or destroyed permanent wreck system combined with Company of Heroes cover system could make the wreck of a defeated tank column into the covered approach of an infantry platoon. could be a lot of fun. Lighter vehicles could act like red barrels, being an explosive target for someone fighting someone foolish enough to use it as cover.

 

To save on data the library of instanced map objects could have a dynamic portion that allows dead units to be added and subtracted (if destroyed or salvaged) from it making the rules of the map's instanced objects apply to it. Maybe create a texture set that can be carried over to any wreck and corpse, the dead unit could then be replaced with the identical instanced map object and the instanced texture data, making the dynamic object into a static part of the map and level design.

 

This could be especially impressive with huge ships in low orbit crashing into the surface. Becoming a whole new part of the map and dynamic addition to the game since every time it crashed it would be different.

Edited by Mratthew
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There could definitely be a lot of uses for such a system:

 

 

If wreckage can get in the way, you might choose to try to take out a unit in a choke point to disrupt movement.

If wreckage can provide cover you might position your units so that larger units can provide cover for smaller ones.  You might use the wreckage of an enemy unit as cover.  You might choose to move one of your units in an otherwise unintelligent way or fire upon one of your own units to prevent enemies from using it for cover.

 

If units have morale, you might have to ensure that weaker units avoid the wreckage from previous battles so they aren't lost.  You might ensure your units pass by the wreckage of enemy units to improve their morale.

 

If equipment can be salvaged from wreckage, or if you can gain resources from it then wreckage can potentially be valuable.

 

 

It's something that's been done before in numerous forms, but I think it's certainly worthy of consideration. smile.png

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This could be especially impressive with huge ships in low orbit crashing into the surface. Becoming a whole new part of the map and dynamic addition to the game since every time it crashed it would be different.

 

 

This could be an interesting effect.  Asteroids/starships that crash to earth on occasion.  There certainly are chances this *could* happen over an existing base, in the middle of a battle or next to some event.  I'm thinking to maintain fun, it should destroy much.    Unless perhaps there is value in it as an attack.  Perhaps for some reason bombs can't drop from space.  but ships can.  Perhaps a colony can decide to sacrifice a transport ship to crash over an advancing enemy force.  The bigger the ship, the more valueble it is, so this is more of a last ditch effort.  

 

 

If units have morale, you might have to ensure that weaker units avoid the wreckage from previous battles so they aren't lost.  You might ensure your units pass by the wreckage of enemy units to improve their morale

 

 

Good call. I think that's quite reasonable to have an effect on non-veteran status soldiers

 

 - - - - - - - - - - 

 

This gave me an idea for non-mathematical combat.  You can tell if your troops are disheartened or emboldened, but not the enemy, and Vise Versa.  This gives an element to throw off calculations.  Typically you would not want to send a force into battle that was disheartened, if their ability was reduced.  Of course this could also mean that a soldier's drive is increased if their early experiences are positive, not just survived.  Perhaps when these soldiers go through additional training, they (or some of them) might graduate early and be ready for more battle sooner.    

Edited by hpdvs2
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could also burn for a while, creating a visual obstacle to your FoW.

 

If there is a large battle with tons of units getting destroyed, it would probably be hard for you to see minor enemy activity in the middle of it all, or lets say enemy aircraft flying through the smoke clouds.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Waterlimon' timestamp='1357652896' post='5019031']
They could also burn for a while, creating a visual obstacle to your FoW.
[/quote]

 

 I like that.  I had been imagining more along the lines of Blown Apart, but set on fire is good too, and both is better.  Then you could also create incendiary weapons, and set a path on fire.  It can be put out with a short amount of time, or an agent specifically for stopping the fire.  But that would also set traps to separate troops out, by having preset fire lines.  anyone directly over it, too bad for them, and then with individuals in between the fires, they are sitting ducks.  Easy targets, unless they run through a wall of fire taking serious damage.

 

Also, fire could have a range damage while it is going.  if are in it, it is terrible.  right next to it, depending on the size, it hurts a little to a lot. and a space or two away and your fine.  Also, the idea that fire can spread seems like another usable map feature.  Flammability of buildings and map features like trees.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name='Waterlimon' timestamp='1357652896' post='5019031']
hard for you to see minor enemy activity in the middle of it all, or lets say enemy aircraft flying through the smoke clouds
[/quote]

 

Smoke is another good aspect of fires.  allowing low/no satellite vision.  I also like the idea of deploying satellites for visibility.  you can always see but only in a limited spot, even if you have no troops on the ground in that area.  you can deploy multiple satellites, but they cost a lot.

 

But smoke, can hide forces.  Also, adding natural fog, not FoW, but fog literally   Just happens.  But can also be artificial, though the wind will be random.  once its in your favor, start fog machines, then send in troops under its cover.  Satellites can see you, but ground units probably won't.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0