• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
PhillipHamlyn

Optimal Mult-Sampling in Pixel Shader ?

3 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I have a pixel shader for a terrain tile which samples a texture atlas for various ground cover.

 

I have around 8 different ground cover types which I pass to the PS via a Texture Blend Map using Texture2D NormalizedByte4 with one channel per texture weight.

 

Most pixels will blend perhaps 3 of the 8 possible textures, exceptionally 4.

 

What is the optimal way to sample the textures ?

 

I  followed the standard "linear" "add them all up" approach, shown below;

textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,0))) * textureWeights1.a;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,0))) * textureWeights1.r ;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,1))) * textureWeights1.g ;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,1))) * textureWeights1.b ;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,0))) * textureWeights2.a;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,0))) * textureWeights2.r;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,1))) * textureWeights2.g;
textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,1))) * textureWeights2.b;

However I could have bypassed the many lookups by checking the texture weight prior to sampling. Like this

if(textureWeights1.r > 0) textureColor += tex2D(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,0))) * textureWeights1.r ;

 

Which is the recommended approach for performance in a pixel shader ? I understand that the PS can bypass texture lookups sometimes, but I dont know whether doing this manually by checking the texture weight myself is a better solution, especially because I expect only 50% maximum of the texture lookups to actually achieve anything.

 

Phillip




			
		
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's the way you'd do it. Use the [branch] attribute in front of your if statements to indicate you want dynamic branching.

 

Unfortunately, in order to successfully bypass the texture lookups, you'll need to use tex2Dlod, as gradient-based instructions don't work inside a dynamic branch (so you'll never see any benefit from your if statements if you keep using tex2D). This means you'll need to calculate the mipmap level manually outside the branch (assuming you're using mipmaps).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks phil_t.

 

Unfortunately I'm using SM2 so cannot use tex2DLod. Fortunately it seems I can use text2DGrad to get the same outcome, in combination with ddx() and ddy() helpfully discussed here http://www.gamedev.net/topic/470659-anyone-tell-me-the-difference-of-tex2dgrad--and-tex2d/

 

Even more unfortunately although text2DGrad is supported in SM2 (and therefore Reach Profile) ddx() and ddy() are not supported until SM2.1.

 

It seems I need to abandon Reach profile in order to get optimal performance in branched texture lookups. Ah well, its only a hobby game, so moving to HiDef wont be an issue.

 

Phillip

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm,

I followed my nose and have the following now; which works nicely enough.

if(textureWeights1.a > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,0)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights1.a;
if(textureWeights1.r > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,0)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights1.r;
if(textureWeights1.g > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,1)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights1.g;
if(textureWeights1.b > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas1,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,1)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights1.b;

if(textureWeights2.a > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,0)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights2.a;
if(textureWeights2.r > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,0)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights2.r;
if(textureWeights2.g > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(0,1)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights2.g;
if(textureWeights2.b > 0) textureColor += tex2Dgrad(TextureSamplerAtlas2,getAtlasTextureCoords(textureCoords, float2(1,1)), texDdx, texDdy) * textureWeights2.b;

 

Phillip

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0