• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
deltaKshatriya

A Person as a Nation....

7 posts in this topic

The idea that a person is looked at as a nation, or country, etc. was given to me by a friend. At first I dismissed it, but then started to think about the parallels between the two ideas. I saw a way that could work as a really abstract metaphor, but was more curious about what others think about it. What do you guys make of it? 

 

(Yes, this is me just pondering about an abstract concept for lack of a better thing to do)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few movies that use people as basis for political and social allegory:

 

War Of The Roses (book)

Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf? (play)

Lord Of The Flies (book)

The Paul Street Boys (book)

The Day The Earth Stood Still (original screenplay; more of a stretch seeing as the story is based on the life of Christ, but you're free to draw your parallels from there)

 

The idea isn't always obvious and in many cases provides a number of ways to be interpreted, but then again that's the whole point of allegory.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it is possible, but groups of like-minded individuals are more effective, more industrious, safer, and specialized than their singular counterparts. They are also somewhat stupider.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

describing a person the way a nation is described

There's lots of ways that nations are described - many of which are just derogatory stereotypes of the people that make them up... biggrin.png

 

I'm guessing you mean more along the lines of sovereignty?

In our lives, besides gods and ideals, a nation is the highest authority that we can submit to. From birth, we implicitly submit to the will of the nation, and never have a say about it. The nation has the monopoly on force, it alone as the right to wield violent power. The nation is a system through which the forces of coercion can flow. Inside the nation, every single law that we follow is always backed by the coercive force of the threat of violence.

Externally, between nations, there are treaties and laws, but there is no monopoly on violence. If one nation defies the rules (which as always, are backed by violence), then they have their own violent forces to resist the punishment. There is no greater power that the nation must submit to. They are free to express their own will.

 

Every man is sovereign. He has the power to enforce his will upon his own body, and he also has the power to defy the will of others. However, the nation exists to mediate our individual wills, wielding greater force than any individual in order to do so. The fact that we are coerced into following the will of the nation does not change the fact that every man is sovereign - we play a game where we give up our sovereignty to a nation, but it's just a shared hallucination. At the end of the day, the only rule that actually exists is that we follow our will (or God's will, if you like).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking specifically of the idea of describing a person the way a nation is described. Any other thoughts?

Given that many descriptions of nations at some point include "A group of people", then you can set yourself up for some slightly awkward jokes.

Just how many personalities must one have before they can call themselves a nation? Should they all agree, or does having at least a few directly oppose the opinions of the others add additional flavour and character to this nation?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

describing a person the way a nation is described

There's lots of ways that nations are described - many of which are just derogatory stereotypes of the people that make them up... biggrin.png

 

I'm guessing you mean more along the lines of sovereignty?

In our lives, besides gods and ideals, a nation is the highest authority that we can submit to. From birth, we implicitly submit to the will of the nation, and never have a say about it. The nation has the monopoly on force, it alone as the right to wield violent power. The nation is a system through which the forces of coercion can flow. Inside the nation, every single law that we follow is always backed by the coercive force of the threat of violence.

Externally, between nations, there are treaties and laws, but there is no monopoly on violence. If one nation defies the rules (which as always, are backed by violence), then they have their own violent forces to resist the punishment. There is no greater power that the nation must submit to. They are free to express their own will.

 

Every man is sovereign. He has the power to enforce his will upon his own body, and he also has the power to defy the will of others. However, the nation exists to mediate our individual wills, wielding greater force than any individual in order to do so. The fact that we are coerced into following the will of the nation does not change the fact that every man is sovereign - we play a game where we give up our sovereignty to a nation, but it's just a shared hallucination. At the end of the day, the only rule that actually exists is that we follow our will (or God's will, if you like).

Actually, that's exactly what I was thinking of, like a man as a sovereign. If we really went very far, stereotypes could be applied, output could be measured, etc. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems pretty straightforward, although kind of backwards in my mind. I think it's pretty obvious that an organization will reflect the traits of its components, and  therefore vice versa.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0