• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Quat

Organizing Planar Reflective Materials

5 posts in this topic

Right now my renderer is kind of hardcoded with a special path to handle planar reflective materials (those that I generate a reflection map for by rendering the scene from a mirrored camera).  Right now this is only used for water surfaces. 

 

I want to generalize my renderer so it doesn't have this special path: it just inputs a list of render items (basically, mesh + material).  My question is where should the reflective texture go?  Should it be part of the material: like PondWaterMaterial owns the reflection map?  Then I can't share the same material among different water surfaces unless they are on the same plane (which might not be a big deal).  Should the reflection map somehow be coupled with the water mesh surface? 

 

Also, if I do have a generic rendering system that just inputs a list of "render items", do I just perform a simple query to find out which render items require a reflection map to be generated by the engine?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Should the reflection map somehow be coupled with the water mesh surface?

 

I think so... but you are being terribly unspecific about 'reflection map.' So you're rendering from a mirrored camera? Well then yeah, if you have this 'coupling' configured to support any sort of reflection mapping technique, then I guess that would be quite good. It's very standard and sensible to have your reflection map seperate from the material. Reflection maps are applied/shared by meshs in the context of the environment (though sometimes blurred etc) and a material is merely... a material. smile.png

 

do I just perform a simple query to find out which render items require a reflection map to be generated by the engine?

 

You seem to be fishing pretty far out. I think you'll know what to do when you get to it. Otherwise, this is kind of a vague question.

Edited by Reflexus
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A 'material' isn't the only thing that needs to send data to a draw-call -- e.g. your camera is sending a view-projection matrix and your object instance is sending a world matrix. In a general renderer, both of these "data sources" could be the same level as a 'material'. I don't even really have a material class in my engine, instead I might have a variable named "material", but it's just a source of data/states that happens to contains material-type information (like a shader, some texture/cbuffer bindings, etc).

 

You could have a separate "planar reflection" object, which as a list of renderables which use it. It can check if any of these objects are visible to the current camera, and if so, it needs to generate it's texture. When those renderables are rendered, they can source the appropriate state (i.e. texture binding) from this object.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would treat a static planar reflection as a regular environment map. An environment map is linked to a mesh or a face by the artist and might be set up as planar, cubic, paraboloid or spherical.

 

As such I wouldn't include a special "reflection map" at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so... but you are being terribly unspecific about 'reflection
map.' So you're rendering from a mirrored camera? Well then yeah, if you
have this 'coupling' configured to support any sort of reflection
mapping technique, then I guess that would be quite good. It's very
standard and sensible to have your reflection map seperate from the
material. Reflection maps are applied/shared by meshs in the context of
the environment (though sometimes blurred etc) and a material is
merely... a material

 

What I mean by reflection map is a dynamic texture the engine generates at runtime that stores the reflection about some plane (usually a water plane).  The reason it is related to the "material" is because my material needs to know what resources to bind to the shader stages.  And for a water material, the reflection map will need to be specified. 

 

You could have a separate "planar reflection" object, which as a list of
renderables which use it. It can check if any of these objects are
visible to the current camera, and if so, it needs to generate it's
texture. When those renderables are rendered, they can source the
appropriate state (i.e. texture binding) from this object.

 

Something like this would work.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I mean by reflection map is a dynamic texture the engine generates
at runtime that stores the reflection about some plane (usually a water
plane).  The reason it is related to the "material" is because my
material needs to know what resources to bind to the shader stages.  And
for a water material, the reflection map will need to be specified.


Yeah that is what I assumed. I just wanted you to be more specific so I could be sure about what you really meant, because my answer about your organization would have depended on this most. Thanks for clarifying.

 

I would treat a static planar reflection as a regular environment
map. An environment map is linked to a mesh or a face by the artist and
might be set up as planar, cubic, paraboloid or spherical.


As such I wouldn't include a special "reflection map" at all.

 

But his is not static... otherwise I agree.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0