Sign in to follow this  
floatingwoods

OpenGL Trouble with very slow rendering with nvidia under Linux

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have a cross-platform openGl application that works fine with most graphic cards. However, there are rare cases when rendering is very slow under following conditions:

- Linux (Ubuntu)

- Nvidia card (e.g. Nvidia NVS 5200 M)

 

The application runs a single thread (the main thread), and turns vsync off at the beginning (following is the Linux code to turn Vsync off):

 

typedef int (APIENTRY * AAAAGLSWAPINTERVALEXTPROC)(int);
AAAAGLSWAPINTERVALEXTPROC wglSwapIntervalEXT=(AAAAGLSWAPINTERVALEXTPROC)glXGetProcAddress((const GLubyte*)"glXSwapIntervalSGI");
if (wglSwapIntervalEXT)
{
    wglSwapIntervalEXT(0);
}

 

Rendering gets very slow because following functions seems to be blocking for several ms even with an almost empty scene content:

 

 

openglWidget->swapBuffers(); // Qt command

or/and

openglWidget->doneCurrent(); // Qt command

 

It seems that VSync could not be turned off! More strange is that following command:

 

 

export __GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=1

 

improves the rendering speed (but still takes around 40-50 ms for each frame).

 

what is going on here? Other platforms or other graphic cards do not have any problem at all. It is critical to be able to render as quickly as possible (disable vsync) for various reasons (e.g. rendering for generation of movie files).

 

Thanks for any insight!!

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a linux expert, but under windows you often have the option to set the driver settings to overwrite application settings, including the vsync. Therefor check if your driver settings first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a known bug in nVidia's binary blob drivers.

nVidia has been working with Valve to fix a number of performance issues. A newer (experimental) version 310 of the driver is available in the Ubuntu archives for testing with: it may solve this particular problem. On quantal this is the nvidia-experimental-310 package and on raring it's just nvidia-310. Try that and see if it solves your problem: you can always return to the default nvidia-current package if there are other problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Driver 313.09 is out already.

I strongly do not recommend installing nVidia drivers directly from nVidia into Ubuntu.

(1) The nVidia drivers directly from Ubuntu are not packaged correctly: they follow the methodology of stomping all over your system without respect to the Ubuntu packaging, and it's difficult or impossible to back them out without reinstalling your system.

(2) Ubuntu tests the drivers before packaging them, and does not distribute drivers with known breakage (instead, they work with nVidia to remedy the situation in another driver release -- Canonical actually has full-time people working with nVidia to help with this).

Of course, it's your system. If you break it, you get to keep both halves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, it's your system. If you break it, you get to keep both halves.

That's why I have /home on a separate partition :D

 

I did broke the graphical desktop environment a few times on Debian, just delete the nVidia script that blacklists nouveau and it works again. It wasn't because the drivers though, I had driver packages from Debian that conflicted with the ones I downloaded from nVidia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did broke the graphical desktop environment a few times on Debian, just delete the nVidia script that blacklists nouveau and it works again. It wasn't because the drivers though, I had driver packages from Debian that conflicted with the ones I downloaded from nVidia.

The "package conflict" is because Debian installs various libraries using DEB packaging and the dpkg-alternatives system, symlinking driver-specific OpenGL shared objects so they get picked up at run time. The nVidia installer does not use packaging and simply clobbers the links with real libraries. You can tweak in the kernel modules all you want, you're effectively blixened once the packaging has been clobbered unless you carefully manually remove and re-symlink all the libraries as well. Don't miss one. Also, don't forget to remove the several-versions-out-of-date xorg.conf that nVidia installs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "package conflict" is because Debian installs various libraries using DEB packaging and the dpkg-alternatives system, symlinking driver-specific OpenGL shared objects so they get picked up at run time. The nVidia installer does not use packaging and simply clobbers the links with real libraries

Yep, I know. Had to delete a few soft links here and there (pretty much the standard approach to installing newer GCC versions too) Re installing the Debian packages should remake all the links if you want to go back. Dunno why is a big issue.

 

Anyway, whatever suits your boat. Its fun to me to install new drivers and see what's new. Somebody may want to wait until everything just works, its fine by me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "package conflict" is because Debian installs various libraries using DEB packaging and the dpkg-alternatives system, symlinking driver-specific OpenGL shared objects so they get picked up at run time. The nVidia installer does not use packaging and simply clobbers the links with real libraries

Yep, I know. Had to delete a few soft links here and there (pretty much the standard approach to installing newer GCC versions too) Re installing the Debian packages should remake all the links if you want to go back. Dunno why is a big issue.
 
Anyway, whatever suits your boat. Its fun to me to install new drivers and see what's new. Somebody may want to wait until everything just works, its fine by me.

Installing the Debian package will not restore the symlinks. That was my point. It will simply fail.

 

I don't have a problem if you like to install third-party software and tweak your system, or if you like to customize the kernel and build your own gcc -- I do it all the time.  Where the problem happens is when I have to spend time addressing complaints from someone because "someone on a forum somewhere on the web told me to do it this way and it broke my system, and now it's broken, it's your fault and Ubuntu sucks, tell me how to fix it right now."

 

So, anyone can go ahead and munge their system.  I still strongly recommend against doing so unless you already know how to recover, in which case you probably wouldn't be asking here for advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628370
    • Total Posts
      2982300
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now