INSANE quadtree bugs/artefacts

Started by
1 comment, last by Lil_Lloyd 11 years, 2 months ago

Hi people

I've been working on a quad tree demo for some time and used this gentleman's code as a study to learn:

">

However my results for the island scene look like this:

">

I started following the base code loosely, but to try and get the rendering of the quadtree correct I adhered quite closely to the terrain files as I was being driven slowly crazy. Even now when I see very little difference between the sets of code there must be some faults.

The important code is as follows:


int halfWidth  = m_width/2;
	int halfHeight = m_height/2;

	//init verts
	vec3* vertData = new vec3[m_numVertices];

	for(int z = 0; z < m_height; z++){
		for(int x = 0; x < m_width; x++){

			int index = z * m_width + x;

			int imgIndexZ = z;
			int imgIndexX = x;
			if(z == imgHeight){
				imgIndexZ--;
			}
			if(x == imgWidth){
				imgIndexX--;
			}

			int imgIndex = imgIndexZ * m_width + imgIndexX;


			vertData[index].x = (x - halfWidth) * LANDSCAPE_SCALE;
			vertData[index].y = (float)data[imgIndex] * HEIGHT_SCALE;
			vertData[index].z = (z - halfHeight) * LANDSCAPE_SCALE;
		}
	}

The above is how I init my vertices values, with data being an image file holding the height values. The land mass itself renders fine if I render it as a whole block without a quadtree using an indexed VAO and GL_TRIANGLES.

The indices generating function of the terrain chunks if I go the alternative route, however, is as follows:


int heightmapDataPosX = posX;
int heightmapDataPosY = posY;
unsigned int offset = (unsigned int)pow(2.0f, (float)(lod));
unsigned int div = (unsigned int)pow(2.0f, (float)(depth+lod));
	
int heightmapDataSizeX = HMsizeX/(div) + 1;
int heightmapDataSizeY = HMsizeY/(div) + 1;

int nHMWidth   = heightmapDataSizeX;
int nHMHeight  = heightmapDataSizeY;
int nHMOffsetX = heightmapDataPosX;
int nHMOffsetY = heightmapDataPosY;

GLuint nHMTotalWidth = HMsizeX;
GLuint nHMTotalHeight = HMsizeY;

m_indOffsetW[lod] = nHMWidth*2;
m_indOffsetH[lod] = nHMHeight-1;
GLuint numIndices = (nHMWidth-3)*(nHMHeight-4)*2;
m_indices[lod] = new GLuint[numIndices]; 
m_numIndices[lod] = numIndices;

int index = 0;

for(GLuint y=1; y< nHMHeight-3; y++)
{
  for(GLuint x=1; x< nHMWidth-2; x++)
  {
    GLuint id0 = COORD(x*(offset) + nHMOffsetX, y*(offset) + nHMOffsetY);
    GLuint id1 = COORD(x*(offset) + nHMOffsetX, y*(offset) + nHMOffsetY+(offset));
    m_indices[lod][index++] = id0;
    m_indices[lod][index++] = id1;
  }
}

I have to alter the termination conditions for y and x and the numIndices because for some reason I get a memory access error, even though the numberOfVertices should be ok...

I know its masochistic but if anyone can help me I'd be so grateful! I've been going crazy for days... My github repo is here: https://github.com/LloydGhettoWolf/TitanicTerrain/tree/workingversion

Advertisement

Your lack of replies is likely because it is hard to tell which bugs are related to your quadtree (which should be an octree, yes?) and which are related to something else.

For example you have missing triangles. That would not be related to quadtrees unless you have done something horribly wrong and are in need of a major rewrite.

Besides, you already have memory-access errors.

Fix everything else so we can see problems that are only related to the quadtree.

L. Spiro

I restore Nintendo 64 video-game OST’s into HD! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCtX_wedtZ5BoyQBXEhnVZw/playlists?view=1&sort=lad&flow=grid

I fixed the big issues using a different approach found on the rastertek site, but thankyou for replying. However, now I have bizarre frustum culling issues where nearby quads are being culled. I'll post a separate thread for that.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement