• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Alpha_ProgDes

Can we change the way points work?

7 posts in this topic

Recently two posters who had around 100 points rated up one of my posts (thank you by the way). And I got +3 for each vote up. Which I thought was weird. On the old site, a +3 vote up was because the poster had significantly more points than you. Not because you had a significant number of points.

 

Any chance, we can change back to the old way?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did your actual total rating actually go up by +3, or does it only say +3 on your history?

 

A user's impact on your rating is effected by their existing rating, as far as I know. However, when they rate you, it always shows up as +3 on your rating history (due to a bug) and as +3 on the green pop-ups.

 

If I rate you up, you get +4, but it'll show as only +3. (+4 is the highest, as far as I can tell). I mentioned in another thread that when a user with zero rating rates me up, I get +0. Although, oddly, in that case, it actually shows up as +0 instead of +3. huh.png

 

Watch:

 

I chose a random user who I know makes friendly and helpful posts:

alpha1a.png

 

I uprated that random user with +4 points:

 

alpha2.png

 

But it shows up as +3 in his rating history:

alpha3.png

 

(pardon the blatant and uncalled for flattery, I'm just trying to be humorous smile.png)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I got a +5 once but I'm not too sure. We should ask Hodgman to experiment once he hits 10k points. Which should be any second now o.O'

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't find the post in this forum where it was explained how much a single vote may vary. Anyway, I kinda like the fact that an upvote is worth more than one point. Why? Because you get +1 just for logging into this site during the day. I personally think an upvote should be worth more than that, which consequently means it should be worth more than just one point.

Sure, logging in falls under "participation" and an upvote falls under "scholar," but I think we should emphasize the importance of "scholar" and not over inflate "participation." Making upvotes worth more than logging in helps with that, in my opinion.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the observation, Servant of the Lord...I kept thinking "wait...didn't I get more than +3 reputation for that?" and it made me wonder if I was starting to become obsessed with getting more reputation, causing reputation hallucinations ohmy.png

 

logging in falls under "participation"

 

How does simply logging in fall under participation?  All you're really doing is just viewing stuff unless you upvote/post something, right?  "Lurking" isn't participating in any discussions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

logging in falls under "participation"

 
How does simply logging in fall under participation?  All you're really doing is just viewing stuff unless you upvote/post something, right?  "Lurking" isn't participating in any discussions.

I dunno, that's just the way points are broken down. I think the goal is that it (hopefully) encourages people to come to the forums more regularly (but yeah, you don't really have "participate" as you say).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I got a +5 once but I'm not too sure. We should ask Hodgman to experiment once he hits 10k points. Which should be any second now o.O'

Just ticked over to 10001 cool.png damage is still +4 (and reported as +3)

GaRcyFS.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0