Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
PhillipHamlyn

Triangle "Budget" for Terrain

This topic is 2072 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Does anyone have a general rule for the number of triangles they'd budget on for a terrain, after frustum culling has taken place ? I've got a tiled LOD system, and before I start optimising I'd like a steer on what people tend to aim at. My optimisation steps will be based on measurement-change-remeasure, but I dont want to strive for a high level of geometry if most people aim for (for instance) 50k triangles, and dont see a need to optimise beyond that to achieve a higher triangle count.

 

Thanks

 

Phillip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Effective texture resolution is often just as important as geometry detail (especially when using normal mapping). I generally try to aim for ~2 texels per pixel (or more, if multisampling is enabled).

 

As for geometry, the primary goal is to provide smooth silhouettes (since normal mapping doesn't help there). Ideally, you want ~1 vertex per pixel near silhouette edges, and can get away with drastically less everywhere else.

 

If you are using tessellation + displacement mapping this can be very simple/fast - you keep a fairly low-resolution control grid around, and use that to dynamically increase tessellation for just the silhouette.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Effective texture resolution is often just as important as geometry detail (especially when using normal mapping). I generally try to aim for ~2 texels per pixel (or more, if multisampling is enabled).

 

As for geometry, the primary goal is to provide smooth silhouettes (since normal mapping doesn't help there). Ideally, you want ~1 vertex per pixel near silhouette edges, and can get away with drastically less everywhere else.

 

If you are using tessellation + displacement mapping this can be very simple/fast - you keep a fairly low-resolution control grid around, and use that to dynamically increase tessellation for just the silhouette.

Thanks swiftcoder. I'll try increasing my texture realism and already use bump mapping so I might get  a suprisingly good result from the approach you advise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!