• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Thomas Wiborg

Microsoft confirms XNA is over

28 posts in this topic

There really needs to be some functionality that shows when similar topics already exist.

like...and stay with me on this one...a search function?!

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well,i never used xna,mostly because it was in c#.But I'm sure they'll make a replacement for it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well,i never used xna,mostly because it was in c#.But I'm sure they'll make a replacement for it

It's called "OpenGL". wink.png

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So C++ with the new math libs is the only future proof option?

..

Define "future proof"?

 

If you want to make games for XBLIG, then XNA is still the only option, even though there's not going to be any updates to it from now on...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So C++ with the new math libs is the only future proof option?

Which part of the C++11 math library are you talking about? They didn't add standardized matrices or similar without informing me, did they?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So C++ with the new math libs is the only future proof option?

Which part of the C++11 math library are you talking about? They didn't add standardized matrices or similar without informing me, did they?

 

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chuckw/archive/2012/03/27/introducing-directxmath.aspx

 

Or if you rather: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shawnhar/archive/2013/01/08/simplemath-a-simplified-wrapper-for-directxmath.aspx

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's really bad news ...

I was a bit surprised that Microsoft even bothered with updating XNA in the first place, i've always seen it as the indie xbox360 API (and the xbox360 doesn't change much).

 

The big question i would like to see answered really is: Does Microsoft intend to completely ignore indie developers for their next console or will there be a lower level wrapper instead for that one ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a bit surprised that Microsoft even bothered with updating XNA in the first place, i've always seen it as the indie xbox360 API (and the xbox360 doesn't change much).

That's really bad news ...

 

The big question i would like to see answered really is: Does Microsoft intend to completely ignore indie developers for their next console or will there be a lower level wrapper instead for that one ?

 

I don't see why a hypothetical "DirectX 12" can't fulfil both roles.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a bit surprised that Microsoft even bothered with updating XNA in the first place, i've always seen it as the indie xbox360 API (and the xbox360 doesn't change much).

That's really bad news ...

 

The big question i would like to see answered really is: Does Microsoft intend to completely ignore indie developers for their next console or will there be a lower level wrapper instead for that one ?

 

I don't see why a hypothetical "DirectX 12" can't fulfil both roles.

I read a post about what MS sent to the DX and XNA MVPs(http://ventspace.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/directxxna-phase-out-continues/) the other day and that really seemed to indicate they where stopping every thing DX related, and sticking the parts that where used in the platform SDK. This means we are only going to see a potential "D3D 12" when windows 9 rolls around, seeing win 8 shipped with 11.1 which is rumored to be the API the next Xbox will use as well.

 

It seems MS is making people use C++ again as this is their major language for win 8 development on all win 8 varieties.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems MS is making people use C++ again as this is their major language for win 8 development on all win 8 varieties.

They aren't "making" you do anything; C# (well, anything .Net really) remains a core language for Windows development, be it RT/Metro/Phone or desktop. What has happened is that C++ has got back on an equal footing inside the ecosystem so it can be used and interop with those other languages in a much nicer way (the C++/CX extensions are pretty swish; allowing interop while also allowing normal C++ code).

The way they are handling WP8 and Metro/Store development MIGHT be a hint as to how they'll allow development for the next console; the kernel is likely to be the same after all so you have the same sandboxing models in place as you have in Store/Phone apps. I wouldn't expect it on release, but 6 months to a year down the line, once everything is stable? Maybe.

Of course, much like Window's Store apps I wouldn't be surprised if you needed to be running Windows 8 to develop for it...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah they've stopped support on it but it is still a perfectly good framework to use.

Edited by Six222
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and sticking the parts that where used in the platform SDK

This has already happened. The "DirectX SDK" stopped existing long ago.

>It seems MS is making people use C++ again as this is their major language for win 8 development on all win 8 varieties.

Why so? You can't use plain old C++ at all with WinRT/Metro/Windows-Store -- you can use C++/CX or C# though, which appear to be on equal footing.
You can also use D3D via C# -- XNA was never a "C# version of D3D", it's a comprehensive game framework/engine.

So C++ with DirectXMath is the only future proof option?

You're comparing XNA, which is a complete game framework programmable via C#, with C++ and DirectXMath, which is a language and a math library? I don't understand the comparison...

As you are most likely aware, XNA is a .Net wrapper around the C++ based directX bindings. .. so my thinking is that if XNA is not updated when they remove the old math library (and MSFT just said they would not), that effectively kills it, or worse, math just got a lot harder to figure out for game development for the noobs.   Am I communicating clearly?  If not, I apologize.. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are most likely aware, XNA is a .Net wrapper around the C++ based directX bindings. .. so my thinking is that if XNA is not updated when they remove the old math library (and MSFT just said they would not), that effectively kills it, or worse, math just got a lot harder to figure out for game development for the noobs.   Am I communicating clearly?  If not, I apologize.

 

You're missing a point on the previous page - XNA has not just suddenly ceased to exist.  You can still use it.  It's still a supported platform.  It just won't be updated in future, but that's no reason to suddenly declare it off-limits for anything.  It's still there, it still works, you can still use it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are most likely aware, XNA is a .Net wrapper around the C++ based directX bindings

Ah ok. Well, it's actually a lot more than that.
SlimDX or SharpDX are .Net wrappers around DX.
XNA is more like a .Net game engine (a game-oriented runtime framework and a tool-chain) that happens to use DX. It provides systems other than just wrappers, and it provides different abstractions than DX, which makes it something more than just a wrapper.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are most likely aware, XNA is a .Net wrapper around the C++ based directX bindings. .. so my thinking is that if XNA is not updated when they remove the old math library (and MSFT just said they would not), that effectively kills it, or worse, math just got a lot harder to figure out for game development for the noobs.   Am I communicating clearly?  If not, I apologize.

 

You're missing a point on the previous page - XNA has not just suddenly ceased to exist.  You can still use it.  It's still a supported platform.  It just won't be updated in future, but that's no reason to suddenly declare it off-limits for anything.  It's still there, it still works, you can still use it

 

This is correct. The only thing that is not certain is for how long the XBL Indie Games service will continue to be supported. Currently, XNA is the only way possible to get indie games distributed on Xbox, and there's no word yet if a similar service is coming to the console's successor.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is correct. The only thing that is not certain is for how long the XBL Indie Games service will continue to be supported. Currently, XNA is the only way possible to get indie games distributed on Xbox, and there's no word yet if a similar service is coming to the console's successor.

Given how they are treating Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 with regards to getting indie developers on the platform to produce apps I wouldn't be surprised if the next Xbox has something in much the same going forwards - however given, last I checked, the next Xbox hasn't been officially announced yet the lack of word with regards to any supported APIs and functionality is hardly surprising.

MS aren't known for giving details pre-official announcements to the point where they will go silent on issues they plan to address in up coming conferences (see: various Win8 related things from last year).

As I said on the other page; the kernel is likely to be the same as WP8/Win8 so the ability to sandbox will be the same, however I suspect for the indie crowd you might end up with a requirement to go to VS2012 (certainly for VS in fact) and Win8 to do anything with it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0