• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Hypnotron

Video Games Cause Kids to SNAP!

32 posts in this topic

@Hypnotron

 

What exactly is the point of this discussion? noatom said practically the same thing I did.

 

Also this thing

 

 

The reason parents are not held responsible is because it would be the first chink in the armor of the "personal responsibility" doctrine

 

You do remember that until the person turns adult 18-21 years old parent has the final say. Of course when the person turns 13, 16 or 18 parent is not exactly in same position as earlier, but still responsible. And then we have the other issue which is piracy, where anyone can get unsitable content illegally and for free, and also in this case user or his parent is responsible for doing this.

 

There wasn't single case of someone going crazy because he played a violent video game, ever.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are 10 and you steal a toy parent has final say? I don't know what that means.

 

I'm saying the child is still the one who is going to get in trouble with the law.  Not the parent.  In the U.S.A at least, the child will be charged with the crime and face legal punishment. 

 

My point about the "personal liability doctrine" is regarding this robotic mantra we site about "personal responsibility."  If suddently we start sending parents to jail for crimes committed by their children, you throw that doctrine out the window.  That wont ever happen because of the political dogma we preach.  Do a mental exercise and consider what starts to unravel there if you start charging the parents.  Parents that are both working just to provide basic necessities.  Parents that say "Why am I responsible?  I see my kid one hour before school and one hour before bed!"  Everyone else has more influence on my kid than I do!  If these parents are still ultimately responsible for their childs actions then it's for no logical basis other than they are the legal guardians. 


What other reasonable basis is there? 

 

My position is that all of society must be responsible for the welfare of the children being raised in it.  This includes media producers.  And to be clear (and to reitterate for the xth time) I'm not just talking about video game violence.  I'm talking about media in general.  I'm not talking about violence either.  I'm talking generally about virtues and vices that children pick up. 

Edited by Hypnotron
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2) Games are no different from all other forms of media
Then shut up about games and start talking about other forms of media. Those with a greater impact on behavioral science would be a good start.

Who do you think you are anyway? Joe Biden?
Coming onto a site about developing games and talking this nonsense. It’s our business and obviously not yours. We know what we are doing. It is what we do all day every day.

People such as yourself come and go but are nothing but a nuisance. As a human you seem to think you have a point to make. You have made some opinion over time and now you think you need to share it, as if that is going to make the universe acknowledge your existence.
Your opinion has been acknowledged, bottled, and set aside. Now shoosh. Move along. We have games to make.

I hope it is not your goal to tell your grandchildren about how the only thing you ever accomplished was to annoy a small handful of game developers, because unless you get a clue that is where you are headed.


L. Spiro Edited by L. Spiro
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you are 10 and you steal a toy parent has final say? I don't know what that means.

Parent is responsible for teaching you to not do these thing and to be nice to others and say 'thank you', etc, etc. Anywhere in the world you will get in trouble for stealing.

 

 

 

 Parents that say "Why am I responsible?  I see my kid one hour before school and one hour before bed!"

These are idiotic parents that are the root of todays problem. Parents are ALWAYS responsible for their kids actions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of the more ridiculous posts I've ever seen, ever.

 

You're using your own personal experiences to draw conclusions that are asinine, and then anyone who responds to you using their own personal experiences, you instantly switch positions that "personal experience doesn't matter, it just reinforces your opinion." You also go on with some ridiculous claims like (paraphrased) "putting a gun in a kids hand in a video game is the same as them having a real gun, because it sounds and looks the same." (also as a side note, you claimed that a child would be responsible for stealing a toy in the US, which is actually flat out wrong - any crimes committed by a child require restitution by the parent or guardian, however at the 18th birthday the parent/guardian can petition the state/county/city/federal court to shift the fiscal responsibility to the adult, now that they've legally reached adulthood.)

 

First, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've never been forced into a position where you had to actually shoot someone, so your logic here is pretty disrespectful to those who have. Taking another persons life, in reality (not in video games, movies, tv shows, cartoons, et cetera), is a MAJOR thing. Why do you think that even those who've been professionally trained to the best of their countries ability (any country) still suffer from PTSD from real life combat? If it's so real, shouldn't people playing video games, watching movies, and consuming the media you're chastising experience PTSD at an equal rate? If so, half our population would be catatonic from games like BF3/Halo/COD and movies like Saving Private Ryan or Kill Bill or basically anything where anyone kills someone.

 

Second, let's go ahead and agree that mass media in general (this includes all forms, including videogames) is in a pretty sad state. It's easy to see when shows like Jersey Shore are popular, or the long-lasting decline of the Discovery/TLC/History channels (Honey Boo Boo deson't belong on the learning channel, storage wars/pawn stars etc do not belong on the history channel.) But let's step back and remember that consumption drives creation when you're a business. Why did we stop showing the formation of the universe, or explaining the processes of childbirth with 3D MRIs of fetal development stages to show Honey Boo Boo, or Entourage, or The Wire or Breaking Bad. Because that's what people want to watch, the companies would go out of business if they didn't provide it.

 

Third, personal responsibility is basically what makes us humans. I agree that in the time we're alive (and, historically pretty much forever as far as I know.) Human beings are pretty terrible to each other. Things like rape, murder, assaults, fraud, theft - pretty much all of those are directly beneficial to one person and detrimental to others. The simple fact is that we're not in the utopia of humanity that Gene Roddenberry envisioned for the Star Trek universe. You can't pretend that asking companies to go out of business by providing edutainment when that's not what the populace is asking for right now, isn't a little short sighted.

 

Finally, let's be completely totally honest, and use what you hate - personal experience. I've played violent video games basically my entire life, I love violent movies (especially war epics, and post-apocalypse survival tales) they're so different from reality that they're an interesting experience for me. I'm not a violent person, I've only ever hurt another person (or animal, or anything) in self defense, and if you think you can tell me my personal experience of having to take someone else's life in defense of my own is irrelevant to the topic, you're too angry or delusional to reach logically. In fact, I tend to go out of my way to protect other people (even complete strangers.) It also so happens that some of my best and closest friends happen to be your typical 'hero' archtypes (firefighters, emergency medical workers, all sorts of first responders actually including law enforcement, my family has a military history, and I know my fair share of doctors, scientists, et cetera - as well as what most people would consider skeezy - people who might sell weed, or maybe just are highschool drop outs covered in tattoos.) Guess what? Most of them are completely decent people, and every single one of them likes violent movies and video games, for the exact reason I stated - it's an interesting experience that we all know isn't real.

 

People have got to stop blaming companies, media, guns, celebrities, whatever - for the problems that our society is having. It doesn't matter where you are in the world, our society as a whole has systemic problems throughout it. Education and parental involvement in a childs development are absolutely required. My ancedotal evidence would be that myself, and all the people I know who are good people - we all were raised by very good parents, involved in our lfies, allowed us to learn and grow, et cetera - and most of us, myself included - didn't come from well off families. I went to public school, both my parents worked, but they raised me to be responsible for my own actions, and shaped my moral system. Stop blaming everyone else, the problem starts and stops with the child and his or her own parents (or guardians), if you want to make a difference, you don't need to try to change the media. That's a top down approach (that if you haven't noticed, has been proven to be pretty ineffective at changing anything at all.) If you want to help, go find a kid who needs a mentor, and help them become a better person. If other people follow suit (even if it's just that kid, when he grows up, helping other kids, who will help other kids when they grow up) you will eventually cause the slow, gradual bottom-up change that's necessary for a permanent paradigm shift. You're trying to fix the effect, you need to fix the cause. If you're not mentoring or helping a child who doesn't have a good role model, and you're posting arguments like this online, you're part of the problem - not the solution.

 

This is absolutely all I have to say on the subject, and I will not respond to this thread again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

proanim, don’t get drawn into his circular logic. As with religion, he has already made up his mind and you will never get your point across.
He is the type of person who believes the Bible is true because the Bible itself says it is true.

You can point out 10 obvious flaws in his logic and you will only get met with 10 ridiculous excuses. Excuses tailored towards letting him believe the last 10 years of his life (the approximate amount of time it takes for one to begin an idea and then solidly believe in it) were not the waste that they were.

I am only going to point out the most obvious among them: How his point-of-view defeats itself.

Hi, I am L. Spiro, and I played violent video games as a child. I grew up with Mortal Kombat and I put more of my life into Killer Instinct than I will openly admit.
I have only met my father a few times and I never really saw my mother much as I grew up. I was raised by video games. Violent video games.

And here I am today, traveling the world making video games. In fact I have just gone through my worst days in recent times, as the person I intended to marry for the last 2 years just got married. And not to me.
I am going through the normal grieving process through which everyone else goes. I have been consumed by tears for the last few days.

But did I do a 12-hit combo on that person? Did I take up guns and start shooting people?
In fact I didn’t even post about it on Facebook, and if you have seen my GameDev.net posts during the last 3 days you would not have a clue that this kind of drama was happening in the background.


It has nothing to do with how I was raised. Nothing to do with the games I played.
Nothing to do with my parents.
The only factor at play is my frontal lobe. If life deals you a good one you can grow up to be a great person no matter what hardships you face as a child.
If life deals you a bad one you really don’t have much of a chance. Whether it be games or something else, you only gain satisfaction from the bad experiences.
That is how his point-of-view defeats itself. Your frontal lobe can get just as much good out of games—and everything else—as it can bad. Games are an easy target so these kinds of people target them, unable to muster anything more. But ultimately:
#1: Once games are eliminated and you see the same rate of crime, what will your next target be?
#2: Why acknowledge only the bad that people gain from games? Why never acknowledge the good?  Someone seems biased!

 

 

Instead of telling developers what to do why don’t you tell kids to get better frontal lobes?  Frontal lobes will chew on any experience and magnify either the good or the bad.

Bad people will be bad without video games.

Good people will be good even with bad video games.

 

Deal with this reality check instead dragging your drama into our forums.

 

 

L. Spiro

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I have noticed about the recent mass shootings is that the people responsible, regardless of age, had mental issues that were either known and ignored or not known at the time. Most of the children who have committed these acts were tormented by other children in school. The fact that most played violent video games or watched violent movies is irrelevant. They had issues that were not being addressed and snapped.

 

I am ever amazed at how we are so willing to point fingers at something else when the actual issue is too difficult to address. "Violent media is the issue! NO, guns are the issue! No, guns and violent media are both equally the issue. Ad nauseam."

 

The actual issue is that parents are no longer closely monitoring the well being of their children. Children are allowed to live their lives in secret. Parents often know little about the personal lives of their children. Bullying is practically ignored and responding to a bully will typically get the child that is bullied in more trouble than the bully. The end result is a situation where a bullied child has no choice but to repress the hurt and anger. This is terribly unhealthy. When mental issues get involved, all the worse. Mental health is of virtually no importance in today's society. People are walking the streets criminally insane because no one is willing to do anything about it. We don't want to force them to take medications. We don't want to institutionalize until they commit a crime. We let them slip through the cracks.

 

The people that commit these acts are going to commit these acts regardless if we stop violent media and destroy all guns.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0